{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "method": "versioned-tpi-analysis",
  "records": [
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 8",
      "priority": "border",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00008F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "172aab0db1faf342194d07a821be55c64710ee1984cd1f954ae1516529b1255e",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "172aab0db1faf342194d07a821be55c64710ee1984cd1f954ae1516529b1255e",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To secure the Texas border, strengthen immigration enforcement, deter illegal immigration, and protect Texas taxpayers and sovereignty, we propose these core reforms: Local Cooperation with Federal Enforcement: Require all local jurisdictions to fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including maximum participation in the 287(g) Program (Immigration and Nationality Act) for removals. ∙ Penalties for Sanctuary Policies: Empower the Texas Attorney General to prosecute local government officials who interfere with or obstruct immigration enforcement. ∙ Strengthen Border Operations: Overhaul the Texas border mission by establishing a dedicated Border Protection Unit focused on preventing illegal entry, combating human trafficking and cartel activity, and facilitating the removal of individuals unlawfully present in the United States. ∙ E-Verify and Employment Controls: Mandate E-Verify for all Texas employers with significant penalties for noncompliance; prohibit state agencies and local governments from employing foreign visa workers or contracting with companies that use them directly or indirectly. ∙ End Benefits and Incentives for Illegal Presence: Terminate all non-emergency public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including in-state college tuition and enrollment in public schools (while preserving emergency medical care); deny all taxpayer-funded grants, incentives, and subsidies (including Texas Enterprise Fund grants and tax abatements) to companies that employ foreign visa workers. ∙ Remittance Tax for Enforcement: Impose a tax on cash and app-based remittances to foreign nations to help fund Texas immigration enforcement efforts.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Jail-sheriff immigration agreements and civil enforcement",
      "scope_explanation": "All four sections reviewed. Two equally weighted TPI directional criteria are satisfied: (1 + 1) / 2 × 100 = 100. Coverage is limited to the sheriffs specified by the bill. Civil equitable enforcement is treated as aligned with the direction of the prosecution demand; this is an explicit TPI interpretation, not a claim that the bill creates criminal prosecution or covers every local official.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "border-cooperation",
          "requirement": "Require covered jail sheriffs to pursue and implement federal immigration-enforcement agreements.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, Government Code 753.051–753.053",
          "excerpt": "The sheriff of each county that operates a jail or contracts with a private vendor to operate a jail shall request and enter into an immigration law enforcement agreement",
          "reason": "Sections 753.051–.053 require covered jail sheriffs to request and enter agreements, repeat unsuccessful requests annually, and allocate resources. The grant, reporting and implementation provisions support that obligation. Federal agreement acceptance is not guaranteed. The limited sheriff scope is disclosed without a breadth-only deduction.",
          "official_requirement": "Require all local jurisdictions to fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including maximum participation in the 287(g) Program (Immigration and Nationality Act) for removals."
        },
        {
          "id": "border-sanctuary",
          "requirement": "Provide attorney-general enforcement of covered sheriffs’ immigration-agreement obligations.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, Government Code 753.154",
          "excerpt": "The attorney general may bring an action against a sheriff who fails to comply with this chapter in a district court for appropriate equitable relief.",
          "reason": "Section 753.154 authorizes civil equitable relief and recovery of reasonable enforcement expenses in the sheriff’s county. TPI treats this enforceable civil mechanism as directionally aligned within the bill’s scope. It is not criminal prosecution, does not establish criminal penalties, and does not cover all obstructing local officials.",
          "official_requirement": "Empower the Texas Attorney General to prosecute local government officials who interfere with or obstruct immigration enforcement."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Border Protection Unit; E-Verify and employment controls; public benefits, visa-worker subsidies and remittance tax",
          "reason": "Sections 1–4 concern sheriff agreements, grants, reporting, enforcement and implementation dates. They do not change these separate programs."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope half-credit assessment; replaced under the approved TPI scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI analytical anchors assess the specified bill version under custom scoped criteria, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved or an official RPT grade.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 753.001–.002 and .051–.053",
            "assessment": "Defines agreements, permits disclosed donations, requires covered sheriffs to pursue agreements and allocate resources.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "border-cooperation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 753.101–.105",
            "assessment": "Funds participation costs subject to appropriated or available money, population tiers, eligible uses, monitoring, return of unused funds, and protection against offsetting county cuts.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "border-cooperation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 753.151–.154",
            "assessment": "Requires reports and proof of attempts; authorizes civil equitable enforcement and expense recovery.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "border-sanctuary"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "December 1, 2026 compliance deadline implements the agreement obligation.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-cooperation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Permits grants to cover specified September 30, 2025–January 1, 2026 participation costs.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-cooperation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 effective date except as otherwise provided; passage status remains separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-cooperation"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Require covered jail sheriffs to pursue and implement federal immigration-enforcement agreements. Provide attorney-general enforcement of covered sheriffs’ immigration-agreement obligations."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1498",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01498F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "6e596036235c3785ac78284e02823da1227e5539534ca9280e1d7560de826c0c",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "6e596036235c3785ac78284e02823da1227e5539534ca9280e1d7560de826c0c",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed analysis; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Civil asset forfeiture",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version was examined. Criteria include every current-priority requirement changed or directly implicated by its operative provisions, including adverse provisions. Other requirements listed below are outside this bill’s operative scope; they are excluded, not treated as satisfied. A narrow scope can score 100 without fulfilling the whole priority.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-abolish-forfeiture",
          "requirement": "Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely",
          "outcome": "conflict",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1 (definitions), Sections 2 and 4 (venue), Sections 3 and 5 (seizure/custody); Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 59",
          "excerpt": "including a digital currency, non-fungible token, or stablecoin",
          "reason": "Makes digital-asset civil forfeiture explicit and adds procedures. The prior contraband definition already included intangible property; this is not a claim that digital assets were previously exempt. Section 1 specifies digital assets, proceeds and wallets; Sections 2 and 4 address venue; Sections 3 and 5 address seizure and secure custody. Maintaining and operationalizing civil forfeiture opposes the explicit abolition requirement: minus one point. Secure custody after seizure is not final forfeiture."
        },
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-conviction",
          "requirement": "ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal.",
          "outcome": "conflict",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Sections 2 and 4, Articles 59.023(a) and 59.04(b); current Chapter 59 context: Article 59.05(b), (d)",
          "excerpt": "states probable cause that the proceeds are contraband subject to forfeiture",
          "reason": "The probable-cause affidavit supports initiation of proceedings, not the final forfeiture standard. SB 1498 adds digital-asset procedures within the existing civil process without introducing an affirmed-conviction prerequisite. Current Article 59.05(b) places the final-trial burden on the state under a preponderance standard; subsection (d) does not require a final criminal conviction. That continuing civil route conflicts with the priority prerequisite: minus one point. Article 59.05 is contextual law, not a new provision enacted by SB 1498."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Electric grid; water; foreign ownership and disclosure; eminent domain; agriculture and biosecurity",
          "reason": "Sections 1–7 amend digital-asset forfeiture and its effective date. They do not regulate these separate areas. No credit is awarded for them."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CR/htm/CR.59.htm",
          "sha256": "4659c7b61c19c5c172790bdcab3e81918ed98ff3170bc1786a7d7e0e3fc29d44",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-01T23:41:51.983Z",
          "locator": "Article 59.05(b), (d)",
          "role": "Current official statutory context, distinct from the enrolled bill snapshot; not attributed as newly enacted by SB 1498"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 835",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00835F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "14e482801330aa00ff74a7800b376c00a51b4e3de0e812627c7cf02f24f32a7e",
      "decision_source_sha256": "6a140b3b694fc8ca9c2ec2c9a5142464527642b50127392ad586e0c011e6d2e4",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Agreements concealing educator sexual abuse",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-concealment",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Prohibit concealment of educator sexual abuse through the agreements regulated by this bill.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, Civil Practice and Remedies Code 129C.001–129C.002; Section 3",
          "excerpt": "to the extent the provision prohibits a person, including a party, from disclosing an act of sexual abuse or facts related to an act of sexual abuse to any other person.",
          "reason": "Makes nondisclosure or confidentiality terms concerning defined sexual abuse void and unenforceable. The limitation to sexual abuse is disclosed; it is not a deduction under TPI’s scoped-provision method. For older agreements, the person seeking enforcement must obtain the specified declaratory judgment; disclosure itself does not require a prior judgment.",
          "official_requirement": "prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employment screening, Independent Inspector General, retroactive Do Not Hire enforcement, tiered penalties, and whistleblower protections against retaliation",
          "reason": "Sections 1–4 identify the act, define and void specified agreement clauses, apply the change to older agreements, and set an effective date. They do not change hiring screens, investigatory offices, registry sanctions, penalty tiers, employment retaliation remedies or protected reporting channels. Permission to disclose under a contract is not credited as a general whistleblower protection."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Marriage, family unity and parental rights; adoption, divorce and parenting presumptions; school programs, materials and data practices; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The text regulates confidentiality agreements about defined sexual abuse. It does not alter these separate family, school-program or retail requirements."
        }
      ],
      "companion_note": "SB 835 enrolled and HB 748 engrossed contain the same operative anti-concealment policy. They remain separate bills and versions; HB 748 is not treated as enacted because its companion became law.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Prohibit concealment of educator sexual abuse through the agreements regulated by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Sexual-abuse definition and unenforceability of concealment terms; unrelated settlement amounts/payment terms may remain confidential",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Older-agreement declaratory-judgment procedure applies to enforcement, not permission to disclose",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 1 and 4",
            "assessment": "Short title and effective date do not broaden the substantive protection",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 748",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00748E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "30639cc7f2b84d10344beb991358191c9e480c527bdf3ef66ebfda986d529e33",
      "decision_source_sha256": "42fa1e46fe376284bce35b2d1a5276320e4d4e5dc313e2ca5cbd90386cd4e0b5",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Agreements concealing educator sexual abuse",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-concealment",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Prohibit concealment of educator sexual abuse through the agreements regulated by this bill.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, Civil Practice and Remedies Code 129C.001–129C.002; Section 3",
          "excerpt": "to the extent the provision prohibits a person, including a party, from disclosing an act of sexual abuse or facts related to an act of sexual abuse to any other person.",
          "reason": "The engrossed proposal makes nondisclosure or confidentiality terms concerning defined sexual abuse void and unenforceable. Its operative policy aligns within that stated scope. The person seeking to enforce an older agreement must obtain the specified declaratory judgment; that is not a prerequisite for disclosure. This companion proposal is not treated as enacted.",
          "official_requirement": "prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employment screening, Independent Inspector General, retroactive Do Not Hire enforcement, tiered penalties, and whistleblower protections against retaliation",
          "reason": "Sections 1–4 identify the act, define and void specified agreement clauses, apply the change to older agreements, and set an effective date. They do not change hiring screens, investigatory offices, registry sanctions, penalty tiers, employment retaliation remedies or protected reporting channels. Permission to disclose under a contract is not credited as a general whistleblower protection."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Marriage, family unity and parental rights; adoption, divorce and parenting presumptions; school programs, materials and data practices; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The text regulates confidentiality agreements about defined sexual abuse. It does not alter these separate family, school-program or retail requirements."
        }
      ],
      "companion_note": "SB 835 enrolled and HB 748 engrossed contain the same operative anti-concealment policy. They remain separate bills and versions; HB 748 is not treated as enacted because its companion became law.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Prohibit concealment of educator sexual abuse through the agreements regulated by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Sexual-abuse definition and unenforceability of concealment terms; unrelated settlement amounts/payment terms may remain confidential",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Older-agreement enforcement procedure, not a disclosure prerequisite",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 1 and 4",
            "assessment": "Short title and effective date; proposal status remains separate",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-concealment"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1151",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01151F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "48050eebf128ee5b816ea0abff59ce8af51d5c79b616f4b2dd36965b386166e0",
      "decision_source_sha256": "a5acc41b827e44dc648ebe1e47f3d28cdad689b5b210393b20878cdc2a73147e",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parental medical decisions in DFPS child-protection suits",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Protect parental decisions about psychiatric and alternative treatment within the child-protection proceedings addressed by this bill.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–3, Family Code 161.001(c), 261.001(4), 262.116(a)",
          "excerpt": "the parent refused to administer or consent to the administration of a psychotropic medication to the child",
          "reason": "Adds protection against the specified adverse child-protection treatment based on a parent’s refusal of psychiatric treatment or selection of alternative treatment, unless the refusal or treatment presents substantial risk of death, disfigurement or bodily injury, or causes observable material impairment of the child’s growth, development or functioning. Retained homeschooling and immunization provisions are context, not new achievements. The narrower child-protection setting does not reduce credit under TPI’s scoped-provision rule.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, inspector general, retroactive Do Not Hire enforcement, tiered penalties, anti-concealment agreements and whistleblower protections; same-sex adoption, no-fault divorce, 50/50 parenting presumptions; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The new provisions regulate specified medical-choice protections in DFPS termination, neglect and possession proceedings. They do not change employee screening/discipline, agreements, whistleblower remedies, adoption, divorce, parenting presumptions or retail sales."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy",
          "reason": "Protecting a parent from specified child-protection consequences does not regulate funding or implementation of school programs or materials. The bill does not order or fund those programs."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Protect parental decisions about psychiatric and alternative treatment within the child-protection proceedings addressed by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Family Code 161.001(c)",
            "assessment": "Termination-of-parental-rights evidence protection with specified harm exceptions; retained protections not newly credited",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2, Family Code 261.001(4)",
            "assessment": "Neglect-definition protection with the same specified harm exceptions",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3, Family Code 262.116(a)",
            "assessment": "DFPS possession restriction with the same specified harm exceptions",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 4–5",
            "assessment": "Applies to department suits filed on/after the effective date, preserving prior law for earlier suits",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1534",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01534E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "01c10cb4d7cd247094e64a9b851ea8db202a83618b665806d0d1745da214e26d",
      "decision_source_sha256": "01c10cb4d7cd247094e64a9b851ea8db202a83618b665806d0d1745da214e26d",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Confirmation of parental notices in DFPS adversary hearings",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require judicial confirmation that parents received the existing notices of rights in the DFPS proceeding addressed by this bill.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–3; Family Code262.2011",
          "excerpt": "Before commencement of the full adversary hearing, the court shall, in writing and in open court, confirm that:",
          "reason": "Adds a judicial check that required notices of existing rights were given. It does not create the underlying rights or an evidence-suppression remedy. The new confirmation requirement supports parental rights within this proceeding; missing broader cross-agency reforms are not a deduction under TPI’s scoped-provision method.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, inspector general and Do Not Hire enforcement; penalty tiers, concealment agreements and whistleblower protections; adoption, divorce and equal-parenting presumptions; elimination of covered harmful programs/materials; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The complete specified version regulates the stated parent-access/consent/education/notice scope. It does not implement those independent policy demands. No harmful-program applicability is presumed from the mere existence of school instruction or technology."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require judicial confirmation that parents received the existing notices of rights in the DFPS proceeding addressed by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Judicial confirmation of existing DFPS rights notices, rather than creation of underlying rights",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 2–3",
            "assessment": "Applies prospectively to suits filed on/after the effective date, preserving prior law for earlier suits",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SJR 12",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SJ00012E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "7d08759e97c62a1f91da498eeb395b2fecc5c5f5a836c96067d36f7ad7d54d0d",
      "decision_source_sha256": "7d08759e97c62a1f91da498eeb395b2fecc5c5f5a836c96067d36f7ad7d54d0d",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Proposed constitutional amendment on parental education rights",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Protect parents’ direction of education and access to educational information within the constitutional proposal’s scope.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–2; proposed ArticleI37(b)–(d)",
          "excerpt": "A parent has the right to direct the education of the parent's child",
          "reason": "Proposes constitutional education-choice, materials-access, meeting-access and student-record rights, with disability nondiscrimination. Those substantive provisions support parental rights within education. Other agency contexts are outside this proposal, not a breadth deduction. The prescribed election does not establish voter adoption.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, inspector general and Do Not Hire enforcement; penalty tiers, concealment agreements and whistleblower protections; adoption, divorce and equal-parenting presumptions; elimination of covered harmful programs/materials; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The complete specified version regulates the stated parent-access/consent/education/notice scope. It does not implement those independent policy demands. No harmful-program applicability is presumed from the mere existence of school instruction or technology."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Protect parents’ direction of education and access to educational information within the constitutional proposal’s scope.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, proposed Article I Section 37",
            "assessment": "Education choice, records/materials/meeting access and disability nondiscrimination",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Submission to voters; election scheduling is not evidence of adoption",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 5263",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB05263E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "2e3e5af30bc30e2624a11ababb5cbda340d0458b015e78dc2ada834da73a6048",
      "decision_source_sha256": "2e3e5af30bc30e2624a11ababb5cbda340d0458b015e78dc2ada834da73a6048",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent-controlled access to state assessment results",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Give parents direct, parent-controlled access to their child’s state assessment results.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–2; Education Code26.005",
          "excerpt": "be in control of a parent or guardian without the need to secure additional information from any third party.",
          "reason": "Adds one-click access to results and parent-controlled student-specific credentials with security protocols. The retained statutory access exception is not a new adverse amendment. No new harmful data-collection practice is inferred from the existence of a portal, and no achieved cybersecurity outcome is claimed.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, inspector general and Do Not Hire enforcement; penalty tiers, concealment agreements and whistleblower protections; adoption, divorce and equal-parenting presumptions; elimination of covered harmful programs/materials; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The complete specified version regulates the stated parent-access/consent/education/notice scope. It does not implement those independent policy demands. No harmful-program applicability is presumed from the mere existence of school instruction or technology."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Give parents direct, parent-controlled access to their child’s state assessment results.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Education Code 26.005",
            "assessment": "One-click assessment-results access, parent-controlled credentials and security protocols; retained exception distinguished",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Effective-date provision",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 371",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00371E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "60758dc278730b8f07b4b4f218c2a26b521f35b75cc495c4887b74c2af55c3dc",
      "decision_source_sha256": "60758dc278730b8f07b4b4f218c2a26b521f35b75cc495c4887b74c2af55c3dc",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parental consent for school human-sexuality instruction",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require informed written parental consent for the school human-sexuality instruction regulated by this bill.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–3; Education Code28.004(i-2)",
          "excerpt": "a school district must obtain the written consent of the student's parent.",
          "reason": "Requires written parental consent and advance provision of the request. The request may accompany the existing subsection (i) notice but cannot be bundled with other notices or consent requests. The fourteen-day procedure implements consent and is not a deduction. The bill does not prescribe substantive curriculum content; no separate harmful-program finding is presumed.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, inspector general and Do Not Hire enforcement; penalty tiers, concealment agreements and whistleblower protections; adoption, divorce and equal-parenting presumptions; elimination of covered harmful programs/materials; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The complete specified version regulates the stated parent-access/consent/education/notice scope. It does not implement those independent policy demands. No harmful-program applicability is presumed from the mere existence of school instruction or technology."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require informed written parental consent for the school human-sexuality instruction regulated by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Education Code 28.004(i-2)",
            "assessment": "Written parental consent, separate presentation with the express existing-notice exception, and fourteen-day advance request",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 2–3",
            "assessment": "Application and effective date do not alter the consent alignment or prove passage",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": 50,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior broad-scope method deducted for requirements outside this bill. Revised TPI method evaluates alignment within the bill’s substantive scope.",
          "archive_url": "https://www.texansforpublicintegrity.com/data/rpt/bill-alignment-history-20261102-v1.json"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 16",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Senate engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00016E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "2461609c7413704236196abfdf5f30e71e69ffe7575f44bf9006b7dcee3ebd5b",
      "decision_source_sha256": "6e5318c95c0ceb510019b801e52cdcd38b671e1547d02fb4c1b8c9088e8aad19",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Citizenship registration, procedural penalties, limited-federal voting and counting",
      "scope_explanation": "All 15 sections reviewed. Four equally weighted criteria: citizenship +0.5; procedural enforcement +1; single-day voting −1; immediate precinct counting −1. Sum −0.5 / 4 × 100 = −12.5, clamped to 0. This conflict anchor preserves the positive provisions; it does not mean every provision conflicts. Implementation provisions receive no extra weight.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-citizenship",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require verified citizenship for registration, including the limited-federal pathway.",
          "outcome": "partial",
          "locator": "Sections 1–4 and 12; Election Code 13.0721(c)–(e),13.0722,115.001–115.005",
          "excerpt": "approve the application only for voting a limited federal ballot under Chapter 115",
          "reason": "Documentary proof and database verification strengthen eligibility checks, but unresolved citizenship permits limited-federal registration. That express exception supports half credit. Database verification is not itself a flaw. Known noncitizens are rejected; unresolved status is not proof of noncitizenship.",
          "official_requirement": "Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote"
        },
        {
          "id": "elections-procedure-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Penalize specified knowing violations of mandatory registration procedures.",
          "official_requirement": "enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 3–4, 13.072(f)–(g) and 13.0721(g)–(h)",
          "excerpt": "knowingly fails to reject an application as required under Subsection (c)",
          "reason": "13.072 requires knowing failure to reject when subsection (c) requires rejection, including its exceptions. 13.0721 requires knowing or intentional registration without required verification AND actual registration of a noncitizen. These offenses are grouped once; neither criminalizes every unresolved application."
        },
        {
          "id": "elections-single-day",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Confine the newly authorized limited-federal voting pathway to election day.",
          "official_requirement": "limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations",
          "outcome": "conflict",
          "locator": "Section 12, 115.001",
          "excerpt": "during the early voting period or on election day",
          "reason": "The new pathway expressly authorizes early voting, directly opposing the single-day requirement. This is a new operative authorization, not a deduction for merely retaining unrelated existing law."
        },
        {
          "id": "elections-immediate-counting",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Count the affected ballots at precinct polling locations immediately upon the close of polls.",
          "official_requirement": "conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls",
          "outcome": "conflict",
          "locator": "Section 12, 115.002–115.004",
          "excerpt": "The registrar shall deliver the container containing the limited federal ballots to the presiding judge of the early voting ballot board on a rolling basis.",
          "reason": "Registrar review, post-election citizenship proof and ballot-board counting conflict with immediate precinct counting. Deliveries roll: first no later than election day, last by the applicable 87.125 board deadline; not all ballots are held until that last day. Manual or automatic tabulation is allowed; automatic equipment is not evidence of internet connectivity."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "English-only ballots; quarterly rolls/address checks; photo ID and mail eligibility; party affiliation; elected Secretary of State; donation limits; election-date and bond rules",
          "reason": "These separate demands are not changed by the specified 15-section version. General implementing rules receive no independent credit. Counting technology is not inferred to be internet-connected."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-01",
          "reason": "Prior unscored hold: citizenship-only denominator omitted early voting and counting provisions."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI analytical anchors assess the specified bill version under custom scoped criteria, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved or an official RPT grade.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Documentary proof and DPS submission route.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Volunteer-deputy notice, documentation restriction and training implement citizenship verification and limited-ballot notice.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Verification prerequisite and knowing rejection offense, subject to statutory exceptions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Verification, rejection of matched noncitizens, unresolved limited-federal pathway, existing-registrant review and conjunctive knowing/intentional offense.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Changes registration mail form from postcard to business reply mail; administrative format, not a new voting method.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Form instructions and citizenship identifier fields implement verification.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7",
            "assessment": "Attorney-general verification/reporting, knowing or intentional noncitizen registration offense and prosecution after specified local inaction.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 8",
            "assessment": "Avoids repeat proof for verified voters; references 13.0721(b), which concerns database contracting, not the verification determination. Drafting cross-reference is disclosed, not repaired.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 9",
            "assessment": "F notation and removal upon proof/verification implement limited-federal registration.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 10",
            "assessment": "F-marked voters accepted only for limited-federal ballots.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 11",
            "assessment": "Adds Chapter 115 to restricted-ballot definition.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 12, 115.001",
            "assessment": "New limited-federal early voting authorization.",
            "outcome": "conflict",
            "criterion_id": "elections-single-day"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 12, 115.002–.004",
            "assessment": "Sealed custody, registrar review, rolling delivery, post-election proof and ballot-board counting instead of immediate precinct count. Notice says proof by sixth day; review says before sixth day. Preserve this discrepancy.",
            "outcome": "conflict",
            "criterion_id": "elections-immediate-counting"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 12, 115.005",
            "assessment": "Outcome notice, proof instructions and cancellation notice for admitted noncitizens; no assumption that unresolved voters are noncitizens.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 13",
            "assessment": "Implementing rules receive no separate scoring weight.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 14",
            "assessment": "Requests federal form change and judicial enforcement after 180 days; no assumption of federal approval.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 15",
            "assessment": "Effective-date provision; assessed Senate engrossment is not treated as enacted.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-citizenship"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/SB01703F.htm",
          "locator": "Section 7, 87.125",
          "role": "Historical ballot-board deadline"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/85R/billtext/html/HB01151F.htm",
          "locator": "Section 2, 87.125",
          "role": "Historical ballot-board deadline amendment"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/872/billtext/html/SB00001F.htm",
          "locator": "Sections 5.16–5.17, 87.062 and 87.103",
          "role": "Historical manual and central counting provisions; later 89R SB 2753 is excluded"
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require verified citizenship for registration, including the limited-federal pathway. Penalize specified knowing violations of mandatory registration procedures. Confine the newly authorized limited-federal voting pathway to election day. Count the affected ballots at precinct polling locations immediately upon the close of polls."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3592",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "House engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03592E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "e1d4cbcf1b8977bc8e48af5d77fbe7dc003e1d0052865472fa60c265fb760a19",
      "source_file": "research/scoring-sources/89R-HB03592E.htm",
      "decision_source_sha256": "446f4593530587a167f6d3123fbbe173f95accafed6a6a93cb95d1bcbe07adfe",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed automated analysis with independent automated interpretive review; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Out-of-state contribution limits for specified recipient elections",
      "scope_explanation": "All three sections reviewed. One applicable requirement, weight 1: limit out-of-state donations. One satisfied contribution gives 1/1 × 100 = 100. Scope limitations remain part of this assessment; 100 does not mean comprehensive campaign-finance reform or fulfillment of the whole elections priority. Knowing acceptance, principal address, specified recipient elections, prospective aggregation and implementing rules are disclosed, not silently treated as universal coverage.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-out-of-state",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "limit out-of-state donations",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Election Code 253.044(a)–(c)",
          "excerpt": "A candidate or an officeholder may not knowingly accept",
          "reason": "Adds aggregate per-election caps of $5,000 for statewide office, $2,500 for district office and $1,000 for county office. The rule concerns knowing acceptance of political contributions from a person whose principal address is outside Texas, for an election in which the candidate’s or officeholder’s name appears on the ballot. Contributions accepted in violation must be returned; after a formal hearing the civil penalty may be up to three times the contributions accepted in violation, not expressly just the excess portion. The return deadline is the later of the reporting-period end or the fifth day after acceptance. Section 2 excludes pre-effective-date contributions from aggregation; subsection (d) requires implementing rules. These enforceable limits satisfy the stated demand within the specified recipient scope. The priority does not prescribe cap amounts or expressly require universal recipient coverage. Other offices/recipient types and foreign or terrorist-linked financing are not comprehensively regulated by this bill."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Foreign/terrorist-linked donations; voter eligibility, ballots, primaries, election dates, administration and oversight",
          "reason": "Sections 1–3 only establish out-of-state contribution limits and their prospective application/effective date. An out-of-state address is not treated as foreign or terrorist affiliation."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED_WITH_WORDING_CORRECTIONS",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "100 means this bill satisfies the assessed out-of-state contribution-limit requirement within the specified recipient scope. It is not a percentage of the bill, universal donation coverage, or complete elections-priority fulfillment.",
      "scored_requirement": "limit out-of-state donations"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 618",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Senate engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00618E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "03b43c5901433e9571f15e9eeb046ebda71561c4359c8632bb21bb67ea5d26d7",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "3e1f336aefd583c68fe7f6e9af61822f560b3443c64f6503eb72fa47ca44b02b",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed automated analysis with independent automated interpretive review; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Civil penalties for unlawful election-procedure changes",
      "scope_explanation": "Both sections and all amended subsections reviewed. One applicable requirement, weight 1: legislation penalizing unlawful election-procedure changes by public and election officials. The added civil enforcement mechanism satisfies that literal requirement: 1/1 × 100 = 100. The priority does not require immediate punishment, criminal sanctions, a minimum amount or prohibition of corrective opportunities. Notice and compliance conditions, the two distinct clocks, monthly reporting, investigation confidentiality and the self-directed SOS complaint route remain disclosed. Only an advisory that effects an unauthorized procedure change falls within the retained prohibition; not every advisory is punishable. The earlier 50 was withdrawn because its no-cure deduction was unsupported; this reassessment uses the audited literal-requirement rule.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-unlawful-altering-penalty",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Election Code 276.019(a)–(j-2), especially new (b)–(g)",
          "excerpt": "A public official or election official is liable to this state for a civil penalty",
          "reason": "Retains subsection (a)’s existing prohibition on unauthorized election-procedure changes and adds a penalty mechanism. After a formal complaint, the Secretary of State investigates and, on finding a violation, sends notice, a cease-implementation demand and compliance instructions. Subsection (c) requires referral after more than two business days of continued noncompliance. Subsection (d) describes daily liability for failure or refusal to take affirmative compliance action: up to $1,000 per day after the second day through the seventh day, and up to $5,000 per day after the seventh day. Those liability days are not described as business days. The Attorney General may seek recovery. This is not an automatic penalty for every initial violation. Removal under (g) applies to repeated violations by specified appointed local officials, not elected officials; that exception is not an express exemption from civil liability. Complaints about the Secretary of State or elections-division personnel are directed to the Secretary of State under (j)–(j-2), with reporting and response duties. Those provisions are read as supplementing, not expressly displacing, the general penalty provisions. This self-directed route does not establish independent investigation or guaranteed enforcement."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Remove existing waivers; make Secretary of State elected; uniform statewide administration",
          "reason": "The bill adds enforcement of an existing ban on unauthorized alterations. It does not repeal authorized waivers, change selection of the Secretary of State or replace the statewide election administration structure."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Registration/citizenship; photo ID; ballots and counting; primaries; donation limits; election dates and bond thresholds",
          "reason": "Neither operative section changes these independent requirements. Reporting and penalties are not treated as enactment of them."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED_WITH_WORDING_CORRECTIONS",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "100 means this bill satisfies the assessed requirement to establish penalties for unlawful election-procedure changes; notice and compliance conditions apply. It does not mean every initial violation receives a penalty, enforcement is independent or guaranteed, or the entire elections priority is fulfilled.",
      "scored_requirement": "enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1232",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01232E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "4aa1b5a55d923527c5abb9090985c0761974381d5a16eff2ce552822b5551d14",
      "decision_source_sha256": "8ffc00ae60746ce72f64475f46a1dfbe77ba3df7548966dba510fcc74e149e59",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation audit completed; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Whistleblower protection for reports about elected governmental officers",
      "scope_explanation": "The complete specified bill version and its substantive provisions were reviewed. TPI’s scoped-provision criterion below is distinct from the unchanged official RPT quotation. All reviewed substantive changes align within this bill’s stated scope, with no conflicting change identified. Broader priority demands outside this bill are not required for full scoped credit. One applicable TPI criterion, weight 1, contributes 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Mere subject-matter relevance would not earn this score.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-whistleblower",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Extend enforceable whistleblower protection to covered public employees reporting legal violations by elected officers of their employing governmental entity.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Government Code 554.002(a)",
          "excerpt": "or an elected officer of the employing governmental entity",
          "reason": "Adds elected officers of the employing governmental entity as subjects of protected reports. Incorporated Chapter 554 supplies the existing anti-retaliation protection, definitions, remedies, limits and reporting procedures. The extension supports protection within its stated scope; other reporters or nonlegal misconduct outside that scope are disclosed, not used as a breadth-only deduction. Good faith and appropriate-authority requirements remain. This does not claim newly enacted remedies or universal reporter coverage.",
          "official_requirement": "provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Screening, Independent Inspector General, retroactive Do Not Hire enforcement, tiered penalties and confidentiality agreements",
          "reason": "Neither section changes hiring, investigations, registry sanctions, penalty tiers or agreements. Reporting protection is assessed only under the separate whistleblower requirement."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Marriage, family unity and parental rights; adoption, divorce and parenting presumptions; school programs, materials and data practices; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "The two sections amend the persons whose violations may be reported under an employment-retaliation prohibition and its effective date; none regulates these separate requirements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "scored_requirement": "Extend enforceable whistleblower protection to covered public employees reporting legal violations by elected officers of their employing governmental entity.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Government Code 554.002(a)",
            "assessment": "Adds reports about elected officers; incorporated paid-employee, violation-of-law and appropriate-authority limitations remain",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-whistleblower"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Effective date implements the extension; passage status remains separate",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-whistleblower"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED_INTERPRETIVE_HOLD",
          "reason": "Previously unscored while the broad reporter/misconduct scope was unresolved. Source definitions and remedies had been checked. The new TPI scoped-provision method and independent review resolve that interpretive hold; no earlier numeric score was published."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/GV/htm/GV.554.htm",
          "sha256": "f1415c455dc112309cb63f73611f4321ede8996673f3f0daa3d488225837849c",
          "locator": "554.001–554.010",
          "role": "Existing definitions and remedies; not newly created by the bill"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1399",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01399F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "3202b185ec3fa8ddb8a87a7f4756f60ba7f224266d14777b8a4ec9b4b0e7ae16",
      "decision_source_sha256": "3202b185ec3fa8ddb8a87a7f4756f60ba7f224266d14777b8a4ec9b4b0e7ae16",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Exemption for qualifying retail animal-feed inventory",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Remove property taxation from qualifying animal-feed inventory held for retail sale.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.162",
          "excerpt": "is entitled to an exemption from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Creates an exemption for the appraised value of qualifying retail feed inventory. The incorporated 151.316(a)(3)–(4) categories cover feed for farm/ranch animals and animals held for sale in the regular course of business, not every pet-food product. Sections 2–3 limit application to future tax years and condition effectiveness on voter approval of the constitutional amendment. The score assesses the conditional legal text, not adoption or actual tax savings."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Adds the retail feed-inventory exemption with incorporated sales-tax eligibility categories.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies only to tax years beginning on or after the effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 effective date is conditional on constitutional voter approval; without approval the Act has no effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.151.htm",
          "sha256": "159638611a6bec9b2663656a2a5156acb91ed97b326a8c7de9afb5b0ffec8f66",
          "locator": "151.316(a)(3)–(4)",
          "role": "Incorporated eligibility context; current compilation is not used to infer enactment of the assessed bill."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2723",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02723F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "49a586f8174d06cb62564aec6a1367578dfc8d008935ed35cf016b1d15baf541",
      "decision_source_sha256": "49a586f8174d06cb62564aec6a1367578dfc8d008935ed35cf016b1d15baf541",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Automatic exemption for qualifying unidentified-owner burial property",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Remove application barriers that leave qualifying unidentified-owner burial property subject to property tax.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.43(t)–(u)",
          "excerpt": "shall grant the exemption authorized by that section",
          "reason": "Requires the chief appraiser to grant the existing 11.17 exemption without an application when the owner is unidentifiable and the appraiser knows or should know from reasonable inspection that the property qualifies. Optional governmental/nonprofit assistance supports identification. Existing exclusive-human-burial and not-for-profit conditions remain; the bill does not newly exempt all cemeteries. The mandatory grant changes tax exposure, not merely form design."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.43(t)",
            "assessment": "Mandatory exemption where no application, qualifying property is reasonably identifiable, and owner is unidentifiable; all conditions apply.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.43(u)",
            "assessment": "Permits assistance to determine qualification, without expanding 11.17 eligibility.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d9b8946c0b42eb5091a52e06d02ceb276a5c43bb57f1c314a546df9a99c1b6bc",
          "locator": "11.17",
          "role": "Incorporated eligibility context; current compilation is not used to infer enactment of the assessed bill."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4752",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04752E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "3ef39040a02b718a108f2ed7c12b0a6f7fb9e7fefa14fdefe2440be0eccdb59f",
      "decision_source_sha256": "3ef39040a02b718a108f2ed7c12b0a6f7fb9e7fefa14fdefe2440be0eccdb59f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Expanded charitable-fundraising organization exemption eligibility",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Expand access to existing property-tax exemptions for otherwise qualifying charitable fundraising organizations.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.18(g)–(g-1)",
          "excerpt": "is not ineligible for an exemption",
          "reason": "Deletes the state/national fundraising-affiliation condition and permits additional distributions to public higher-education institutions without disqualification. Federal charitable status, volunteer governance, distributions to at least five qualifying associations and other retained 11.18 requirements still apply. These are two substantive eligibility changes, not newly created universal charitable exemptions. The engrossed bill is not treated as enacted."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.18(g)",
            "assessment": "Removes fundraising-affiliation condition; preserves charitable status, volunteer board, five-recipient and recipient conditions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.18(g-1)",
            "assessment": "Allows additional public-higher-education distributions without losing exemption eligibility; does not replace five qualifying associations requirement.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Specified January 1, 2026 effective date does not establish enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d9b8946c0b42eb5091a52e06d02ceb276a5c43bb57f1c314a546df9a99c1b6bc",
          "locator": "11.18(a)–(g)",
          "role": "Incorporated eligibility context; current compilation is not used to infer enactment of the assessed bill."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3637",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03637E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "da000e9b7718f262bf6711a2191bc187c8d6ca5884ef83e97db1f19f848d4517",
      "decision_source_sha256": "da000e9b7718f262bf6711a2191bc187c8d6ca5884ef83e97db1f19f848d4517",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "County-option exemption for rainwater and graywater system value",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Enable removal of property taxation on value attributable to specified water-conservation installations.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.325",
          "excerpt": "may adopt an exemption from taxation",
          "reason": "Enables a county commissioners court to exempt the portion of value attributable to rainwater-harvesting or graywater installations across every taxing unit taxing that property. This is an exemption-enabling step, not an automatic statewide exemption: county adoption and constitutional voter approval are required. Graywater uses the incorporated 341.039 definition. No actual county adoption, exemption uptake, enactment or net tax reduction is inferred. The companion records remain separate."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.325(a)",
            "assessment": "Incorporates existing graywater definition; does not alter water-quality rules.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.325(b)",
            "assessment": "Authorizes county adoption of an exemption applying across taxing units, limited to installation-attributable value.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Conditional January 1, 2026 effectiveness only with constitutional voter approval; otherwise no effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.341.htm",
          "sha256": "31141db5ba2421378e7a363fbe634f7bab44f7224a3c16998f0b10abe4e48d56",
          "locator": "341.039(e)(2)",
          "role": "Incorporated eligibility context; current compilation is not used to infer enactment of the assessed bill."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1633",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01633E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ba6fb3730989521508d88782169b7813794b3b32856d4f73c1a3801d44c2f96a",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ba6fb3730989521508d88782169b7813794b3b32856d4f73c1a3801d44c2f96a",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "County-option exemption for rainwater and graywater system value",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Enable removal of property taxation on value attributable to specified water-conservation installations.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.325",
          "excerpt": "may adopt an exemption from taxation",
          "reason": "Enables a county commissioners court to exempt the portion of value attributable to rainwater-harvesting or graywater installations across every taxing unit taxing that property. This is an exemption-enabling step, not an automatic statewide exemption: county adoption and constitutional voter approval are required. Graywater uses the incorporated 341.039 definition. No actual county adoption, exemption uptake, enactment or net tax reduction is inferred. The companion records remain separate."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.325(a)",
            "assessment": "Incorporates existing graywater definition; does not alter water-quality rules.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.325(b)",
            "assessment": "Authorizes county adoption of an exemption applying across taxing units, limited to installation-attributable value.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Conditional January 1, 2026 effectiveness only with constitutional voter approval; otherwise no effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.341.htm",
          "sha256": "31141db5ba2421378e7a363fbe634f7bab44f7224a3c16998f0b10abe4e48d56",
          "locator": "341.039(e)(2)",
          "role": "Incorporated eligibility context; current compilation is not used to infer enactment of the assessed bill."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 1",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00001F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "008f62ec56180bfebfbcc46f440e7126fdd334b993e7df22af75dc2efa181773",
      "decision_source_sha256": "008f62ec56180bfebfbcc46f440e7126fdd334b993e7df22af75dc2efa181773",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "$125,000 business-personal-property exemption authority",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, 1(g)",
          "excerpt": "may exempt from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Replaces the administrative-cost-threshold limitation with authority for a $125,000 exemption of income-producing tangible personal property. It authorizes a general law; it does not itself grant that statutory exemption. Deleted language was checked in the original HTML. The amount is authority within this resolution, not a claim that all business property taxes disappear."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, 1(g)",
            "assessment": "Replaces the administrative-cost-threshold limitation with authority for a $125,000 exemption of income-producing tangible personal property. It authorizes a general law; it does not itself grant that statutory exemption. Deleted language was checked in the original HTML. The amount is authority within this resolution, not a claim that all business property taxes disappear.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SJR 81",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SJ00081E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "a229ab10fd199a8250f24fd071d8a327c69ca718844639486ab408dea8dbfdae",
      "decision_source_sha256": "a229ab10fd199a8250f24fd071d8a327c69ca718844639486ab408dea8dbfdae",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "$25,000 business-personal-property exemption authority",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, 1(g)",
          "excerpt": "may exempt from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Replaces the administrative-cost-threshold limitation with authority for a $25,000 exemption of income-producing tangible personal property. Deleted language was checked in original HTML. This Senate-engrossed alternative is separate from HJR 1 and does not acquire its $125,000 amount or passage status."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, 1(g)",
            "assessment": "Replaces the administrative-cost-threshold limitation with authority for a $25,000 exemption of income-producing tangible personal property. Deleted language was checked in original HTML. This Senate-engrossed alternative is separate from HJR 1 and does not acquire its $125,000 amount or passage status.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 34",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00034F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "2544ebfca6256edbfdc84a008f2d6dff49268ddb6199f97f92c507235e42799f",
      "decision_source_sha256": "2544ebfca6256edbfdc84a008f2d6dff49268ddb6199f97f92c507235e42799f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Border-security improvement exemption authority",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-y",
          "excerpt": "may exempt from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Authorizes a general-law exemption only for real-property market value arising from border-security infrastructure and related improvements in counties bordering Mexico. Allows statutory definition and additional eligibility requirements. This is tax-exemption authority, not an appropriation, infrastructure construction mandate or automatic exemption."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-y",
            "assessment": "Authorizes a general-law exemption only for real-property market value arising from border-security infrastructure and related improvements in counties bordering Mexico. Allows statutory definition and additional eligibility requirements. This is tax-exemption authority, not an appropriation, infrastructure construction mandate or automatic exemption.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 72",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00072E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "c53f821a716209031bdce0c31db0f0b93c1e75afd9ea01d01313082724385700",
      "decision_source_sha256": "c53f821a716209031bdce0c31db0f0b93c1e75afd9ea01d01313082724385700",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Primary-residence exemption authority for qualifying disabled adult relatives",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-b-1",
          "excerpt": "may exempt from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Authorizes an exemption for qualifying real property used as the primary residence of an adult with an intellectual or developmental disability related to the owner or trustee within the third degree by consanguinity. The exempt portion is tied to Article VIII 1-b(c), not a new fixed amount in this resolution. Legislative definitions remain authorized. No adoption or statutory implementation is inferred."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-b-1",
            "assessment": "Authorizes an exemption for qualifying real property used as the primary residence of an adult with an intellectual or developmental disability related to the owner or trustee within the third degree by consanguinity. The exempt portion is tied to Article VIII 1-b(c), not a new fixed amount in this resolution. Legislative definitions remain authorized. No adoption or statutory implementation is inferred.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CN/htm/CN.8.htm",
          "sha256": "97a72612a5f813691ddcb94af20e50da7770ab03f092838dfac5624f0581c3a5",
          "locator": "Article VIII, Section 1-b(c)",
          "role": "Constitutional cross-reference for the exempt portion. Current compilation includes later amendments; candidate intentionally gives no fixed dollar amount and does not backdate current amounts to the engrossed resolution."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 88",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00088E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "e6714a5f80efc2d5444067cb865d31181898cd9095573037d412e84f4d44e5a4",
      "decision_source_sha256": "e6714a5f80efc2d5444067cb865d31181898cd9095573037d412e84f4d44e5a4",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "County-option water-system exemption authority",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-u",
          "excerpt": "may authorize the commissioners court of a county",
          "reason": "Authorizes the legislature to permit a county exemption across taxing subdivisions for value attributable to rainwater-harvesting or graywater installations, with additional statutory eligibility conditions. This constitutional enabling layer does not itself enact a county exemption. Legislative implementation and local adoption remain separate."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-u",
            "assessment": "Authorizes the legislature to permit a county exemption across taxing subdivisions for value attributable to rainwater-harvesting or graywater installations, with additional statutory eligibility conditions. This constitutional enabling layer does not itself enact a county exemption. Legislative implementation and local adoption remain separate.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "fresh_source_verification": {
        "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00088E.htm",
        "status": 200,
        "sha256": "e6714a5f80efc2d5444067cb865d31181898cd9095573037d412e84f4d44e5a4",
        "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:05:34.007Z",
        "matches_local_bytes": true
      }
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 99",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00099F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "1027552b26ec0716294564188b7de5831cf6265451014573d5ee7f67e75c2526",
      "decision_source_sha256": "1027552b26ec0716294564188b7de5831cf6265451014573d5ee7f67e75c2526",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Retail animal-feed exemption authority",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-s",
          "excerpt": "may exempt from ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Authorizes a general-law exemption for animal feed held for retail sale and additional statutory eligibility requirements. This resolution supplies constitutional authority; HB 1399 supplies a separate conditional statutory exemption. Neither record borrows the other’s legislative status."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-s",
            "assessment": "Authorizes a general-law exemption for animal feed held for retail sale and additional statutory eligibility requirements. This resolution supplies constitutional authority; HB 1399 supplies a separate conditional statutory exemption. Neither record borrows the other’s legislative status.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SJR 84",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SJ00084F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "aa03bee4a3add97cf3cc61238156aa586cfa3dd0f3615bec653e6cc975461f86",
      "decision_source_sha256": "aa03bee4a3add97cf3cc61238156aa586cfa3dd0f3615bec653e6cc975461f86",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Temporary exemption authority for fire-destroyed homestead improvements",
      "scope_explanation": "Both operative sections reviewed. Under the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method, constitutional authority for a specified exemption is an aligned enabling step. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100. This measures the proposal’s direction within its scope, not statewide elimination, actual adoption, fiscal savings or completion of implementing legislation.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Authorize the specified property-tax exemption through a constitutional enabling amendment.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-b(z)",
          "excerpt": "may provide for a temporary exemption",
          "reason": "Authorizes a temporary exemption of appraised improvement value where a residence-homestead improvement is completely destroyed by fire. Legislature may set duration and additional eligibility conditions. It does not exempt all land, all fire damage or all homesteads, nor set an automatic permanent exemption."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII, proposed 1-b(z)",
            "assessment": "Authorizes a temporary exemption of appraised improvement value where a residence-homestead improvement is completely destroyed by fire. Legislature may set duration and additional eligibility conditions. It does not exempt all land, all fire damage or all homesteads, nor set an automatic permanent exemption.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Directs submission of the specified proposition at the November 4, 2025 election. The date and ballot language do not establish adoption; passage status is separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "892",
      "bill": "HB 23",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/892/billtext/html/HB00023F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "bf125e26c0f06f9fbc3498d5abe6d37f7367d296fe0d815ac5fd5c3e05e0c668",
      "decision_source_sha256": "bf125e26c0f06f9fbc3498d5abe6d37f7367d296fe0d815ac5fd5c3e05e0c668",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Exemption for qualifying charitable agriculture/youth/education property in populous counties",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Extend or preserve the specified property-tax exemption for qualifying property.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.23(n)",
          "excerpt": "is exempt from all ad valorem taxation",
          "reason": "Creates an all-ad-valorem exemption for real/personal property owned by a qualifying nonprofit corporation in a county of at least 3.3 million people, with the specified exclusive organizational purposes and property-use purposes. Expressly excludes every for-profit lessee interest, including leaseholds and other possessory interests. The corporate definition does not make every nonprofit property eligible; all textual conditions remain. No statewide net tax cut is claimed."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Creates the conditional nonprofit-property exemption and excludes for-profit lessee interests.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/BO/htm/BO.22.htm",
          "locator": "22.001(5)",
          "role": "Incorporated nonprofit-corporation definition, subject to 22.054 exception; does not replace the bill’s additional purpose/use conditions.",
          "sha256": "777cf9c461e8929978e1cc43d33ee09d51cfe30c1a9d1886340c14d169acc341",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:10:08.753Z"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1675",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01675E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ece5ccbb5cbaa22fa77cde4ed65924ed45d977eab4bdf0b9b7ca4b08b18fb0d6",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ece5ccbb5cbaa22fa77cde4ed65924ed45d977eab4bdf0b9b7ca4b08b18fb0d6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent implementation and substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Preserved cemetery exemption for specified human-and-pet interment",
      "scope_explanation": "TPI custom tax criterion assesses property-tax elimination within the substantive scope of this bill, including an exemption or an enabling step. All operative sections were reviewed. One satisfied criterion, weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. This is scoped directional alignment, not 100% statewide elimination. Actual adoption and fiscal outcomes remain separate.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Extend or preserve the specified property-tax exemption for qualifying property.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 3, Tax Code 11.17",
          "excerpt": "human and pet burial in accordance with Section 712.010",
          "reason": "Extends existing not-for-profit cemetery exemption eligibility to human-and-pet burial complying with new 712.010. Section 2 permits specified interment of a deceased person’s cremated pet remains in the casket or beside cremated human remains, with memorial information, excludes livestock, requires permitted incineration and forbids euthanasia for this purpose. It is not a general pet-cemetery exemption. These interment rules define the tax-eligible activity and create no opposing tax provision. Earlier H-version fiscal note lacks Section 3 and is not used to establish E-version tax effects."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Names the Act Mona’s Law; no scoring contribution.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2, 712.010(a)",
            "assessment": "Defines eligible companion pet, excludes livestock, and requires remains incinerated at a permitted facility; incorporates cemetery terms.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2, 712.010(b)-(c)",
            "assessment": "Permits only specified joint human/pet interment and memorial information; prohibits euthanasia for this purpose. Defines the activity receiving exemption protection rather than a separate tax achievement.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Adds qualifying human-and-pet burial to 11.17 while retaining the not-for-profit condition.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Requires Finance Commission implementing rules.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 proposed effective date; engrossment is not enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; earlier research requested fiscal and scope decisions now superseded by the approved TPI elimination-only scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.711.htm",
          "locator": "711.001",
          "role": "Existing cemetery/interment definitions; no new exemption attributed to these definitions.",
          "sha256": "403dfa8478de058342598484186ffc554fad3753c85282b64b738668ac282ed8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:10:09.609Z"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.42.htm",
          "locator": "42.09",
          "role": "Livestock definition incorporated only to exclude livestock from the bill’s pet definition.",
          "sha256": "afd55680b91b395520a43851baa1b877fdce5daa38bb27bf305906655b838c13",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:10:09.738Z"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1592",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01592E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ab1e3b027a49e9d4f20f24a37f1d7e8150aaa0aca71139aa5046df8b8e00f7a9",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ab1e3b027a49e9d4f20f24a37f1d7e8150aaa0aca71139aa5046df8b8e00f7a9",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Voluntary pest, disease and quarantine notifications",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-scoped",
          "requirement": "Provide timely biosecurity alerts without new compulsory enrollment or quarantine authority.",
          "official_requirement": "promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 88.823(a); Section 1, 88.823(b); Section 1, 88.823(c)",
          "excerpt": "shall develop and implement a statewide Internet-based alert system",
          "reason": "Requires alerts for confirmed dangerous plant or wildlife pests/diseases, quarantine changes and Agriculture Department compliance agreements; the bill reports agency actions rather than creating quarantine powers. Email notifications and enrollment provide an alert channel; no mandatory farmer enrollment or new reporting penalty is enacted. Agency memoranda must enable notifications within 72 hours of applicable agency action; this is an information deadline, not a guaranteed eradication outcome."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 88.823(a)",
            "assessment": "Requires alerts for confirmed dangerous plant or wildlife pests/diseases, quarantine changes and Agriculture Department compliance agreements; the bill reports agency actions rather than creating quarantine powers.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 88.823(b)",
            "assessment": "Email notifications and enrollment provide an alert channel; no mandatory farmer enrollment or new reporting penalty is enacted.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 88.823(c)",
            "assessment": "Agency memoranda must enable notifications within 72 hours of applicable agency action; this is an information deadline, not a guaranteed eradication outcome.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date; engrossed status is not enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Provide timely biosecurity alerts without new compulsory enrollment or quarantine authority.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1269",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01269E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "3b1006ecb40a842de534b951df486a1900dd78eb57c6540614fcd03a36316218",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "3b1006ecb40a842de534b951df486a1900dd78eb57c6540614fcd03a36316218",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Plant disease and pest prevention research grants",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-scoped",
          "requirement": "Support plant biosecurity research through limited grants rather than compulsory farm regulation.",
          "official_requirement": "promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 71.901(a)–(c); Section 1, 71.901(d)–(e); Section 1, 71.901(f)–(h)",
          "excerpt": "may be used only by the recipient for the study of plant disease and pest prevention",
          "reason": "Defines extension service; creates research-only grants, restricted to Texas higher-education affiliates with institution, community and elected-official support letters. Selection based on potential state benefit, maximum 20 grants yearly, regional diversity and September 1 distribution deadline; no limit on researchers per grant. These are grant conditions, not duties imposed on farms. Creates restricted research-grant account funded by donations, federal grants, investment income and appropriations; does not guarantee an appropriation or eradication."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 71.901(a)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Defines extension service; creates research-only grants, restricted to Texas higher-education affiliates with institution, community and elected-official support letters.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 71.901(d)–(e)",
            "assessment": "Selection based on potential state benefit, maximum 20 grants yearly, regional diversity and September 1 distribution deadline; no limit on researchers per grant. These are grant conditions, not duties imposed on farms.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 71.901(f)–(h)",
            "assessment": "Creates restricted research-grant account funded by donations, federal grants, investment income and appropriations; does not guarantee an appropriation or eradication.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1, 2025; engrossed proposal only.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Support plant biosecurity research through limited grants rather than compulsory farm regulation.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "892",
      "bill": "HCR 13",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/892/billtext/html/HC00013F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "556e4a11b88aaadd5134dfd5a1d4c83f0fbc5627cb91c2a291b7fd143e3dc5e6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "556e4a11b88aaadd5134dfd5a1d4c83f0fbc5627cb91c2a291b7fd143e3dc5e6",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Nonbinding New World Screwworm response requests",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-scoped",
          "requirement": "Promote a coordinated screwworm response through federal research, facility and treatment requests.",
          "official_requirement": "promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "First RESOLVED clause; Second and third RESOLVED clauses; Fourth and fifth RESOLVED clauses",
          "excerpt": "curb the spread of the New World screwworm",
          "reason": "Urges federal action and resources with Mexico to curb screwworm spread; requests action rather than exercising federal authority. Requests expedited Moore Air Force Base control facility and USDA partnership with Texas A&M AgriLife for research space. Urges FDA medication and EPA pesticide approval expedition; does not waive agency safety standards or compel farmer treatment."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Preamble",
            "assessment": "Background assertions motivate the resolution; historical distance, loss estimates and outbreak descriptions are not independently verified present-day facts or new legal commands.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "First RESOLVED clause",
            "assessment": "Urges federal action and resources with Mexico to curb screwworm spread; requests action rather than exercising federal authority.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Second and third RESOLVED clauses",
            "assessment": "Requests expedited Moore Air Force Base control facility and USDA partnership with Texas A&M AgriLife for research space.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Fourth and fifth RESOLVED clauses",
            "assessment": "Urges FDA medication and EPA pesticide approval expedition; does not waive agency safety standards or compel farmer treatment.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Final RESOLVED clause",
            "assessment": "Directs transmission and requests Congressional Record entry; no appropriation, compulsory land access or actual eradication result is established.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Promote a coordinated screwworm response through federal research, facility and treatment requests.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3333",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03333F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "cd4ae8667f4c4dc9634dc599f9ad32a76be436ffd9f6238f1873a690fd59a55d",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "cd4ae8667f4c4dc9634dc599f9ad32a76be436ffd9f6238f1873a690fd59a55d",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "New direct wastewater discharges into covered Devils River waters",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-scoped",
          "requirement": "Protect the specified river and contributing waters by restricting new direct wastewater-discharge permits.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 26.0275(b)",
          "excerpt": "the commission may not issue a new permit authorizing the direct discharge",
          "reason": "Prohibits new permits for direct domestic/industrial wastewater-facility waste, effluent or pollutant discharge to those waters."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.0275(a)",
            "assessment": "Classified segments are Devils River portions in Val Verde County identified by the frozen September 1, 2025 30 TAC307.10 appendices; other covered water bodies must be in that county and drain to a classified segment. No statewide river ban is claimed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.0275(b)",
            "assessment": "Prohibits new permits for direct domestic/industrial wastewater-facility waste, effluent or pollutant discharge to those waters.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.0275(c)",
            "assessment": "Expressly preserves individual/general municipal separate storm-sewer permits and general stormwater/associated non-stormwater permits. This is not a ban on every discharge or a repeal of existing permits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies only to applications submitted on/after effectiveness; prior applications retain prior law.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Protect the specified river and contributing waters by restricting new direct wastewater-discharge permits.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 5333",
      "priority": "border",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB05333E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "1ff7b5ccae09bfc686015979c9c7983f870fdf6f9f0bf49a47eb642aaea42804",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "1ff7b5ccae09bfc686015979c9c7983f870fdf6f9f0bf49a47eb642aaea42804",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To secure the Texas border, strengthen immigration enforcement, deter illegal immigration, and protect Texas taxpayers and sovereignty, we propose these core reforms: Local Cooperation with Federal Enforcement: Require all local jurisdictions to fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including maximum participation in the 287(g) Program (Immigration and Nationality Act) for removals. ∙ Penalties for Sanctuary Policies: Empower the Texas Attorney General to prosecute local government officials who interfere with or obstruct immigration enforcement. ∙ Strengthen Border Operations: Overhaul the Texas border mission by establishing a dedicated Border Protection Unit focused on preventing illegal entry, combating human trafficking and cartel activity, and facilitating the removal of individuals unlawfully present in the United States. ∙ E-Verify and Employment Controls: Mandate E-Verify for all Texas employers with significant penalties for noncompliance; prohibit state agencies and local governments from employing foreign visa workers or contracting with companies that use them directly or indirectly. ∙ End Benefits and Incentives for Illegal Presence: Terminate all non-emergency public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including in-state college tuition and enrollment in public schools (while preserving emergency medical care); deny all taxpayer-funded grants, incentives, and subsidies (including Texas Enterprise Fund grants and tax abatements) to companies that employ foreign visa workers. ∙ Remittance Tax for Enforcement: Impose a tax on cash and app-based remittances to foreign nations to help fund Texas immigration enforcement efforts.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Citizen-only STEM doctoral fellowship eligibility",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "border-scoped",
          "requirement": "Exclude unlawful-presence recipients from this newly created public fellowship through an express citizenship condition.",
          "official_requirement": "Terminate all non-emergency public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including in-state college tuition and enrollment in public schools (while preserving emergency medical care)",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 61.933",
          "excerpt": "be a United States citizen",
          "reason": "Initial eligibility requires US citizenship, applicable research-security clearance, high achievement, research doctorate enrollment and additional board requirements; Texas residents preferred. Citizenship gate excludes unlawful-presence applicants within this program."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 61.931–.932",
            "assessment": "Defines and establishes STEM doctoral research fellowship using appropriated/available funds; institution contracts and advisory committees implement the program. Creating this program is not termination of all existing benefits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 61.933",
            "assessment": "Initial eligibility requires US citizenship, applicable research-security clearance, high achievement, research doctorate enrollment and additional board requirements; Texas residents preferred. Citizenship gate excludes unlawful-presence applicants within this program.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "border-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 61.934",
            "assessment": "Continuing eligibility requires satisfactory GPA, applicable clearance and board conditions; award limit five years. Do not misstate citizenship as an expressly repeated continuing condition.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 61.935–.936",
            "assessment": "Permits public/private gifts and donations; board rules determine amounts and uses and may omit negotiated rulemaking. No employment or corporate visa-worker subsidy rule is created.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 2–3",
            "assessment": "Rules as soon as practicable; conditional immediate effect or September 1, 2025. Engrossed proposal does not establish actual awards.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Exclude unlawful-presence recipients from this newly created public fellowship through an express citizenship condition.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 220",
      "priority": "life",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00220E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "8b3f48e5e0de476dd71516733301f40c103412185dca453922cdd39f908a6cb0",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "8b3f48e5e0de476dd71516733301f40c103412185dca453922cdd39f908a6cb0",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Protect the Sanctity of Every Human Life: We call on lawmakers to affirm the sanctity of every human life, created in the image of God, by securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death. The Legislature must repeal Penal Code Sections 19.06, 22.12, and Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 71.003(c); pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking; hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life; protect fetal life from destructive practices, such as IVF (in vitro fertilization) and commercial surrogacy; promote Natural Procreative Technologies (NaPro) to help women conceive children naturally; protect vulnerable patients at any stage of life from involuntary termination in medical settings.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Emergency contraception limited to ovulation delay, with pregnancy-termination prohibition",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "life-scope",
          "requirement": "Prohibit pregnancy-terminating drugs/devices in the specified sexual-assault emergency-care provision.",
          "official_requirement": "securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 323.004(b-2)",
          "excerpt": "terminates a pregnancy",
          "reason": "Expressly prohibits providing or offering a drug/device that terminates a pregnancy; this is the affirmative scoped protection, not an inference from the bill title."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 323.004(b)(1)–(8)",
            "assessment": "Retains forensic examination, privacy where available, advocacy, information, STI prophylaxis and crisis/shower services; these are existing survivor services, not newly created life-protection achievements.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 323.004(b)(9)",
            "assessment": "New duty is consent-based and clinically indicated, limited to FDA-approved emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy by delaying ovulation. This statutory mechanism precedes fertilization; the record makes no independent medical efficacy claim.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 323.004(b-2)",
            "assessment": "Expressly prohibits providing or offering a drug/device that terminates a pregnancy; this is the affirmative scoped protection, not an inference from the bill title.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2 and retained323.004(a)–(d) context",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date in an engrossed proposal; retained transfer, documented consent, trained examination and federal EMTALA obligations remain context. No criminal penalties or universal equal-protection enactment is claimed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-scope"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Prohibit pregnancy-terminating drugs/devices in the specified sexual-assault emergency-care provision.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.323.htm",
          "sha256": "12e1bf26e257e3da5177f58036b3fdff5d75b5deacfe82a31c7167407af6d44c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:57.701Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1835",
      "priority": "border",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01835E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "4a36c9ee2fdc04a795b17a90178e98ed5f96ee681f35b29f7de80d10a345d907",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "4a36c9ee2fdc04a795b17a90178e98ed5f96ee681f35b29f7de80d10a345d907",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To secure the Texas border, strengthen immigration enforcement, deter illegal immigration, and protect Texas taxpayers and sovereignty, we propose these core reforms: Local Cooperation with Federal Enforcement: Require all local jurisdictions to fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities, including maximum participation in the 287(g) Program (Immigration and Nationality Act) for removals. ∙ Penalties for Sanctuary Policies: Empower the Texas Attorney General to prosecute local government officials who interfere with or obstruct immigration enforcement. ∙ Strengthen Border Operations: Overhaul the Texas border mission by establishing a dedicated Border Protection Unit focused on preventing illegal entry, combating human trafficking and cartel activity, and facilitating the removal of individuals unlawfully present in the United States. ∙ E-Verify and Employment Controls: Mandate E-Verify for all Texas employers with significant penalties for noncompliance; prohibit state agencies and local governments from employing foreign visa workers or contracting with companies that use them directly or indirectly. ∙ End Benefits and Incentives for Illegal Presence: Terminate all non-emergency public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including in-state college tuition and enrollment in public schools (while preserving emergency medical care); deny all taxpayer-funded grants, incentives, and subsidies (including Texas Enterprise Fund grants and tax abatements) to companies that employ foreign visa workers. ∙ Remittance Tax for Enforcement: Impose a tax on cash and app-based remittances to foreign nations to help fund Texas immigration enforcement efforts.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Lawful-presence gate for competitive-scholarship resident tuition",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "border-scope",
          "requirement": "Exclude unlawfully present nonresident students from this scholarship-based resident-tuition benefit.",
          "official_requirement": "Terminate all non-emergency public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States, including in-state college tuition and enrollment in public schools (while preserving emergency medical care)",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, new54.213(a-1)",
          "excerpt": "is otherwise lawfully present in the United States",
          "reason": "Restricts the covered nonresident scholarship benefit to citizens, lawful permanent residents, valid nonimmigrant-visa holders or other lawfully present persons. It does not exclude all foreign students."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, new54.213(a-1)",
            "assessment": "Restricts the covered nonresident scholarship benefit to citizens, lawful permanent residents, valid nonimmigrant-visa holders or other lawfully present persons. It does not exclude all foreign students.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "border-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, amended54.213(b)",
            "assessment": "Retains general five-percent cap and allows20percent only at institutions meeting low population-growth area and sufficient-space conditions under coordinating-board rules. Expansion is limited by the new lawful-presence gate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, new54.213(c), retained(a) and(d) context",
            "assessment": "Board rules implement the section. Retained(a) requires a competitive scholarship of at least$1000, competition including Texans, recognized committee and board criteria; retained(d) prevents tuition discount from reducing general-revenue appropriation. Scholarship receipt is not visa-worker employment or corporate subsidy.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scope"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections 2–3",
            "assessment": "Applies beginning2025–26 academic year; conditional immediate effective date or September1,2025. Engrossed status is not enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "border-scope"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Exclude unlawfully present nonresident students from this scholarship-based resident-tuition benefit.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.54.htm",
          "sha256": "986c575dd9e32877853c93f52bc4a4cf6bd868a308dcd437ea7b09960b7ab777",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:57.397Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 33",
      "priority": "life",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00033F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "c74f01f9e71373785bd913bfa481163e5767449d78437b02c1159d32cb2b3124",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "c74f01f9e71373785bd913bfa481163e5767449d78437b02c1159d32cb2b3124",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Protect the Sanctity of Every Human Life: We call on lawmakers to affirm the sanctity of every human life, created in the image of God, by securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death. The Legislature must repeal Penal Code Sections 19.06, 22.12, and Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 71.003(c); pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking; hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life; protect fetal life from destructive practices, such as IVF (in vitro fertilization) and commercial surrogacy; promote Natural Procreative Technologies (NaPro) to help women conceive children naturally; protect vulnerable patients at any stage of life from involuntary termination in medical settings.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Public abortion-assistance funding restrictions and civil enforcement",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "life-enforcement",
          "requirement": "Restrict covered public abortion-assistance transactions and provide enforceable civil remedies.",
          "official_requirement": "pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Sections 1–4; Government Code2273.001,2273.003–.004",
          "excerpt": "declaratory relief",
          "reason": "Adds coverage of abortion-assistance transactions and express-purpose logistical funding, and expands attorney-general civil relief to termination/reimbursement and prospective injunction, with immunity waiver. TPI treats these civil tools as aligned within this bill’s scope; this does not assert new criminal penalties, a universal funding ban or prosecution of the woman."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Repeal of named criminal/civil exceptions; criminal penalties; IVF/surrogacy restrictions; NaPro; involuntary patient termination",
          "reason": "This bill regulates public transactions and civil remedies. No credit for separate subjects and no inference that civil remedies satisfy the entire priority."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. Independent substantive audit accepted; publication requires final integration verification.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Defines assistance to include payment, travel, logistical support and specified drug distribution; broadens provider to any person performing/inducing abortion. Retained chapter applicability exceptions still limit coverage.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Extends taxpayer-resource restrictions to assistance entities for abortion/assistance purpose, subject to retained federal-conflict determination confirmed by attorney general.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Bars express-purpose logistical support including child care, travel, lodging, meals and encouragement counseling, with matching federal-conflict exception; no claim that ordinary services without this purpose are banned.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4(a)–(b)",
            "assessment": "AG civil action against transaction parties other than the woman: declaration, injunction ending and reimbursing value, prospective injunction, costs and reasonable fees; immunity waived only to created liability.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4(c)",
            "assessment": "Disallows specified defendant fee/cost awards and CPRC Chapters27 and110 defenses in these actions. Procedural enforcement change, not new criminal sanction.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained2273.001–.003 context",
            "assessment": "Taxpayer transactions exclude generally provided basic services such as utilities/police/fire and stated legislative/private-citizen expression. Chapter excludes licensed hospitals, physician offices performing50or fewer abortions per12months, state/teaching hospitals and accredited residency programs. Emergency abortion alone does not make facility an abortion provider. These limits remain and are not counted as new prohibitions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Incorporated HS171.061 and245.002",
            "assessment": "Drug definition requires intent to terminate clinically diagnosable pregnancy and knowledge of likely unborn-child death; excludes other medical uses. Abortion definition excludes contraceptives, unborn-child life/health preservation, spontaneous-loss removal and ectopic removal. Current245.002 also reflects SB31 definition changes, not attributed to SB33.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Severability applies to provisions and applications; it is not proof of judicial validity.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Effective September1,2025; no future enforcement result assumed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Restrict covered public abortion-assistance transactions and provide enforceable civil remedies.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/GV/htm/GV.2273.htm",
          "sha256": "27e5f663a4259fbb01732b83b7450914f330ba30327ade03edc34001330d7e24",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:56.064Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.171.htm",
          "sha256": "3db9f482e5a949e5e9dec4bd9b13a6a64ed94c0ef771a5ee39dcc96b9e59bcfe",
          "role": "Official current contextual definitions, copied from existing sourced review; amendment histories distinguished from SB33."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.245.htm",
          "sha256": "b3994387975f0e916faeb7ee6532ea36416ae9b331899048025c358bb4ff057d",
          "role": "Official current contextual definitions, copied from existing sourced review; amendment histories distinguished from SB33."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 95",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00095E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "46b2944ec71548d98a8099a99b017e5f0a38324cf43200d124ca2e78adeebd91",
      "decision_source_sha256": "46b2944ec71548d98a8099a99b017e5f0a38324cf43200d124ca2e78adeebd91",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Written informed consent for child immunization",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Strengthen the written informed-consent obligation and its remedies for persons already authorized to consent to a child’s immunization.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–6; FA32.002,32.101,32.1011; CPRC41.003–.004",
          "excerpt": "Before administering an immunization to a child, a health care provider must obtain the written informed consent",
          "reason": "Moves the consent duty expressly to the provider; requires benefits/risks information and applicable federal vaccine information; supplies conditional civil damages and manufacturer-remuneration safeguards. Existing authorized-consenter rules remain: parents are not the only persons who can consent; §32.101 includes specified relatives/guardians/others and §32.1011 permits defined pregnant or parenting minors to consent to their own immunization. Those retained exceptions are not newly created or counted as new parental achievements. Written consent under §32.002 identifies the child, known parent/guardian, consenting person and relationship, treatment and start date. New damages up to $10,000 require BOTH lack of required written consent and an adverse reaction required by federal law to be reported; a VAERS report alone is not proof of causation. Section 3(e) disapplies CPRC41.003 exemplary-damages proof/unanimity standards and41.004 recovery restrictions for this action. Manufacturer payments beyond necessary administration costs invalidate consent and trigger the prescribed licensing penalty. Section4 withdraws the specified liability protection absent required consent while retaining the negligence exception. These changes support meaningful authorized family consent; this score does not endorse the legislative finding as clinical evidence."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Strengthen the written informed-consent obligation and its remedies for persons already authorized to consent to a child’s immunization.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Legislative finding explains remuneration rationale; not independently credited as proven medical evidence.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Heading amendment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Written informed consent, required information, absent-consenter written form, conditional civil remedy/costs, CPRC exclusions, remuneration prohibition with necessary-cost exception, invalidation and mandatory licensing penalty.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Removes specified liability protection when required written consent is absent; negligence exception remains.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Prospective causes of action only.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect with required vote or September 1,2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.32.htm",
          "status": 200,
          "sha256": "00c286890ececcf8f88fae696b0f62f180af9515329eb1da703e9a1b480f5787",
          "bytes": 33749,
          "retrieved": "2026-11-02T02:32:16.267Z",
          "representation": "Current official compilation; not automatically historical law at bill version"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CP/htm/CP.41.htm",
          "status": 200,
          "sha256": "2f84a84b27e84971d11e08936e67de373dafa9b1cd01a656f84afa809453c603",
          "bytes": 32962,
          "retrieved": "2026-11-02T02:32:16.174Z",
          "representation": "Current official compilation; not automatically historical law at bill version"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "No completed numerical review was published for this bill–priority pair before this assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 827",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00827F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "53cdc4788177d2d98efb86f646fb47b0fd1224e50b75520939a311fdf835de84",
      "decision_source_sha256": "46b14dff28c326c719d28006a0ace6e84a148ca80057d7f5b46a1ed66c59fea1",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Sample hand-count and statewide risk-limiting election audits",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-precinct-auditing",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Sample hand-count and statewide risk-limiting election audits",
          "official_requirement": "provide for cost effective precinct auditing",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–2, Election Code 127.201,127.302",
          "excerpt": "select the polling locations and precincts at random",
          "reason": "Requires separate samples of election-day and early-voting locations and mail-ballot precincts, uses the early-voting ballot board, permits additional samples, broadens watcher access and publishes audit results. Statewide risk-limiting audits include all counties regardless of counting method. TPI treats sampling and reuse of existing board personnel as the cost-conscious auditing mechanism; this is not a claim of measured savings. Audit deadlines concern verification after initial tabulation, not permission to defer initial precinct counting."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other unchanged election-priority reforms",
          "reason": "Proof of citizenship, photo ID, voting days, initial counting, party affiliation, finance, offices and election dates receive no credit unless actually changed by this bill. Retained or referenced procedures are not assumed to create new voting authorizations. Exceptions and adverse changes must still be assessed within the actual scope."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(a)",
            "assessment": "Separate one-percent-or-three minimum samples for election-day, early-voting and mail-ballot pools; random selection, 72-hour start and 21-day completion generally.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b)",
            "assessment": "Secretary selects locations/precincts and up to three offices and three propositions for specified statewide/general/primary elections.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b-1)",
            "assessment": "Uses early-voting ballot-board members; replacement appointment by 87.002.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b-2)",
            "assessment": "In statewide risk-limiting audit election, hand count begins first business day after certification; completes by later of day 30 or Secretary-designated deadline. This concerns audit sequencing, not initial counting.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b-3)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Allows additional samples, posts notice and expands qualifying watcher access with Chapter 33 appointment rules.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(e)–(g)",
            "assessment": "Report and county-web publication within three days of completion; retained exclusion of direct-recording electronic machine tabulation is disclosed, not newly introduced.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "All counties join selected statewide risk-limiting audit races/measures regardless of counting method; Secretary sets start/completion dates instead of prior 24-hour formulas. Timing delegation is express law, not an unlawful waiver.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective-date clause; enrolled version assessed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-auditing"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.127.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/EL.127.htm",
          "sha256": "4603ae64c4ebd27e42e1bd40cf96d87d7339aad757c290cb0efa0e3d1533a294",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.563Z",
          "locator": "127.201,127.302",
          "role": "Current audit framework used as context only; additions/deletions determined from exact enrolled source."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Sample hand-count and statewide risk-limiting election audits"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 511",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00511E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ada127bd6f39010c41c826c76184ea3a2dccb08acf7fb0ca5a54ee885c6e3e8e",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ada127bd6f39010c41c826c76184ea3a2dccb08acf7fb0ca5a54ee885c6e3e8e",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Penalties for prohibited official distribution of unrequested registration forms",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-procedure-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Penalties for prohibited official distribution of unrequested registration forms",
          "official_requirement": "enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Election Code 13.009(a)–(f)",
          "excerpt": "An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor",
          "reason": "Creates distribution restrictions in official-duty capacity and bans contracts using public funds to bypass them, backed by Class C and Class A offenses respectively. Explicit code exceptions, political-party/elected-official/candidate distribution permission and notice rules define the new restriction. No penalty is claimed for conduct the statute permits."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other unchanged election-priority reforms",
          "reason": "Proof of citizenship, photo ID, voting days, initial counting, party affiliation, finance, offices and election dates receive no credit unless actually changed by this bill. Retained or referenced procedures are not assumed to create new voting authorizations. Exceptions and adverse changes must still be assessed within the actual scope."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(a)",
            "assessment": "Restricts official-duty distribution to unrequesting recipients except otherwise provided by Election Code, including Chapters 13 and 20.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b)",
            "assessment": "Forbids third-party public-funds contracts distributing forms the official could not distribute.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(c)",
            "assessment": "Expressly permits political parties, elected officials and candidates to distribute unrequested forms; scope exception disclosed, not a claim that all unsolicited distribution is forbidden.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(d)",
            "assessment": "Requires availability notice in English, Spanish and other applicable 272.011 languages. Registration availability notice is not a ballot; no English-only-ballot conflict inferred.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(e)–(f)",
            "assessment": "Class C violation of (a), Class A violation of (b); grouped once as procedural enforcement.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Proposed September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.13.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/EL.13.htm",
          "sha256": "d57401a51f8140bad7e5bf8a8e88af72157eb18ad0167b5167a5f4cd7f74daa1",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.606Z",
          "locator": "Chapter 13",
          "role": "Existing registration procedures retained by express exception."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.20.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/EL.20.htm",
          "sha256": "e1d9be7af5d794c9ec3e64714a3fd3512b920f25d2d550020557067685d168dd",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.529Z",
          "locator": "20.001,20.032",
          "role": "Agency registration duties expressly preserved, including opportunity to complete forms."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.272.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/EL.272.htm",
          "sha256": "4697e3ede3d0a9555c9e9a4c9d3ef1a728a3d46fa362054a1161737c0cce906b",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.497Z",
          "locator": "272.011",
          "role": "Additional-language materials context for the notice; notice does not become a ballot."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Penalties for prohibited official distribution of unrequested registration forms"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 972",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00972E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "b25269555bf597f21c8336ce700647584dde784150b143588d0ca288c9121797",
      "decision_source_sha256": "b25269555bf597f21c8336ce700647584dde784150b143588d0ca288c9121797",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Disability-related residence exemption for qualifying relatives",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Disability-related residence exemption for qualifying relatives",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.38",
          "excerpt": "is entitled to an exemption",
          "reason": "Creates a specified partial exemption for non-homestead real property that is the primary residence of an adult with an intellectual or developmental disability related to the owner or trustee within the third degree of consanguinity. Amount follows 11.13(b), not a fixed amount inferred from a later statute. Property already qualifying under 11.13 is excluded. Constitutional voter approval is an express condition."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Defines disabilities by HR 112.042 and HS 591.003; excludes existing 11.13 homesteads; creates the related-person residence exemption.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds 11.38 to continuing exemptions in 11.43(c); qualification and ownership changes still end exemption, and appraiser can require a new application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 only if specified constitutional amendment is approved; otherwise no effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HR/htm/HR.112.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/HR.112.htm",
          "sha256": "b29854762532cf35a808da25bc683c737fb138edc5e445f40fecfa4967c51b32",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.540Z",
          "locator": "112.042",
          "role": "Incorporated developmental-disability definition; operative definition predates this bill."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.591.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/HS.591.htm",
          "sha256": "fbf4a770bf04c974180b9faa35b15b03d95dbcc98db0dc172aa9d528286060e5",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.414Z",
          "locator": "591.003(7-a)",
          "role": "Incorporated intellectual-disability definition."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d3b3e1825764e0fa5b2f4965d6ee0cbcc46d7865bdfc6796d4b0b2c7730c4a82",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.721Z",
          "locator": "11.13(b),11.43(c)",
          "role": "Amount cross-reference and continuing-application conditions; current code is context, not substitution for the assessed engrossed bill."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Disability-related residence exemption for qualifying relatives"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4580",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04580E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "69cb30ef173655a1afffa2bdd35f53a581e921e9a7b7abda395105d06ed25244",
      "decision_source_sha256": "69cb30ef173655a1afffa2bdd35f53a581e921e9a7b7abda395105d06ed25244",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Agricultural, youth and educational nonprofit property exemption",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Agricultural, youth and educational nonprofit property exemption",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.23(n)",
          "excerpt": "is entitled to an exemption",
          "reason": "Exempts qualifying nonprofit property held for agricultural, youth-development and educational purposes in a county of at least 3.3 million. Incidental use is allowed only with revenue benefiting the organization beneficiaries. Any for-profit lessee interest remains excluded. This is scoped exemption eligibility, not tax elimination for every nonprofit or tenant."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Creates specified nonprofit exemption, county threshold and charitable/educational/scientific organization condition; incidental-use qualification and for-profit lessee exclusion delimit the property receiving relief.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds exemption to 11.43(c) continuing-application rules; no independent tax achievement.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax years only.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Harmonizes with nonsubstantive code corrections.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Proposed January 1, 2026 effective date, not evidence of enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/BO/htm/BO.22.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/BO.22.htm",
          "sha256": "777cf9c461e8929978e1cc43d33ee09d51cfe30c1a9d1886340c14d169acc341",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.772Z",
          "locator": "22.001(5)",
          "role": "Nonprofit corporation means income not distributable to members/directors/officers except statutory allowance; not a generic label."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d3b3e1825764e0fa5b2f4965d6ee0cbcc46d7865bdfc6796d4b0b2c7730c4a82",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.721Z",
          "locator": "11.43(c)",
          "role": "Retained continuing-exemption application conditions."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Agricultural, youth and educational nonprofit property exemption"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2027",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02027F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "c82ceac6cb74e89ed0b931a01cd8caf95672f2977180133a2c0d4c4d606fbadc",
      "decision_source_sha256": "c82ceac6cb74e89ed0b931a01cd8caf95672f2977180133a2c0d4c4d606fbadc",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "County abatement agreements involving Port Freeport district property",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "County abatement agreements involving Port Freeport district property",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Special District Local Laws Code 5002.203",
          "excerpt": "exempt all or a portion of the value",
          "reason": "Expressly authorizes county abatement agreements for specified leasehold interests and personal property or improvements on district property in a reinvestment zone. Zone designation must satisfy 312.202 as if designated by a municipality. Other terms remain governed by Chapter 312. This is discretionary, conditional abatement authority, not an automatic or permanent exemption."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(a)",
            "assessment": "Extends notwithstanding clause to both Subchapters B and C; permits district request for zone designation on district-owned property, retains 312.202 eligibility and removes reference to an area.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b)",
            "assessment": "Express county agreement authority for all or part of specified leasehold, tangible-personal-property or improvement value in the zone.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(c)",
            "assessment": "Other agreement terms governed by Chapter 312, including applicable agreement conditions; no claim that all Chapter 312 restrictions disappear.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect requires constitutional two-thirds vote, otherwise September 1, 2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.312.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/TX.312.htm",
          "sha256": "d11d5aed03e5869d77401fe28408b5c579afbff7b9eb68b63c7d9439a00ba560",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.533Z",
          "locator": "312.202,312.204,312.205,312.401–.402",
          "role": "Zone eligibility and agreement framework. Abatements require agreements, have statutory duration/terms and do not automatically eliminate all taxes. Current code used only to explain incorporated framework."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "County abatement agreements involving Port Freeport district property"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HJR 133",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HJ00133E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ec3278a4654053136b23e909d7235d2efa0014bf170eeb85f5248c1f2c0712ee",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ec3278a4654053136b23e909d7235d2efa0014bf170eeb85f5248c1f2c0712ee",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Constitutional exemption authority for qualifying service-related-death surviving spouses",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Constitutional exemption authority for qualifying service-related-death surviving spouses",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Article VIII 1-b(q)–(r)",
          "excerpt": "may provide that the surviving spouse",
          "reason": "Authorizes general law exempting all or part of a qualifying surviving spouse homestead where the veteran died of a condition or disease presumed service-connected under federal law, provided the spouse has not remarried. Replacement-homestead relief is limited to the prior last-year dollar amount. The proposal enables a law; election submission does not prove adoption."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(q)",
            "assessment": "Adds constitutional authority for specified spouse exemption, service-connected presumption and no-remarriage conditions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(r)",
            "assessment": "Authorizes transfer of the prior exemption dollar amount to a subsequent homestead while spouse remains unmarried.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Temporary provision sets prospective January 1, 2026 operation; January 1, 2027 expiry is of this temporary provision, not the permanent exemption authority.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Calls November 4, 2025 election with stated proposition; not an adoption claim.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Constitutional exemption authority for qualifying service-related-death surviving spouses"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 985",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00985E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "881f2890616edb0f234fd682b5630e7f28d98cc9c1ac221a8f1adc46cf3de902",
      "decision_source_sha256": "881f2890616edb0f234fd682b5630e7f28d98cc9c1ac221a8f1adc46cf3de902",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Discretion to combine specified county election precincts",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-precinct-consolidation",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Discretion to combine specified county election precincts",
          "official_requirement": "limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Election Code 42.0051",
          "excerpt": "may combine county election precincts",
          "reason": "Adds redistricting-related consolidation discretion for precincts below 3,000 registered voters to avoid unreasonable equipment, supply and personnel expenses; removes former county-population/program limitation for that pathway. It changes precinct consolidation, not authorization to vote anywhere in a county. Retains alternate suitable-location route and anti-dilution safeguards. Subsection (b) literally refers to (a) or (b); that self-reference is disclosed, not silently repaired."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other unchanged election-priority reforms",
          "reason": "Proof of citizenship, photo ID, voting days, initial counting, party affiliation, finance, offices and election dates receive no credit unless actually changed by this bill. Retained or referenced procedures are not assumed to create new voting authorizations. Exceptions and adverse changes must still be assessed within the actual scope."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(a)",
            "assessment": "Creates redistricting-related less-than-3,000 consolidation pathway despite district-boundary rule 42.005.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(b)",
            "assessment": "Applies 42.006 maximum to combined precinct under (a) or (b); self-reference retained as drafted.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(c)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Retains unsuitable-polling-location route for stated non-countywide program circumstances and 10,000-voter maximum for that route.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(e)",
            "assessment": "Retains prohibition on protected-group dilution/discouragement.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(f)",
            "assessment": "Treats combined precinct as one for presiding/alternate judge appointments under Chapter 32.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Proposed September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-precinct-consolidation"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.42.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/EL.42.htm",
          "sha256": "68e74e226a6405a7968e6c613cd7412da22c3105cb99a1dc28e24bf3e01e1c02",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.566Z",
          "locator": "42.005,42.006",
          "role": "District-boundary restriction and general maximum 5,000 registered voters; current consolidated statute is not substituted for the engrossed self-reference."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Discretion to combine specified county election precincts"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2508",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02508F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "f441f858ca8b1e48623418883ff6709eecac05db72e7dd3e3127b9a9a910e3ea",
      "decision_source_sha256": "f441f858ca8b1e48623418883ff6709eecac05db72e7dd3e3127b9a9a910e3ea",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Homestead exemption for surviving spouses of veterans with qualifying PACT Act deaths",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Homestead exemption for surviving spouses of veterans with qualifying PACT Act deaths",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.136",
          "excerpt": "is entitled to an exemption",
          "reason": "Creates full appraised-value homestead exemption for the unremarried spouse married to the veteran at death where death resulted from a condition or disease presumptively service-connected under the PACT Act or implementing regulations. A disability rating is not required; date of death does not limit eligibility. Replacement-home relief is the prior last-year dollar amount. Constitutional approval and prospective tax years remain express conditions."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Defines qualifying condition/death and homestead; creates exemption; retains marriage-at-death/no-remarriage conditions; transfers dollar amount with certificate.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds 11.136 to January 1 whole-year qualification rule.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Adds continuing exemption under 11.43(c), subject to eligibility and appraiser requests.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Conforms former-home tax proration when replacement exemption applies during the year; not an independent adverse tax policy.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Provides January 1 calculation, recalculation, correction and refund mechanics for qualifying applicants.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Conforms state property-value study to exclude exempt value, not an additional exemption.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7",
            "assessment": "Applies prospectively to tax years beginning on or after effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 8",
            "assessment": "Nonsubstantive code harmonization.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 9",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 only if specified constitutional amendment is approved; otherwise no effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d3b3e1825764e0fa5b2f4965d6ee0cbcc46d7865bdfc6796d4b0b2c7730c4a82",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.721Z",
          "locator": "11.13,11.42,11.43",
          "role": "Homestead and continuing-qualification context; exact assessed bill controls. No particular medical diagnosis is inferred beyond its PACT Act reference."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Homestead exemption for surviving spouses of veterans with qualifying PACT Act deaths"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 505",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00505E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "dc881206a517f9fe9dc760a1dedb8ae548f807a798dc554514c8907afaf1039c",
      "decision_source_sha256": "dc881206a517f9fe9dc760a1dedb8ae548f807a798dc554514c8907afaf1039c",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Election-irregularity investigation and penalties for unremedied violations",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-procedure-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Election-irregularity investigation and penalties for unremedied violations",
          "official_requirement": "enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Election Code 280.001–.003",
          "excerpt": "a civil penalty of $500 for each violation not remedied",
          "reason": "Provides specified election participants an explanation/audit route and imposes $500 per violation not remedied within 30 days after notice. Further daily penalties apply when the Secretary cannot remedy on the authority behalf. Conditions are disclosed: this does not impose an automatic fine for every initial irregularity. The priority does not prohibit a cure period or demand a particular penalty amount."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other unchanged election-priority reforms",
          "reason": "Proof of citizenship, photo ID, voting days, initial counting, party affiliation, finance, offices and election dates receive no credit unless actually changed by this bill. Retained or referenced procedures are not assumed to create new voting authorizations. Exceptions and adverse changes must still be assessed within the actual scope."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1,280.001",
            "assessment": "Specified participating candidates, party chairs, presiding/alternate judges and ballot-measure committee heads can request explanations: initial response within 20 days, further response within 10 days.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1,280.002(a)–(e)",
            "assessment": "Secretary determines adequacy within 30 days; inadequate information triggers audit at authority expense, mandatory cooperation, findings notices; may determine violation on submitted evidence without audit.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1,280.002(f)–(g)",
            "assessment": "Following audit determination of violation, Secretary may appoint conservator for two federal election cycles at county expense.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1,280.003(a)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Special violation notice; 30-day remedy period; $500 per unremedied violation, possible Secretary remedy; additional daily penalty only if Secretary cannot remedy.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1,280.003(d)–(f)",
            "assessment": "Publishes penalty record; Attorney General recovery action authorized; receipts to general revenue.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Request process only for elections held on or after effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Proposed September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-procedure-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Election-irregularity investigation and penalties for unremedied violations"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4240",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04240E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "22f97dfaa40acb7b325b8e496069946e6a5c8166634e78110544fe7e29d6a45a",
      "decision_source_sha256": "22f97dfaa40acb7b325b8e496069946e6a5c8166634e78110544fe7e29d6a45a",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Charitable exemption for organizations supporting specified medical-care institutions",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections and substantive changes reviewed. One satisfied criterion of weight 1 yields 100 under the approved scoped method. This is an ordinal alignment anchor within the stated scope, not a percentage of the entire priority achieved, adoption probability or empirical effectiveness.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Charitable exemption for organizations supporting specified medical-care institutions",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Tax Code 11.18(a),(d)(27)",
          "excerpt": "providing financial support for medical care",
          "reason": "Adds financial support for medical care at an institution described in Education Code 63.101 as a qualifying charitable function. Adds that function to the eligible mineral-interest provision, subject to retained donated-or-unsevered condition and other charitable-organization requirements. The referenced list covers multiple institutions, not only UTMB; retained charitable functions (1)–(26) are not new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(a)",
            "assessment": "Adds paragraph (27) organizations to qualifying mineral interests under retained donated-or-unsevered rule; retains existing buildings/property framework.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1(d)",
            "assessment": "Adds medical-care financial support at 63.101 institutions as charitable function (27); rest of long function list retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Proposed January 1, 2026 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI analysis under custom scoped criteria, not an official RPT grade. All conditions and scope limits remain part of the assessment. No production publication authorized by this artifact.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.63.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/ED.63.htm",
          "sha256": "df319658c8b7b780b973ad550a14cbd35d99bd32f54545132cd948a3565059ed",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.443Z",
          "locator": "63.101(a)",
          "role": "Enumerated medical/higher-education institutions; not a single hospital."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/TX/htm/TX.11.htm",
          "file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/tax_elections/context/TX.11.htm",
          "sha256": "d3b3e1825764e0fa5b2f4965d6ee0cbcc46d7865bdfc6796d4b0b2c7730c4a82",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:28:54.721Z",
          "locator": "11.18(a),(e)–(h)",
          "role": "Retained charitable qualification and property-use restrictions; bill does not exempt all property of every medical donor."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored; no earlier numeric value is overwritten by this candidate."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Charitable exemption for organizations supporting specified medical-care institutions"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 22",
      "priority": "property-tax",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00022F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "d12d137d51c88d0fd59e8a6e3d445c7c5368ce8233c69b3d3ef3515cd351fcce",
      "decision_source_sha256": "d12d137d51c88d0fd59e8a6e3d445c7c5368ce8233c69b3d3ef3515cd351fcce",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "We call on the Legislature to immediately develop and implement a plan that eliminates property taxes for all property owners: the plan should be a net tax cut, thus requiring fiscal discipline, zero-based budgeting, and spending restraint at all levels of government, and the plan should require two-thirds of voters to increase the overall tax burden, adopt new debt, or exceed spending limits.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Elimination of intangible personal-property taxation",
      "scope_explanation": "All five sections, including every listed repealer, reviewed. One TPI elimination-only criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. The operative change removes the remaining intangible-property exception and related administration. This is not elimination of real/tangible property tax or a measured statewide net cut.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "tax-scoped-elimination",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Remove the remaining property-tax authorization for intangible personal property and its related tax administration.",
          "official_requirement": "eliminates property taxes for all property owners",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–3; Tax Code 11.02(a),42.05 and listed repealers",
          "excerpt": "Intangible personal property is not taxable.",
          "reason": "Section 1 makes intangible personal property categorically nontaxable rather than subject to the former 11.02(b) exception. The historical exception concerns specified insurance-company and savings-and-loan intangibles. Section 3 removes that exception and jurisdiction paragraph, intangible situs rules and special valuation cross-references. Section 2 removes the transportation-intangibles appeal-party clause while preserving railroad rolling-stock appeals. These are aligned or conforming changes within the intangible-tax scope; no arbitrary deduction for absent budgeting/voter conditions is imposed under the approved custom method.",
          "excerpt_representation": "Operative text with struck language and deletion brackets omitted"
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Net tax cut; zero-based budgeting; spending restraint; two-thirds voter controls",
          "reason": "Explicitly excluded from numerical calculation by the approved TPI custom tax method. They remain in the unchanged official RPT quotation. No claim of satisfying these separate conditions."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Property outside the specified exemption or authority",
          "reason": "Outside this bill’s operative scope; not counted as satisfied. Full scoped credit does not claim all-owner tax elimination."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 11.02(a)",
            "assessment": "Deletes the exception and makes intangible personal property nontaxable.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2, 42.05",
            "assessment": "Deletes comptroller-party provision for transportation-business intangible appeals; preserves railroad rolling-stock appeals.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3(1),11.02(b)-(c)",
            "assessment": "Repeals the remaining specified-intangible taxability exception and resident/business-location jurisdiction rule.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3(2)-(4),21.06-.08",
            "assessment": "Repeals general intangible situs, transportation-intangible county allocation, and financial-institution situs cross-references; no tangible/real-property rule is removed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3(5)-(6),23.15-.16",
            "assessment": "Repeals insurance-company and savings-and-loan intangible appraisal cross-references.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Prospective tax-year application, not retroactive cancellation.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "January 1, 2026 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "tax-scoped-elimination"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "Proposed TPI analysis, not an official RPT grade. Constitutional and local-adoption conditions are disclosed rather than scored as passage probability. Possible shifts in other taxpayers’ burdens are not evidence of statewide net tax savings; the approved custom calculation excludes a net-cut criterion.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending historical repealer verification and the now-approved elimination-only scope rule."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://henderson-cad.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/2023-Texas-Property-Tax-Code-96-297-23.pdf",
          "status": 200,
          "bytes": 3112103,
          "sha256": "11d09ecc540f02716e3a1151c4c186c5d42c629b483a69670abb39cce0e47e4c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:21:31.486Z",
          "publisher": "Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts; 2023 edition hosted by Henderson County Appraisal District",
          "locator": "2023 Comptroller Tax Code: PDF pages 63 (11.02),126–127 (21.06–.08),157 (23.15–.16),340 (42.05)",
          "role": "Pre-amendment statutory text for each repeal and the appeal-party deletion; edition and host explicitly identified."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/analysis/html/HB00022E.htm",
          "sha256": "64761f8af4bb3b3b1efaabd71e00b63a7c8b50e61d9f0f0ab8b0b59d37c1d047",
          "locator": "Senate Research Center section-by-section analysis, April 25, 2025",
          "role": "Corroborates function of all listed repealers; enrolled text independently compared."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 400",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00400E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "12e47b4adca3787658b87cb4f1b8f88a27955ce883d61de2f7c6ce2f41f41c3d",
      "decision_source_sha256": "027fa726bb7bcec74e8d8deb5880e0eded16daa17b5a6b5b0a9cde92680dc860",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Signed parental consent for specified school psychological activities and recordings",
      "scope_explanation": "All three operative sections reviewed under one TPI scoped parental-rights criterion, weight 1. Signed permission and the prohibition on participation without returned consent supply the alignment mechanism; a school or counseling label alone supplies no credit. One satisfied criterion yields 100. Exceptions and retained law remain disclosed; no claim that all mental-health activity is harmful or that all priority demands are implemented.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-parental-consent",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require returned signed parental consent for covered school psychological examinations, tests, treatments, video and voice recordings, subject to stated exceptions.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Education Code 26.009(a), (a-1), (a-2), (c)",
          "excerpt": "A child may not participate in the activity unless the district receives the parent's signed written consent to that activity.",
          "reason": "Extends and defines the school-employee consent requirement, including psychological tests presented as surveys, check-ins, screenings or embedded lessons and defined treatment. Requires a signed form returned before participation. General well-being questions, child-consented counseling under Family Code 32.004, abuse reporting/investigation and legally required child-protection/special-education activities remain. The child-consent exception concerns suicide prevention, chemical dependency and abuse; it is not blanket permission for every counseling program. This assesses the additional parental-control mechanism, not a categorical ban on mental-health services. The new signed-returned-consent rule applies to all activities in subsection (a), including covered video and voice recordings. Retained subsection (b) recording exceptions cover safety/order in common areas or buses, cocurricular/extracurricular activities, regular classroom instruction, media coverage, and student safety under 29.022; these are not newly created by SB400."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Elimination of funding and implementation of qualified harmful programs or materials",
          "reason": "This bill changes permission procedures, not funding or a categorical program prohibition. No evidence establishes that all defined activities interfere with family formation or privacy. The direct documented parental-control mechanism is counted once under parental rights, without a second award for presumed harm."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Hiring and contract screening; Independent Inspector General; retroactive Do Not Hire; penalty tiers; NDA bans; whistleblower retaliation remedies; adoption, divorce, parenting presumptions; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "None of the three sections changes these separate requirements."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require returned signed parental consent for covered school psychological examinations, tests, treatments, video and voice recordings, subject to stated exceptions.",
      "interpretation_note": "100 is TPI’s full-alignment anchor for the assessed provisions, not measured 100% policy fulfillment, an official RPT grade, or proof that the entire priority is implemented. Scope limits and retained law remain disclosed.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_thread": "01a19985-e1a8-73c5-a728-fae2d19910d1"
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.009(a)",
            "assessment": "Adds consent manner and explicit treatment coverage; preserves 38.004 and special-education exceptions and the recording rule’s reference to retained subsection (b).",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.009(a-1)",
            "assessment": "Defines psychological examinations/tests and treatments by function, including disguised or embedded methods; not a finding that every covered activity is harmful.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.009(a-2)",
            "assessment": "Requires returned signed parental consent before all covered subsection (a) activities, including video and voice recordings subject to retained subsection (b) exceptions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 26.009(c)",
            "assessment": "Preserves general well-being questions, specified child-consented counseling and abuse reporting/investigations. These clarify boundaries and are not independently treated as new adverse rights removals.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies beginning with 2025–2026 school year.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Immediate-effect vote condition or September 1, 2025 fallback; Senate engrossment is not treated as enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-parental-consent"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored while broad-scope and harmful-program questions were unresolved; this proposal evaluates the actual consent mechanism under the approved scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.32.htm",
          "sha256": "00c286890ececcf8f88fae696b0f62f180af9515329eb1da703e9a1b480f5787",
          "locator": "32.004",
          "role": "Existing incorporated exception; not newly created by SB400."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.38.htm",
          "sha256": "af5593d7f83d70ede010c2e6c9ccce580b8c1f4f82468af1740f5a3ee5db897d",
          "locator": "38.004",
          "role": "Existing incorporated exception; not newly created by SB400."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.26.htm",
          "sha256": "857b1f8df36dfb9c2803d424dfd682fd48602dabf45e028904a01130579dd0b3",
          "locator": "26.009(b)",
          "role": "Current compilation used only for retained recording exceptions. Later SB12 additions, contractor coverage and renumbering are not attributed to SB400."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1773",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01773E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "54f1bea099b796e8e75e1c8afe27bd99ad0f1c9f4dcce5ffd43d684261df1cf3",
      "decision_source_sha256": "54f1bea099b796e8e75e1c8afe27bd99ad0f1c9f4dcce5ffd43d684261df1cf3",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parental permission for appointment as a nonvoting student trustee",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require parental permission for the optional student-trustee participation established by this bill.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Education Code11.0512(a)–(c)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Subchapter C, Chapter 11, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 11.0512 to read as follows: Sec. 11.0512. STUDENT TRUSTEE. (a) This section applies only to a school district to which Section 11.0511 does not apply. (b) In addition to the number of trustees of a school district as provided by Section 11.051, the board of trustees of a school district may appoint a student trustee in the manner and for a term prescribed by the board. A student is eligible for appointment as a student trustee only if the student: (1) is enrolled in or will be entering the 11th or 12th grade and is considered in good standing academically and under the district code of conduct; and (2) has received parental permission to participate. (c) A student trustee is not a member of the board of trustees of the school district for which the student is appointed. A student trustee has the same powers and duties as a member of the board of trustees, including the right to attend and participate in open meetings of the board, except that the student trustee: (1) may not vote on any matter before the board or make or second any motion before the board; (2) is not counted in determining whether a quorum exists for a meeting of the board or in determining the outcome of any vote of the board; (3) may not attend or participate in a closed session of the board; and (4) is not entitled to receive compensation or reimbursement of the student trustee's expenses for services on the board.",
          "reason": "Section 1 creates an optional nonvoting student trustee position subject to parental permission, grade and standing requirements. This is concrete parental authorization over the child’s participation, not credit merely for student governance. Districts governed by §11.0511 are excluded; the bill does not expand that statute."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require parental permission for the optional student-trustee participation established by this bill.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "The permission condition aligns; optional appointment, eligibility, no vote/motion/quorum/closed-session participation and no compensation implement the defined position. No new parent access to closed sessions is asserted.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SJR 34",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SJ00034F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "d899c209f521f0df1c87eca4622fdbe3e398be0b98d1fed780ff00cb6943a993",
      "decision_source_sha256": "d899c209f521f0df1c87eca4622fdbe3e398be0b98d1fed780ff00cb6943a993",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Proposed constitutional parental decision rights",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Expressly recognize parents’ fundamental care, custody and control rights in the proposed constitutional provision.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; proposed Texas Constitution ArticleI,Section37",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Article I, Texas Constitution, is amended by adding Section 37 to read as follows: Sec. 37. To enshrine truths that are deeply rooted in this nation's history and traditions, the people of Texas hereby affirm that a parent has the responsibility to nurture and protect the parent's child and the corresponding fundamental right to exercise care, custody, and control of the parent's child, including the right to make decisions concerning the child's upbringing.",
          "reason": "Adds a proposed constitutional recognition of parental care, custody, control and upbringing decisions, paired with responsibility to nurture and protect. Enrolled resolution status and an election date do not establish voter adoption."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Expressly recognize parents’ fundamental care, custody and control rights in the proposed constitutional provision.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "The proposed constitutional text explicitly recognizes parental rights and responsibilities.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Submission at the November 4, 2025 election, ballot language and implementation; no claim that voters adopted it.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 5394",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB05394F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "36685b546612de51c8e5b073112fa862851230472b720ebdcf73eaf0b2de3c24",
      "decision_source_sha256": "36685b546612de51c8e5b073112fa862851230472b720ebdcf73eaf0b2de3c24",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Limits on additional kinship caregiver requirements",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Prevent contractors and child-placing agencies from adding unauthorized requirements to covered relative or designated caregivers.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Family Code264.752(d)(1)–(2)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 264.752, Family Code, is amended by adding Subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) A single source continuum contractor or a child-placing agency may not: (1) subject a relative or designated caregiver to any requirement other than as provided by law or department or Health and Human Services Commission rule; or (2) adopt any policies or procedures related to a relative or designated caregiver other than as authorized by law or department or Health and Human Services Commission rule.",
          "reason": "The new §264.752(d) restricts additional requirements to law or DFPS/HHSC rules and policies to authorized ones. This protects covered family caregivers against unauthorized administrative burdens; it leaves statutory and agency safety rules intact and does not make every caregiver eligible."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Prevent contractors and child-placing agencies from adding unauthorized requirements to covered relative or designated caregivers.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Limits requirements imposed by single source continuum contractors and child-placing agencies in the covered relative/designated caregiver program.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 implementation.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 784",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00784E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "452eda199cafd6d75201c0528102ac7c885f912d786acd7fe894a039d6a84095",
      "decision_source_sha256": "452eda199cafd6d75201c0528102ac7c885f912d786acd7fe894a039d6a84095",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Peace officer families’ school transfer choices",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Expand enforceable school transfer choices for the child of a peace officer.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections1–2; Education Code12A.004(a)(3), amended25.0344(b) and new(e),(f)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 12A.004(a), Education Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) A local innovation plan may not provide for the exemption of a district designated as a district of innovation from the following provisions of this title: (1) a state or federal requirement applicable to an open-enrollment charter school operating under Subchapter D, Chapter 12; (2) Subchapters A, C, D, and E, Chapter 11, except that a district may be exempt from Sections 11.1511(b)(5) and (14) and Section 11.162; (3) transfers of students who are the children of peace officers under Section 25.0344; (4) [ [DELETED] (3) [/DELETED] ] state curriculum and graduation requirements adopted under Chapter 28; and (5) [ [DELETED] (4) [/DELETED] ] academic and financial accountability and sanctions under Chapters 39 and 39A. SECTION 2. Section 25.0344, Education Code, as added by Chapter 322 (H.B. 1959), Acts of the 88th Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, is amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (e) and (f) to read as follows: (b) On request of a peace officer who is a parent of or person standing in parental relation to a student, the board of trustees of a school district or the board's designee shall transfer the student to : (1) another district campus ; or (2) any other [ [DELETED] to another [/DELETED] ] school district in this state, regardless of whether the sending district and the receiving district have entered into [ [DELETED] under [/DELETED] ] an agreement under Section 25.035. (e) Notwithstanding any other law, both the sending district and the receiving district must approve a transfer under this section without exception. (f) A school district may not charge a tuition fee under Section 25.038 to a student who transfers to the district under this section.",
          "reason": "Adds intradistrict campus choice and transfer to any other district regardless of an agreement, mandates both districts’ approval and bars tuition under §25.038. These are concrete family education choices. It adds the transfer rule to innovation-plan restrictions prospectively, with older plans grandfathered. It does not grant all families these transfers."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Expand enforceable school transfer choices for the child of a peace officer.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Adds §25.0344 to district-of-innovation nonexempt requirements, subject to Section 3.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Expanded transfer destinations, mandatory approval by both districts and no tuition under the identified provision.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Applies the innovation restriction to plans adopted or renewed after the effective date, retaining older plans.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Begins with the 2025–2026 school year.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect with required vote, otherwise September 1, 2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1403",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01403E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ca39aeea3cb701638aa63131b449d4b1141ac81ea8f6eb5e15ac4df03895dbe7",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ca39aeea3cb701638aa63131b449d4b1141ac81ea8f6eb5e15ac4df03895dbe7",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Foster-home firearm information privacy",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Limit government and contracted placing-agency collection and use of firearm-type information from foster homes.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Human Resources Code42.042(e-6)–(e-9)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 42.042, Human Resources Code, is amended by adding Subsections (e-6), (e-7), (e-8), and (e-9) to read as follows: (e-6) The commission, the department, and a child-placing agency that contracts with the department may not require an agency foster home to: (1) disclose the specific types of firearms that are present in the home; or (2) notify the child-placing agency if there is any change in the types of firearms that are present in the home. (e-7) If the commission, the department, or a child-placing agency that contracts with the department has or obtains information relating to the types of firearms that are present in an agency foster home, the commission, department, or child-placing agency may not use that information for any purpose other than determining whether there are firearms present in the home. (e-8) A child-placing agency that violates Subsection (e-7) is liable to the state for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each violation. The attorney general may bring an action to recover a civil penalty authorized under this subsection. (e-9) Information relating to the types of firearms that are present in an agency foster home is confidential and is not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.",
          "reason": "Protects covered foster homes from demands for firearm types or change updates, restricts use of obtained information to determining whether firearms are present, and makes type information confidential. The civil penalty of not more than $5,000 applies to a placing agency’s prohibited use under (e-7), not automatically every breach of all new provisions. Presence and lawful safety requirements are not abolished."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Limit government and contracted placing-agency collection and use of firearm-type information from foster homes.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Human Resources Code §42.042(e-6) limits collection and updates; (e-7) limits use; (e-8) supplies the specified civil penalty and AG action; (e-9) makes type information confidential. These are directly documented privacy protections for covered foster families.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1141",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01141E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "f8878f42135290ef25d4fab057c73f46aad3ba361887912a3721dcac515b30e2",
      "decision_source_sha256": "f8878f42135290ef25d4fab057c73f46aad3ba361887912a3721dcac515b30e2",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Confirmation of existing DFPS notices",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require judicial confirmation of the existing notices in the covered DFPS adversary hearing.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Family Code262.2011",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Subchapter C, Chapter 262, Family Code, is amended by adding Section 262.2011 to read as follows: Sec. 262.2011. CONFIRMATION OF REQUIRED NOTICE PROVIDED. Before commencement of the full adversary hearing, the court shall, in writing and in open court, confirm with an alleged perpetrator that: (1) before interviewing the alleged perpetrator, the Department of Family and Protective Services informed the person of the person's right to: (A) create an audio or video recording of the interview under Section 261.3027; and (B) request an administrative review of the Department of Family and Protective Services' findings under Section 261.3091; and (2) when the Department of Family and Protective Services first contacted the alleged perpetrator after initiating an investigation of a parent or other person having legal custody of a child, the department provided the person with the information required by Section 261.307.",
          "reason": "Requires the court to confirm before the full adversary hearing that the alleged perpetrator received the specified recording, administrative-review and initial-contact information. It checks existing rights rather than creating those rights or an evidence-suppression remedy. This is the same limited rights-notice rationale as the already accepted HB 1534 assessment."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require judicial confirmation of the existing notices in the covered DFPS adversary hearing.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "New §262.2011 confirms the specified existing notices before the full adversary hearing.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies only to suits filed on or after the effective date; earlier suits retain former law.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 implementation.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1368",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01368E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "576d893169913440ac96be88d6338ba6f1702d86f35e901b520b11f76164648f",
      "decision_source_sha256": "576d893169913440ac96be88d6338ba6f1702d86f35e901b520b11f76164648f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent information about missing school support staff",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require notice of extended absence of the covered school nurse, counselor or librarian staffing.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Education Code25.096(a)–(i)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Subchapter C, Chapter 25, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 25.096 to read as follows: Sec. 25.096. PARENTAL NOTIFICATION CONCERNING NURSES, SCHOOL COUNSELORS, AND LIBRARIANS. (a) In this section: (1) \"Librarian\" means a person certified as a librarian under Subchapter B, Chapter 21. (2) \"Nurse\" means a person licensed under Chapter 301, Occupations Code. (3) \"School counselor\" means a person certified as a school counselor under Subchapter B, Chapter 21. (b) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (i), a public school, including an open-enrollment charter school, that does not have a full-time nurse, school counselor, or librarian or the equivalent of a full-time nurse, school counselor, or librarian assigned to be present at the school for more than 30 consecutive instructional days during the same school year shall provide written notice of the absence to the parent of or other person standing in parental relation to each student enrolled in the school. (c) A school has the equivalent of a full-time nurse under Subsection (b) if the school has two or more nurses assigned to the school and all regular student instructional hours at the campus during the regular school day are covered by the assignment of at least one nurse. (d) A school has the equivalent of a full-time school counselor under Subsection (b) if the school has two or more school counselors assigned to the school and all regular student instructional hours at the campus during the regular school day are covered by the assignment of at least one school counselor. (e) A school has the equivalent of a full-time librarian under Subsection (b) if the school has two or more librarians assigned to the school and all regular student instructional hours at the campus during the regular school day are covered by the assignment of at least one librarian. (f) The principal of the school shall provide the notice required by Subsection (b) not later than the 30th instructional day after the first day the school does not have a full-time nurse, school counselor, or librarian assigned to be present at the school. (g) The school shall: (1) make a good faith effort to ensure that the notice required by this section is provided in a bilingual form to any parent or other person standing in parental relation whose primary language is not English; and (2) retain a copy of any notice provided under this section. (h) A school may satisfy the notice requirement under Subsection (f) by posting the notice on the school's Internet website. Notice posted under this subsection must be accessible from the home page of the Internet website by use of not more than three links. (i) This section does not apply to a school district or open-enrollment charter school with a student enrollment of less than 10,000 students.",
          "reason": "Creates information for parents about a covered school’s extended lack of full-time or equivalent staff. It does not require hiring staff. Districts/charters below 10,000 enrollment are exempt; a website posting accessible within three links can satisfy notice, so direct delivery is not universal. The text uses an absence exceeding 30 consecutive instructional days and a notice deadline no later than the 30th instructional day after the absence begins; this timing tension is disclosed rather than silently corrected."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require notice of extended absence of the covered school nurse, counselor or librarian staffing.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "New §25.096 defines covered staffing, equivalents and professional qualifications; requires notice with good-faith bilingual effort and retained copy; permits website compliance and exempts smaller districts/charters. Information supports parental decision-making within this explicit coverage.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "2025–2026 school-year application.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect with required vote, otherwise September 1, 2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4535",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04535E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "b798d192d3e66df9bbd2f5cfc867eb34ffb617a892e2fba5433b776be9310ae0",
      "decision_source_sha256": "b798d192d3e66df9bbd2f5cfc867eb34ffb617a892e2fba5433b776be9310ae0",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Written consent for covered COVID-19 vaccination",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require written informed consent from an authorized parent or representative for the covered minor vaccination.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Health and Safety Code161.0086(a)–(d)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 161, Health and Safety Code, is amended by adding Section 161.0086 to read as follows: Sec. 161.0086. COVID-19 VACCINATION ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS. (a) In this section: (1) \"COVID-19\" means the 2019 novel coronavirus disease. (2) \"Health care provider\" means an individual licensed or otherwise authorized by this state to administer vaccines. (b) Before administering a COVID-19 vaccination to an individual, a health care provider must obtain the individual's written informed consent, or if the individual is a minor or lacks the mental capacity to provide informed consent, the parent, guardian, or conservator who may provide written informed consent on the individual's behalf. The informed consent required under this section must include an acknowledgment that the individual providing informed consent received the information sheet described by Subsection (c). (c) The department shall develop a standardized information sheet that includes information on: (1) the benefits and risks associated with COVID-19 vaccination, including potential side effects; (2) the expedited manner in which the COVID-19 vaccine was developed; (3) whether long-term scientific studies have been performed on the COVID-19 vaccine; (4) whether manufacturers of the COVID-19 vaccine are subject to civil liability for any injuries caused by the vaccine; and (5) the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, including clear instructions for reporting any vaccine-related injury or reaction. (d) The appropriate licensing authority may impose disciplinary action on a health care provider who administers a COVID-19 vaccination in violation of this section in the same manner and using the same procedures as the authority uses to impose disciplinary action on a provider who violates the authority's licensing or other regulatory laws or rules.",
          "reason": "Creates written informed consent for COVID-19 vaccination with acknowledgment of the standardized information sheet. For minors or persons lacking capacity the authorized parent, guardian or conservator supplies consent. Adult consent, information-sheet administration and permissive licensing discipline implement the broader bill without a conflicting parental provision. The assessment does not endorse medical propositions: the sheet must state whether long-term studies were performed, not that none exist."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Require written informed consent from an authorized parent or representative for the covered minor vaccination.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "New §161.0086 provides adult/authorized-representative consent, required information and acknowledgment, sheet preparation and licensing agencies’ discretionary use of existing discipline procedures.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3783",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03783E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "5df601eca0305364b608d9c7756ac8a2a7673f5c3be5f75d89f18d98bde720bc",
      "decision_source_sha256": "5df601eca0305364b608d9c7756ac8a2a7673f5c3be5f75d89f18d98bde720bc",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Protection from coercive court-ordered family counseling",
      "scope_explanation": "All sections of the specified version were examined. One TPI scoped parental/family-rights criterion contributes 1 at weight 1: 1/1 × 100 = 100. Broader unrelated reforms are not a denominator. Disclosed limits below define this scoped analysis; independent interpretive audit is still required.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Protect children and families from the specified isolating or coercive court-ordered counseling and joint victim-perpetrator sessions.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Family Code153.010(a),(c),(d)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 153.010, Family Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read as follows: (a) Subject to Subsections (c) and (d), if [ [DELETED] If [/DELETED] ] the court finds at the time of a hearing that the parties have a history of conflict in resolving an issue of conservatorship or possession of or access to the child, the court may order a party to[ [DELETED] : [/DELETED] [ [DELETED] (1) [/DELETED] ] participate in counseling with a mental health professional who: (1) [ [DELETED] (A) [/DELETED] ] has a background in family therapy; (2) [ [DELETED] (B) [/DELETED] ] has a mental health license that requires as a minimum a master's degree; and (3) [ [DELETED] (C) [/DELETED] ] has training in the dynamics of family [ [DELETED] domestic [/DELETED] ] violence if the court determines that the training is relevant to the type of counseling needed[ [DELETED] ; and [/DELETED] [ [DELETED] (2) pay the cost of counseling [/DELETED] ]. (c) In determining whether to order a party to participate in counseling under Subsection (a), the court shall consider evidence of family violence or sexual abuse in accordance with Section 153.004. If credible evidence of family violence or sexual abuse is presented, the court may not order counseling in which a victim of the violence or abuse participates in counseling sessions together with the perpetrator of the violence or abuse. (d) A court may not order a party to participate in counseling under Subsection (a) in which the person conducting the counseling requires: (1) the isolation of a child who is the subject of the suit from the child's family, school, religious community, other community, or other sources of support, including by prohibiting or preventing the child from contacting a parent or other family member; (2) a child who is the subject of the suit to stay overnight or for multiple days in an out-of-state location or other location, regardless of whether the child is accompanied by a parent or other family member; (3) the transportation of a child who is the subject of the suit to a location by force, threat of force, undue coercion, or other action that places the child's safety at risk; (4) a temporary or permanent change in the periods of possession of or access to a child who is the subject of the suit to which a conservator of the child would otherwise be entitled; or (5) the use of force, threat of force, undue coercion, or verbal abuse against a child who is the subject of the suit.",
          "reason": "Requires consideration of family violence/sexual abuse and bars joint victim-perpetrator counseling on credible evidence. Expressly prohibits counseling requiring isolation from family/community/support, overnight or multiday placement, coercive transport, changed possession/access, force/coercion or verbal abuse. These are documented intrusions, not harm inferred from therapy’s category. Removing this section’s explicit order-to-pay authorization is not described as a universal ban on allocating counseling costs."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "School employee screening, inspector general, Do Not Hire, educator penalty tiers/concealment/whistleblower rules; adoption and divorce; 50/50 parenting; harmful-program elimination; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These independent demands are not implemented by this bill. Neither healthcare, advisory councils, technology nor counseling is presumed harmful by category. The operative family protections described here, not topic labels, support the one applicable criterion."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Protect children and families from the specified isolating or coercive court-ordered counseling and joint victim-perpetrator sessions.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Amends §153.010: preserves qualified counseling authority, deletes express party-payment language, requires violence/abuse consideration, prohibits the specified joint sessions and coercive/isolating interventions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies to pending and newly filed suits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Makes the legal change sufficient material/substantial circumstances to seek modification of prior possession/access orders; does not itself automatically alter an order.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect with required vote, otherwise September 1, 2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2071",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02071E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "245756be65339cd8be4d74e874af5ecc60c8b39894c9379d24081b464a95edf5",
      "decision_source_sha256": "245756be65339cd8be4d74e874af5ecc60c8b39894c9379d24081b464a95edf5",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Independent medical review and parent access during child-abuse investigations",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Independent medical review and parent access during child-abuse investigations",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(c-1) For a case in which a specialty consultation is required by Subsection (c), the department shall refer the case to a physician who: (1) is licensed to practice medicine in this state under Subtitle B, Title 3, Occupations Code; (2) is board certified in a field or specialty relevant to diagnosing and treating the conditions described by Subsection (b); (3) was not involved with the report of suspected abuse or neglect ; and (4) was not involved in reviewing the case, including as a member of a review team under Section 261.312 or a multidisciplinary team under Subchapter E, Chapter 264 . (c-3) Before referring a child's case under Subsection (c), the department shall provide to the child's parent or legal guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the parent or legal guardian all medical records, including radiographs, images, and other documents used by the department and the network during the abuse or neglect investigation. (d) In providing assessments to the department as provided by Subsection (b), the network and the system must use a blind peer review process to resolve cases where physicians in the network or system disagree in the assessment of the causes of a child's injuries or in the presence of a condition listed under Subsection (b). The department shall provide to the child's parent or legal guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the parent or legal guardian the information used to resolve a case described by this subsection, including the names of the physicians, the physicians' opinions, the possible conflicting conditions, all assessments conducted on the child who is the subject of the case, and all medical records related to the child. (e-1) The department, a referring provider, including a hospital, and the network may not obstruct, prevent, or inhibit a child's parent or legal guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the parent or legal guardian from obtaining all medical records and documentation necessary to request an alternative opinion, including access to the child for that purpose by a health care professional providing an alternative or second opinion or performing diagnostic testing.",
          "reason": "Expands disqualification to prior case reviewers; supplies medical records before referral and names, opinions, conflicting conditions and assessments in peer-review disputes. Protects records and child access for second opinions. Retains qualified Texas specialist criteria and blind review. Retained 261.3017(c-2) allows referral over parental objection after good-faith collaboration; this is access and independence, not a parental veto. Excludes prior reporters/reviewers from forensic assessment, preserves investigative interviews and authority, and clarifies parent access to records. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Expands disqualification to prior case reviewers; supplies medical records before referral and names, opinions, conflicting conditions and assessments in peer-review disputes. Protects records and child access for second opinions. Retains qualified Texas specialist criteria and blind review. Retained 261.3017(c-2) allows referral over parental objection after good-faith collaboration; this is access and independence, not a parental veto.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Excludes prior reporters/reviewers from forensic assessment, preserves investigative interviews and authority, and clarifies parent access to records.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.261.htm",
          "file": "FA.261.htm",
          "sha256": "25ea0002ce06c0fd321e9c8cd4fb4e35d51ddfa0283414e90ebaf9d70bbcbe99",
          "sections": [
            "261.3017",
            "261.30175"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "261.3017, 261.30175"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Independent medical review and parent access during child-abuse investigations"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1586",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01586F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "f0bee0ac4a30736d44e4e490ec423abe1e33f3f97baeaabdf1960049ee8185d6",
      "decision_source_sha256": "f0bee0ac4a30736d44e4e490ec423abe1e33f3f97baeaabdf1960049ee8185d6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Accessible exemption forms and protection of applicants’ identifying information",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Accessible exemption forms and protection of applicants’ identifying information",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(c) The department shall develop a blank affidavit form for a person to use in claiming an exemption from a required immunization under this section and post the affidavit form in a printable format on the department's Internet website. A person claiming an exemption from a required immunization may also obtain the affidavit form by submitting a written request for the affidavit form to the department. A person may not be required to provide any information to obtain a blank affidavit form under this subsection. (d) The affidavit form shall contain a statement indicating that the person or, if a minor, the person's parent, managing conservator, or guardian understands the benefits and risks of immunizations and the benefits and risks of not being immunized. (e) The department may maintain a record of the total number of times an affidavit form was accessed on the department's Internet website or requested under Subsection (c) . The department may not maintain a record of any personally identifying information of individuals who download, access, request , or submit an affidavit form under this section.",
          "reason": "Makes blank exemption affidavit printable online without supplying information; optional written requests; removes special seal. Retains risk/benefit acknowledgment. Permits aggregate access/request count but forbids identifying records. Retained 161.0041(a)-(b) conscience/religious exemption basis and notarized signature remain; does not create a general exemption or establish medical safety. The annual legislative-report deletion is separately classified neutral. Requires form update within 30 days. Applies starting 2025–26 school year. Conditional immediate effect or September 1. Removes the mandatory annual report to the legislature and makes aggregate access/request counts optional. This administrative reporting change is neutral, not parental-rights achievement or documented privacy harm."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Makes blank exemption affidavit printable online without supplying information; optional written requests; removes special seal. Retains risk/benefit acknowledgment. Permits aggregate access/request count but forbids identifying records. Retained 161.0041(a)-(b) conscience/religious exemption basis and notarized signature remain; does not create a general exemption or establish medical safety. The annual legislative-report deletion is separately classified neutral.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Requires form update within 30 days.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Applies starting 2025–26 school year.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 161.0041(e), annual reporting deletion",
            "assessment": "Removes the mandatory annual report to the legislature and makes aggregate access/request counts optional. This administrative reporting change is neutral, not parental-rights achievement or documented privacy harm.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.161.htm",
          "file": "HS.161.htm",
          "sha256": "ba507d17062193284b8a9c66a284c96f86d5aeb03b84cb7cc555dd1b57693e89",
          "sections": [
            "161.0041"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "161.0041"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Accessible exemption forms and protection of applicants’ identifying information"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 500",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00500F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ca0f04e2665c2c513aa368a59539b32d23dfb6ea7a46afb49f119dd13d4dc68f",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ca0f04e2665c2c513aa368a59539b32d23dfb6ea7a46afb49f119dd13d4dc68f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Prospective adoptive parents’ access to child-history records with identity protection",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Prospective adoptive parents’ access to child-history records with identity protection",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(a) Except as provided by Subsection (c), the prospective adoptive parents of a child are entitled to examine the records and other information relating to the history of the child , including confidential information other than the identity of the biological parents and any other person whose identity is confidential . The Department of Family and Protective Services, licensed child-placing agency, or other person placing a child for adoption shall inform the prospective adoptive parents of their right to examine the records and other information relating to the history of the child. The department, licensed child-placing agency, or other person placing the child for adoption shall : (1) redact each social security number from the records and information; and (2) edit the records and information to protect the identity of the biological parents , any biological siblings adopted by a different family, the adoptive parents of those biological siblings, any person who made a report of abuse or neglect to the department or a law enforcement agency, and any person whose identity is confidential under Section 262.308 . (a-2) A prospective adoptive parent must sign a nondisclosure agreement before the department, licensed child-placing agency, or other person placing the child for adoption may release confidential information under this section. (a-3) The department, licensed child-placing agency, or other person placing the child for adoption shall provide the information under this section not later than the 90th day after the date the information is requested.",
          "reason": "Requires available history report distribution and DFPS delivery within 45 days of the later permanency-goal change or termination order. Allows confidential history access except protected identities; redacts SSNs and protected birth/sibling/adoptive-family/reporter/safe-haven identities. Requires confidentiality NDA and 90-day response. Retained 162.0062(c) limits automatic further review after election to proceed but expressly requires case record on request. NDA protects confidential family records, not educator misconduct concealment. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Requires available history report distribution and DFPS delivery within 45 days of the later permanency-goal change or termination order.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Allows confidential history access except protected identities; redacts SSNs and protected birth/sibling/adoptive-family/reporter/safe-haven identities. Requires confidentiality NDA and 90-day response. Retained 162.0062(c) limits automatic further review after election to proceed but expressly requires case record on request. NDA protects confidential family records, not educator misconduct concealment.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.162.htm",
          "file": "FA.162.htm",
          "sha256": "43bc9976b45c8cddb61b30704c4a1377a2823153132f44a32b8875775d3492e6",
          "sections": [
            "162.0062"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "162.0062"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.262.htm",
          "file": "FA.262.htm",
          "sha256": "dffe94ee8752b2e5fe09b70d7578ee64ab1d8eacef74913ff7ed895ae3fc234e",
          "sections": [
            "262.308"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "262.308"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Prospective adoptive parents’ access to child-history records with identity protection"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2809",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02809F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "57c736ba0d0a8f67a0877254ae9b173d80fb67fa8005e0b7f233afd1667dd5cb",
      "decision_source_sha256": "57c736ba0d0a8f67a0877254ae9b173d80fb67fa8005e0b7f233afd1667dd5cb",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Notice and aggregate reporting of suicide attempts in DFPS conservatorship",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Notice and aggregate reporting of suicide attempts in DFPS conservatorship",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(4) \"Significant change in medical condition\" means the occurrence of an injury or the onset of an illness that is life-threatening or may have serious long-term health consequences. The term includes : (A) the occurrence or onset of an injury or illness that requires hospitalization for surgery or another procedure that is not minor emergency care ; and (B) a suicide attempt .",
          "reason": "Adds aggregate counts of children attempting suicide while in DFPS managing conservatorship; existing report categories are retained. The deadline change is separately neutral. Adds suicide attempt to significant medical-condition change, engaging retained notice requirements. 264.018(d) requires reasonable effort within 24 hours to parents/attorneys; broader significant-event notice is within 48 hours of awareness. Retained (h)-(j) exceptions include unlocated/restricted/inactive parents, termination, documented best-interest limits, and absent contact information; attorney notice preserved in specified cases. Does not guarantee every parent receives notice. September 1 effective date. Moves the annual reporting deadline from February 1 to December 1; administrative timing is neutral, not an independently satisfied parental-rights criterion."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Adds aggregate counts of children attempting suicide while in DFPS managing conservatorship; existing report categories are retained. The deadline change is separately neutral.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds suicide attempt to significant medical-condition change, engaging retained notice requirements. 264.018(d) requires reasonable effort within 24 hours to parents/attorneys; broader significant-event notice is within 48 hours of awareness. Retained (h)-(j) exceptions include unlocated/restricted/inactive parents, termination, documented best-interest limits, and absent contact information; attorney notice preserved in specified cases. Does not guarantee every parent receives notice.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 264.017(b), reporting deadline",
            "assessment": "Moves the annual reporting deadline from February 1 to December 1; administrative timing is neutral, not an independently satisfied parental-rights criterion.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.264.htm",
          "file": "FA.264.htm",
          "sha256": "e0f7b5defcafcb933f24f1b5f40e22bb78373490e2bfd273350c498a63bf770f",
          "sections": [
            "264.018"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "264.018"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Notice and aggregate reporting of suicide attempts in DFPS conservatorship"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2052",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02052F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "0cd55e727bcfbe8c0f750a6474bcc3ea51002da3bd8db0e29269ea722ad9f44f",
      "decision_source_sha256": "0cd55e727bcfbe8c0f750a6474bcc3ea51002da3bd8db0e29269ea722ad9f44f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent presumption and evidentiary protections against nonparent custody claims",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Parent presumption and evidentiary protections against nonparent custody claims",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 153.002. BEST INTEREST OF CHILD ; REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION IN SUIT BETWEEN PARENT AND NONPARENT . (a) The best interest of the child shall always be the primary consideration of the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and possession of and access to the child. (b) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, it is a rebuttable presumption that: (1) a parent acts in the best interest of the parent's child; and (2) it is in the best interest of a child to be in the care, custody, and control of a parent. (c) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, the nonparent may overcome the presumption under Subsection (b) by proving by clear and convincing evidence that denial of the relief requested by the nonparent would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development. If the court renders an order in the suit granting relief to the nonparent, the court shall state in the order: (1) the specific facts that support the court's finding that denying the relief requested by the nonparent would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development; and (2) the extent to which the nonparent has overcome the presumption under Subsection (b).",
          "reason": "Requires fact-supported nonparent affidavit of significant impairment and dismissal/striking without adequate facts. Adds rebuttable presumptions that a parent acts in the child’s best interest and that parental care, custody and control is in the child’s best interest. A nonparent may rebut by clear and convincing evidence that denial of the requested relief would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional development. An order granting nonparent relief must state supporting specific facts and the extent of rebuttal. The best interest of the child remains primary; this is not an absolute parental veto. Carries applicable burden into modification and bars using a parent-agreed prior order alone to overcome presumption. Applies to pending and new suits. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Requires fact-supported nonparent affidavit of significant impairment and dismissal/striking without adequate facts.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds rebuttable presumptions that a parent acts in the child’s best interest and that parental care, custody and control is in the child’s best interest. A nonparent may rebut by clear and convincing evidence that denial of the requested relief would significantly impair the child’s physical health or emotional development. An order granting nonparent relief must state supporting specific facts and the extent of rebuttal. The best interest of the child remains primary; this is not an absolute parental veto.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Carries applicable burden into modification and bars using a parent-agreed prior order alone to overcome presumption.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Applies to pending and new suits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Parent presumption and evidentiary protections against nonparent custody claims"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2501",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02501E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "1be400f4c391b28145f79aa02fbb9d4c200f5dadebc313d074bfc42db084979e",
      "decision_source_sha256": "1be400f4c391b28145f79aa02fbb9d4c200f5dadebc313d074bfc42db084979e",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Indigent parents’ choice of qualified counsel in covered government child-protection suits",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Indigent parents’ choice of qualified counsel in covered government child-protection suits",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 107.01301. SELECTION OF ATTORNEY AD LITEM BY INDIGENT PARENT. (a) A parent who the court has determined is indigent for the purposes of Section 107.013 may select an attorney to represent the parent in a suit described by Section 107.013(a). (b) An attorney selected by a parent under Subsection (a) must: (1) be licensed to practice law in this state; (2) be in good standing with the State Bar of Texas; and (3) meet the applicable continuing education requirements of Section 107.0131. (c) The selection of an attorney by a parent under Subsection (a) is independent of any appointment system implemented by the court, including the rotation system described by Section 37.004, Government Code. The court may not take any action that influences, directs, or interferes with the selection of an attorney by a parent under Subsection (a). (d) An attorney selected by a parent under Subsection (a) shall serve as the parent's counsel of record upon filing with the court a notice of appearance and, if the parent is represented by other counsel, a motion to substitute counsel with the court. The filing of the notice and, if applicable, the motion is a ministerial act and does not require the approval of the court. The court's review of a notice and motion filed under this subsection shall be limited to confirming the attorney meets the requirements of Subsection (b). Upon confirming an attorney selected by a parent under Subsection (a) meets the requirements of Subsection (b), the court shall: (1) grant attorney's motion to substitute counsel, if applicable; and (2) terminate the appointment of any previously appointed attorney ad litem for the parent. (e) A court may not: (1) deny or delay approval of a motion under Subsection (d) except to confirm that the attorney meets the requirements of Subsection (b); or (2) impose any additional requirements on the attorney other than those described by Subsection (b). (f) An attorney serving as attorney ad litem for a parent under this section: (1) has the powers and duties described by Section 107.0131 or 107.0132, as applicable; and (2) is subject to disciplinary action as provided by Section 107.0133. (g) Payment for services rendered by an attorney serving as attorney ad litem for a parent under this section shall be: (1) equal to the payments made to an attorney appointed under Section 107.013 to serve as attorney ad litem for an indigent parent; (2) made in accordance with existing payment procedures applicable to an attorney appointed under Section 107.013 to serve as attorney ad litem for an indigent parent; and (3) paid from the general funds of the county. (h) A court may not adopt or enforce local rules that conflict with this section, impose additional requirements on the selection of an attorney under this section, or otherwise interfere with the right of a parent to select an attorney under Subsection (a). Interference with the selection of an attorney by a parent under Subsection (a) for financial gain or favoritism is a violation of judicial ethics and may subject a judge to discipline under the Code of Judicial Conduct or prosecution under the penal laws of this state, including Section 36.02 or 36.08, Penal Code, as applicable. (i) This section does not limit the authority of a court to remove an attorney for good cause under applicable law. (j) The Office of Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System may adopt rules necessary to implement this section.",
          "reason": "Makes appointment subject to parent selection and requires notice of choice. Creates qualified licensed/good-standing counsel selection with child-protection education, ministerial substitution and county payment at appointed-counsel rates. Preserves attorney duties, discipline and good-cause removal. Bars interfering local rules and improper financial-gain/favoritism interference; existing Penal Code offenses apply only when their elements are met. Does not promise unlimited compensation or immunity from removal. Prospective application to new suits. OCA rules by January 1, 2026. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Makes appointment subject to parent selection and requires notice of choice.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Creates qualified licensed/good-standing counsel selection with child-protection education, ministerial substitution and county payment at appointed-counsel rates. Preserves attorney duties, discipline and good-cause removal. Bars interfering local rules and improper financial-gain/favoritism interference; existing Penal Code offenses apply only when their elements are met. Does not promise unlimited compensation or immunity from removal.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Prospective application to new suits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "OCA rules by January 1, 2026.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.107.htm",
          "file": "FA.107.htm",
          "sha256": "13e3149a347594c756aca7bae4636e39ce668fc71c2fb8e822b6efa02496497b",
          "sections": [
            "107.0131",
            "107.0132",
            "107.0133"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "107.0131, 107.0132, 107.0133"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Indigent parents’ choice of qualified counsel in covered government child-protection suits"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 670",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00670E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "deaa1968360a34ace285e9716acecd1ad0bd3db0da4d23e8bce5017266b999f7",
      "decision_source_sha256": "deaa1968360a34ace285e9716acecd1ad0bd3db0da4d23e8bce5017266b999f7",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent-consented access to specified investigational sunscreen for eligible minors",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Parent-consented access to specified investigational sunscreen for eligible minors",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative Health and Safety Code 491.052",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 491.052. INFORMED CONSENT. (a) Before recommending or prescribing an investigational sun protection product, a physician must require an eligible patient to sign a written informed consent form. (b) If the patient is a minor or lacks the mental capacity to provide informed consent, a parent or legal guardian may provide informed consent on the patient's behalf. (c) The Texas Medical Board by rule may adopt a form for the informed consent required under this section.",
          "reason": "Legislative findings state informed individual choice; classified neutral. Findings establish no medical safety, efficacy or superiority evidence. Creates limited access after physician considers approved products less effective, written recommendation and informed consent; parent/legal guardian may consent for minor/incapacitated patient. Manufacturer need not supply and may charge costs. Does not create a cause of action (not blanket immunity), protects standard-of-care recommendations from solely access-based licensing action, bars state interference and preserves clinical-trial insurance coverage. Adult access is neutral to the scored parent-choice requirement. Federal approval is not granted. Effective-date provision."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Legislative findings state informed individual choice; classified neutral. Findings establish no medical safety, efficacy or superiority evidence.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Creates limited access after physician considers approved products less effective, written recommendation and informed consent; parent/legal guardian may consent for minor/incapacitated patient. Manufacturer need not supply and may charge costs. Does not create a cause of action (not blanket immunity), protects standard-of-care recommendations from solely access-based licensing action, bars state interference and preserves clinical-trial insurance coverage. Adult access is neutral to the scored parent-choice requirement. Federal approval is not granted.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Effective-date provision.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Parent-consented access to specified investigational sunscreen for eligible minors"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1049",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01049E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "8be94acacf03295f62e3af8e0fd5b3b46b36eda22c81f089571eac69cab99068",
      "decision_source_sha256": "8be94acacf03295f62e3af8e0fd5b3b46b36eda22c81f089571eac69cab99068",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent-requested religious release time from public school",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Parent-requested religious release time from public school",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 25.0875. EXCUSED ABSENCE TO ATTEND RELEASED TIME COURSE. (a) In this section, \"released time course\" means a course in religious instruction offered by a private entity. (b) A school district or open-enrollment charter school shall, on the request of a parent or legal guardian of a student enrolled at the district or school and subject to the policy adopted under Subsection (c), excuse the student from attending school to attend a released time course for at least one but not more than five hours a week. (c) Each school district and open-enrollment charter school shall adopt a policy for excusing a student enrolled at the district or school from attending school to attend a released time course. The policy: (1) must require: (A) the student's parent or legal guardian to provide written consent for the student to attend the released time course; (B) the private entity offering the released time course to maintain attendance records and make the records available to the district or school at which the student is enrolled; (C) the private entity, parent or legal guardian, or student to assume responsibility for transportation, including transportation for a student with a disability, to and from any location at which the released time course is offered; (D) the private entity to make provisions for and assume liability for the student enrolled in the released time course while the student is under the private entity's care; and (E) the student to assume responsibility for any schoolwork issued during the student's absence; (2) must prohibit: (A) the district or school from using district or school funds, excluding de minimis costs, to facilitate the provision of a released time course; and (B) the private entity from offering the released time course on district or school property, unless permitted under a neutral policy of equal access that allows community organizations to use district or school property; and (3) may not interfere with the ability of the student's parent or legal guardian to request or access a released time course for the student.",
          "reason": "Adds release-time religious instruction as an excused absence; existing other absence categories retained. Requires 1–5 hours weekly on parent request and consent; private attendance records, private/parent/student transport including disability, provider liability and makeup-work duties. No school funding except de minimis; school-premises restriction subject to neutral equal access. Policies may not interfere with parent-requested participation. No finding that other instructional programs are harmful. Policies by January 1, 2026. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Adds release-time religious instruction as an excused absence; existing other absence categories retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Requires 1–5 hours weekly on parent request and consent; private attendance records, private/parent/student transport including disability, provider liability and makeup-work duties. No school funding except de minimis; school-premises restriction subject to neutral equal access. Policies may not interfere with parent-requested participation. No finding that other instructional programs are harmful.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Policies by January 1, 2026.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Parent-requested religious release time from public school"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1838",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01838E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "412c4721b29009bd92e703a6ed5793b10f067b723215a0600e90963da52805f4",
      "decision_source_sha256": "412c4721b29009bd92e703a6ed5793b10f067b723215a0600e90963da52805f4",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent representation and compensation procedures in government custody/termination cases",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Parent representation and compensation procedures in government custody/termination cases",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(a) In a suit filed by a governmental entity in which termination of the parent-child relationship or the appointment of a conservator for a child is requested, the court shall appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the interests of: (1) an indigent parent of the child who responds in opposition to the termination or appointment; (2) a parent served by citation by publication; (3) an alleged father who failed to register with the registry under Chapter 160 and whose identity or location is unknown; and (4) an alleged father who registered with the paternity registry under Chapter 160, but the petitioner's attempt to personally serve citation at the address provided to the registry and at any other address for the alleged father known by the petitioner has been unsuccessful.",
          "reason": "Removes Subtitle E limitation from government-filed suits requiring covered parent counsel; does not establish paid counsel in all private suits. Clarifies payment, removes fraudulent vouchers, creates regional-judge appeal of denied/modified/unapproved claims and payment deadline. Requires joint court fee schedules considering reasonable services, overhead and qualified attorney availability, with itemized vouchers and expenses. Actual future lawyer availability is not presumed. Schedules and prospective appointments begin January 1, 2026. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Removes Subtitle E limitation from government-filed suits requiring covered parent counsel; does not establish paid counsel in all private suits.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Clarifies payment, removes fraudulent vouchers, creates regional-judge appeal of denied/modified/unapproved claims and payment deadline.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Requires joint court fee schedules considering reasonable services, overhead and qualified attorney availability, with itemized vouchers and expenses. Actual future lawyer availability is not presumed.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Schedules and prospective appointments begin January 1, 2026.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Parent representation and compensation procedures in government custody/termination cases"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4730",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04730E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "e8bdbde2bf81d1b377834ada34e1ed45934a96cf4a1d7573afbba49faacec4b6",
      "decision_source_sha256": "e8bdbde2bf81d1b377834ada34e1ed45934a96cf4a1d7573afbba49faacec4b6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Informed parental relinquishment and adoption rights with agency accountability",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Informed parental relinquishment and adoption rights with agency accountability",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(a) An affidavit for voluntary relinquishment of parental rights must be: (1) on the form adopted by the Health and Human Services Commission in conjunction with the Department of Family and Protective Services under Subsection (b-1); (2) signed by the parent, whether or not a minor, whose parental rights are to be relinquished on or after the seventh day after the date of the birth of the child; (3) witnessed by two credible persons; and (4) verified before a person authorized to take oaths. (b-1) The Health and Human Services Commission, in conjunction with the Department of Family and Protective Services, shall adopt and make available on each agency's publicly accessible Internet website a form to be used for an affidavit for voluntary relinquishment of parental rights. The form must include an explanation of: (1) the circumstances under which an affidavit for voluntary relinquishment of parental rights may be revoked and procedures for revocation; and (2) the parent's right to: (A) seek child support if the parent chooses to not relinquish the parent's rights; (B) consider alternatives to adoption, including kinship care or temporary assistance; (C) apply for and potentially receive government benefits; (D) consult with an attorney before signing the affidavit; (E) seek counseling regarding adoption and relinquishment of parental rights; (F) receive information regarding post-adoption contact agreements; (G) request non-identifying information regarding prospective adoptive parents, including general demographic information and information regarding lifestyle and values; (H) receive a copy of each signed document related to the relinquishment of parental rights, including the affidavit and any adoption agreement; (I) receive any medical record or genetic screening information related to the child before relinquishment; and (J) register with a mutual consent voluntary adoption registry established under Subchapter E, Chapter 162, including the central registry established and maintained by the vital statistics unit. (e) The relinquishment in an affidavit that designates the Department of Family and Protective Services or a licensed child-placing agency to serve as the managing conservator is irrevocable. A relinquishment in any other affidavit of relinquishment is revocable for 60 days after the date of its execution.",
          "reason": "Changes signing floor from 48 hours to seventh day; standardized form explains revocation, child support, alternatives, benefits, counsel, counseling, records and registry. Non-DFPS/nonlicensed-agency relinquishment revocable for 60 days; retained DFPS/licensed-agency designation remains irrevocable. No universal revocation right. Requires adoptive-rights notice addressing history records, legal risks, documents, nonidentifying family information, support and itemized costs; record access remains subject to 162.0062 protections. Adds agency training, annual compliance, random licensing/training audits, complaint procedure and appropriate staffing/administration rules. Renames existing child-care training heading. Adds child-placing agency training on adoptive rights and relinquishment. Forms and specified application begin March 1, 2026. Rules due January 1, 2026. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Changes signing floor from 48 hours to seventh day; standardized form explains revocation, child support, alternatives, benefits, counsel, counseling, records and registry. Non-DFPS/nonlicensed-agency relinquishment revocable for 60 days; retained DFPS/licensed-agency designation remains irrevocable. No universal revocation right.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Requires adoptive-rights notice addressing history records, legal risks, documents, nonidentifying family information, support and itemized costs; record access remains subject to 162.0062 protections.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Adds agency training, annual compliance, random licensing/training audits, complaint procedure and appropriate staffing/administration rules.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Renames existing child-care training heading.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Adds child-placing agency training on adoptive rights and relinquishment.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Forms and specified application begin March 1, 2026.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7",
            "assessment": "Rules due January 1, 2026.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 8",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.162.htm",
          "file": "FA.162.htm",
          "sha256": "43bc9976b45c8cddb61b30704c4a1377a2823153132f44a32b8875775d3492e6",
          "sections": [
            "162.0062"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "162.0062"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Informed parental relinquishment and adoption rights with agency accountability"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1813",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01813E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "755a89c6331c52f19d5391a8458a715d8174afbe17fbc56464d46b55398eea37",
      "decision_source_sha256": "755a89c6331c52f19d5391a8458a715d8174afbe17fbc56464d46b55398eea37",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Special-education representation information and qualified nonattorney assistance",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Special-education representation information and qualified nonattorney assistance",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 3, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 29.0165. SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW TRAINING COURSE. (a) The agency shall collaborate with regional education service centers to develop and offer a training course on special education law for persons serving as non-attorney representatives for students. The course: (1) must include information on: (A) state and federal laws, rules, and regulations related to special education; (B) state and federal rules and procedures that apply to due process hearings, including 34 C.F.R. Sections 300.507 through 300.515 and 300.532; (C) the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C. Section 1232g); and (D) accepted standards for ethics; and (2) may include a final exam, as approved by the agency. (b) In developing the training course under Subsection (a), the agency shall: (1) consult with relevant stakeholders, including representatives of school districts and parents of students who have participated in a special education due process hearing under Section 29.0162; and (2) make a good faith effort to accurately represent the interests of school districts and parents of students who are the subject of a special education due process hearing. (c) As soon as practicable after the conclusion of each legislative session, the agency shall collaborate with regional education service centers to develop and offer a biennial update training course to persons who have completed the training under Subsection (a). (d) The agency may charge a fee for a person to participate in a training course developed under Subsection (a) or (c). (e) The agency shall offer to individuals who have demonstrated a financial need options to take the training courses described by Subsections (a) and (c) for free or at a discounted price. (f) A person may accept payment from a student's parent to serve as a non-attorney representative for a student in an impartial due process hearing brought under 20 U.S.C. Section 1415 only if the person has: (1) completed the training described by Subsection (a) or another training course developed or adopted by the agency; (2) if applicable, completed the most recent biennial update training described by Subsection (c) or another update training course developed or adopted by the agency not later than one year after the update training is offered; (3) not engaged in a false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice actionable under Subchapter E, Chapter 17, Business & Commerce Code; and (4) presented proof of the person's eligibility to serve as a non-attorney representative under this subsection to the student's parent. (g) For purposes of Subsection (f)(1), the agency may adopt an existing statewide or nationwide special education law training course. (h) The agency may use any federal funds received under Part B, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. Section 1411 et seq.), to administer this section. (i) The agency shall post on the agency's Internet website a list of training courses developed or adopted for purposes of Subsection (f). (j) Each school district shall post on the school district's Internet website the list of training courses described by Subsection (i).",
          "reason": "Adds parent notices of representation rights and consumer-complaint routes to IEP information and federal safeguards notice. Replaces prior district-employment/objection exclusion with deceptive-practice disqualification; requires compensated representatives to agree to ethics/professional conduct and a written dispute-resolution agreement. Section 29.0162(b)(5) exempts parent/familial representatives from that particular training mandate only; it does not waive the separate paid-representative conditions in 29.0165(f). Creates training/update courses, stakeholder consultation, optional exam, fees with need-based free/discounted access and course publication. Under 29.0165(f), accepting payment from a student’s parent requires initial training, applicable updates within one year, absence of deceptive practices and eligibility proof to the parent. This subsection contains no familial exception. These qualification protections and limits are assessed together, not separately inflated criteria. Rules/course implementation and training-rule deadline within one year after course development. Conditional immediate effect or September 1."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Adds parent notices of representation rights and consumer-complaint routes to IEP information and federal safeguards notice.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Replaces prior district-employment/objection exclusion with deceptive-practice disqualification; requires compensated representatives to agree to ethics/professional conduct and a written dispute-resolution agreement. Section 29.0162(b)(5) exempts parent/familial representatives from that particular training mandate only; it does not waive the separate paid-representative conditions in 29.0165(f).",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Creates training/update courses, stakeholder consultation, optional exam, fees with need-based free/discounted access and course publication. Under 29.0165(f), accepting payment from a student’s parent requires initial training, applicable updates within one year, absence of deceptive practices and eligibility proof to the parent. This subsection contains no familial exception. These qualification protections and limits are assessed together, not separately inflated criteria.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Rules/course implementation and training-rule deadline within one year after course development.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Special-education representation information and qualified nonattorney assistance"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 116",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00116F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "8856d7cf5f930658b48795df2f4922c9d02d6f7a9abb8587a3daa811467aee79",
      "decision_source_sha256": "8856d7cf5f930658b48795df2f4922c9d02d6f7a9abb8587a3daa811467aee79",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Removal of service-plan noncompliance as an independent parental-termination ground",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Removal of service-plan noncompliance as an independent parental-termination ground",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, deleted former Family Code 161.001(b)(1)(O)",
          "excerpt": "(O) failed to comply with the provisions of a court order that specifically established the actions necessary for the parent to obtain the return of the child who has been in the permanent or temporary managing conservatorship of the Department of Family and Protective Services for not less than nine months as a result of the child's removal from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the child;",
          "reason": "The quoted former paragraph (O) is deleted, not enacted. Conforming renumbering of child-support cross-references; does not newly impose listed support grounds. Deletes former 161.001(b)(1)(O) ground for failure to comply with specified reunification orders after nine months. Retains clear-and-convincing standard, child-best-interest finding and other grounds including endangerment, abandonment, specified crime and dangerous substance use. Relettering does not newly enact retained grounds. This preserves families from termination on the deleted ground without barring termination on independently proven grounds. Applies pending/new suits. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Conforming renumbering of child-support cross-references; does not newly impose listed support grounds.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Deletes former 161.001(b)(1)(O) ground for failure to comply with specified reunification orders after nine months. Retains clear-and-convincing standard, child-best-interest finding and other grounds including endangerment, abandonment, specified crime and dangerous substance use. Relettering does not newly enact retained grounds. This preserves families from termination on the deleted ground without barring termination on independently proven grounds.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Applies pending/new suits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "evidence_note": "Excerpt reproduces the complete deleted reunification-order ground. Remaining grounds and renumbered paragraph (O) are not deleted.",
      "scored_requirement": "Removal of service-plan noncompliance as an independent parental-termination ground"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2495",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02495E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "a09d9f02fed4a7a835b721d9ac9beade951c757a384ae6058211a8910a551199",
      "decision_source_sha256": "a09d9f02fed4a7a835b721d9ac9beade951c757a384ae6058211a8910a551199",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "School designation and enrollment authority for appointed sole managing conservators",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "School designation and enrollment authority for appointed sole managing conservators",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 153.132. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF PARENT APPOINTED SOLE MANAGING CONSERVATOR. Unless limited by court order, a parent appointed as sole managing conservator of a child has the rights and duties provided by Subchapter B and the following exclusive rights: (1) the right to designate the primary residence of the child; (2) the right to consent to medical, dental, and surgical treatment involving invasive procedures; (3) the right to consent to psychiatric and psychological treatment; (4) the right to receive and give receipt for periodic payments for the support of the child and to hold or disburse these funds for the benefit of the child; (5) the right to represent the child in legal action and to make other decisions of substantial legal significance concerning the child; (6) the right to consent to marriage and to enlistment in the armed forces of the United States; (7) the right to make decisions concerning the child's education; (8) the right to designate the school the child will attend and to enroll the child in the school, subject to any eligibility or admissions requirements; (9) the right to the services and earnings of the child; (10) except when a guardian of the child's estate or a guardian or attorney ad litem has been appointed for the child, the right to act as an agent of the child in relation to the child's estate if the child's action is required by a state, the United States, or a foreign government; and (11) the right to: (A) apply for a passport for the child; (B) renew the child's passport; and (C) maintain possession of the child's passport.",
          "reason": "Expressly adds school selection/enrollment to parent sole conservator rights subject to admissions and court limits; other rights retained. Makes parallel clarification for appointed nonparent/agency/DFPS conservators subject to court/chapter limits. Does not appoint a nonparent or change threshold for removing parent custody. This implementation of an already-appointed caregiver’s educational responsibility is neutral to changing custody presumptions, not evidence that every nonparent appointment supersedes a fit parent. Applies pending/new suits. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Expressly adds school selection/enrollment to parent sole conservator rights subject to admissions and court limits; other rights retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Makes parallel clarification for appointed nonparent/agency/DFPS conservators subject to court/chapter limits. Does not appoint a nonparent or change threshold for removing parent custody. This implementation of an already-appointed caregiver’s educational responsibility is neutral to changing custody presumptions, not evidence that every nonparent appointment supersedes a fit parent.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Applies pending/new suits.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "School designation and enrollment authority for appointed sole managing conservators"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 112",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00112E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "7c88533d3684e53f6ee94958e4ed6b90c7a262a6d8c70370f12179f1e60d9a2d",
      "decision_source_sha256": "7c88533d3684e53f6ee94958e4ed6b90c7a262a6d8c70370f12179f1e60d9a2d",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent access to electronic school records and consent for questionnaires/screening",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Parent access to electronic school records and consent for questionnaires/screening",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 2, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(a) Subject to Subsection (a-1), an employee of a school district must obtain the written consent of a child's parent before the employee may: (1) conduct a psychological examination, test, or treatment ; (2) administer a student well-being questionnaire, health care screening form, or survey ; or (3) make or authorize the making of a videotape of a child or record or authorize the recording of a child's voice. (a-1) A parent's written consent is not required under Subsection (a) if an examination, test, or treatment is required under Section 38.004 or state or federal law regarding requirements for special education.",
          "reason": "Expressly covers written/electronic records; listed categories retained. Adds consent for student well-being questionnaires, healthcare screening forms and surveys; retains psychological treatment and recording provisions and moves 38.004/special-education legal exceptions into (a-1). Retained (b) recording exceptions cover safety/order, extracurricular/co-curricular, classroom, media and 29.022 safety uses. No blanket finding that all surveys are harmful; no claim retained exceptions are new adverse amendments. Conditional immediate effect or September 1."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Expressly covers written/electronic records; listed categories retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Adds consent for student well-being questionnaires, healthcare screening forms and surveys; retains psychological treatment and recording provisions and moves 38.004/special-education legal exceptions into (a-1). Retained (b) recording exceptions cover safety/order, extracurricular/co-curricular, classroom, media and 29.022 safety uses. No blanket finding that all surveys are harmful; no claim retained exceptions are new adverse amendments.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.26.htm",
          "file": "ED.26.htm",
          "sha256": "857b1f8df36dfb9c2803d424dfd682fd48602dabf45e028904a01130579dd0b3",
          "sections": [
            "26.009"
          ],
          "note": "Current compilation used only for retained context, not proof of bill passage or original amendment.",
          "locator": "26.009"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Parent access to electronic school records and consent for questionnaires/screening"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4116",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04116E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "9a3a99b7f7d8eb5adf9948bbd7f87cf55f1e41dd8fa89ade1edac2e79b6c04e0",
      "decision_source_sha256": "9a3a99b7f7d8eb5adf9948bbd7f87cf55f1e41dd8fa89ade1edac2e79b6c04e0",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Written benefit information for relatives and designated caregivers",
      "scope_explanation": "All numbered sections assessed. One scoped parental/family-rights criterion, weight 1, satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is a directional TPI anchor within the stated scope, not whole-priority completion or an official RPT grade. Retained conditions and neutral implementation do not produce additional points.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Written benefit information for relatives and designated caregivers",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, complete operative text as amended/added",
          "excerpt": "(c) Once a child is placed with a relative or other designated caregiver, the department shall inform the caregiver in writing of: (1) the option to become verified by a licensed child-placing agency to operate an agency foster home, if applicable , and the process for becoming an agency foster home ; (2) the difference between an unverified relative or other designated caregiver and an agency foster home, including the amount of additional financial assistance the relative or other designated caregiver would receive after becoming an agency foster home; (3) the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program including: (A) the qualifications for the program; (B) the process for applying for benefits under the program; and (C) the amount of financial benefits under the program; (4) the availability of any financial assistance available under this subchapter; (5) the permanency care assistance program under Subchapter K ; and (6) any other financial benefit available to a relative or other designated caregiver .",
          "reason": "Expands required written notice to explain agency-foster verification/process, relative assistance difference, TANF qualifications/application/amounts and all available financial benefits. Existing permanency-care notice retained. Does not change benefit eligibility or guarantee approval; directly supports informed kinship care. September 1 effective date."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped assessment, provisional pending independent audit. Passage status remains separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Expands required written notice to explain agency-foster verification/process, relative assistance difference, TANF qualifications/application/amounts and all available financial benefits. Existing permanency-care notice retained. Does not change benefit eligibility or guarantee approval; directly supports informed kinship care.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "unscored",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously published qualitative match had no completed numerical assessment; missing full provision inventory, applicable criteria and exceptions. Provisional numerical assessment remains subject to independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "evidence_note": "Complete operative notice subsection; deleted text and deletion brackets omitted.",
      "scored_requirement": "Written benefit information for relatives and designated caregivers"
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 1633",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01633F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "f6669c6a6055ab72b1eb8daae5a1da49df3a58ad545a11d9244bc01d44ac471a",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "f6669c6a6055ab72b1eb8daae5a1da49df3a58ad545a11d9244bc01d44ac471a",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Registered permit-exempt wells in groundwater permit review",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version are inventoried below. One scoped TPI criterion: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the whole priority or a prediction of results.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-scoped",
          "requirement": "Protect affected groundwater users and resources through district permit review; the TPI scope includes groundwater.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section 1, 36.113(d)(2)(C); Section 1, 36.113(d)(1)–(7)",
          "excerpt": "wells that are registered with the district and exempt from the requirement to obtain a permit",
          "reason": "The new36.113(d)(2)(C) requires the district to consider unreasonable effects on registered permit-exempt wells when deciding covered permits/amendments. This protects those groundwater users within the bill’s scope; it requires consideration, not automatic denial. Other36.113(d) safeguards are retained neutral context and contribute no separate credit. Renewals under36.1145 are expressly excluded."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 36.113(d) introductory limitation",
            "assessment": "Applies to granting/denying permits and covered amendments; expressly excludes operating-permit renewals under 36.1145. Does not create universal district jurisdiction or eliminate permit exemptions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 36.113(d)(2)(C)",
            "assessment": "New required consideration of unreasonable effects on registered permit-exempt wells supplements existing resource and permit-holder consideration; requires consideration, not automatic denial.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 36.113(d)(1)–(7)",
            "assessment": "Retained conformity, fees, groundwater/surface-resource effects, beneficial use, management plan, Hill Country ornamental-water inquiry, conservation/waste avoidance, groundwater-quality diligence and well-plugging agreements are neutral statutory context. No new-achievement credit is awarded for these retained provisions; the sole newly aligned command is consideration of registered permit-exempt wells in (d)(2)(C).",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1, 2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-scoped"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Protect affected groundwater users and resources through district permit review; the TPI scope includes groundwater.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Prior source-assessment queue was unscored: complete provision inventory and applicable criteria had not yet been established. This preserves an unscored state, not a previous numerical grade.",
          "status": "UNSCORED_SOURCE_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED",
          "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB01633F.htm",
          "decision_source_sha256": "f6669c6a6055ab72b1eb8daae5a1da49df3a58ad545a11d9244bc01d44ac471a"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "892",
      "bill": "SB 14",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/892/billtext/html/SB00014F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "5b316d9d6cb38f60505dd7da90d45ca7779704b0b5581dca0a522bdc8f0b0bdc",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "5b316d9d6cb38f60505dd7da90d45ca7779704b0b5581dca0a522bdc8f0b0bdc",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Conservation and reuse impact-fee credits with applicable water-quality controls",
      "scope_explanation": "One combined scoped TPI water criterion: financial facilitation of eligible conservation/reuse projects plus actual operative conservation and applicable water-quality safeguards. All two bill sections and relevant statutory context reviewed. Proposed 1/1 ×100=100; independent substantive audit pending. This does not assert every credited product requires a water permit or that realized environmental outcomes have been measured.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-credit-protection",
          "requirement": "Facilitate eligible conservation/reuse infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected surface water and groundwater.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1, Local Government Code395.0231(a)–(c); Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19),26.027(a)–(d),26.121(a)–(e)",
          "excerpt": "results in water reuse, conservation, or savings",
          "reason": "The mandatory fee credit in(a) requires an actual conservation/reuse/savings result; it is not awarded merely because a developer financed infrastructure. Eligibility includes consumption/supply/infrastructure reductions, less wastewater or stormwater demand, and above-standard efficiency. For wastewater/pollutant pathways, retained Water Code26.121 prohibits unauthorized sewage/industrial/municipal and point-source pollutant discharges and violating permit conditions;26.001(5) expressly includes groundwater, springs, rivers, wetlands, beds and banks.26.027 requires discharge permits/conditions and generally prior authorization for treatment-facility construction, subject to disclosed exceptions. A fixture-only consumption reduction need not require a discharge permit; its protective condition is the mandatory saving in395.0231(a). Retained safeguards are contextual conditions, not newly enacted achievements or additional score points."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(a)",
            "assessment": "Mandatory credit against otherwise assessed water/wastewater impact fees for constructed, contributed or dedicated eligible facilities/systems/products that result in water reuse, conservation or savings.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(b)(1)–(4)",
            "assessment": "Eligibility categories cover reduced per-service-unit consumption/supply/treatment/distribution needs, reduced wastewater facility demand, reduced stormwater/drainage demand or above-standard efficiency/reuse/conservation. The opening(a) result condition applies to every category; not every category independently exceeds standard compliance.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(c)",
            "assessment": "Political subdivisions must adopt fair, consistent calculation and review/approval procedures. No credit amount or automatic environmental permit is specified.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2",
            "assessment": "January1,2026 effective date. Passage and actual credit implementation remain separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19);26.121",
            "assessment": "State water includes surface water and groundwater; pollution includes harmful alteration. Authorized discharge conditions apply to credited wastewater works just as other works.26.121(a)(2) recognizes certified water-quality management/abatement plans, and(a)(3) excludes activities under specified other agencies from that paragraph; those limitations are not blanket repeal of the separate sewage/point-source prohibitions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code26.027(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Commission may permit discharges subject to law and protective conditions; generally treatment construction requires permit, except commission approval. Chapter26 does not require a dredge/fill permit, while preserving water-quality control authority. Not every construction impact or water allocation is resolved by this provision.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate eligible conservation/reuse infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected surface water and groundwater.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "26.001(5),(14),(19);26.027;26.121",
          "role": "Retained operative pollution/discharge protections; not claimed as new SB14 requirements. Disclosed jurisdiction and permit exceptions apply."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Confirm the result-based conservation condition plus specified applicable discharge protections satisfies the approved scoped combined water criterion. This is not a financing-only/no-waiver inference. No conclusion about actual environmental outcomes or universal permitting.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source and applicability assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "891",
      "bill": "SB 13",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/891/billtext/html/SB00013E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "93a6fe3e4981665f3e37deb481b1ee1d042c65fefef771a0e91e0f04b670b1b6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "93a6fe3e4981665f3e37deb481b1ee1d042c65fefef771a0e91e0f04b670b1b6",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Conservation and reuse impact-fee credits with applicable water-quality controls",
      "scope_explanation": "One combined scoped TPI water criterion: financial facilitation of eligible conservation/reuse projects plus actual operative conservation and applicable water-quality safeguards. All two bill sections and relevant statutory context reviewed. Proposed 1/1 ×100=100; independent substantive audit pending. This does not assert every credited product requires a water permit or that realized environmental outcomes have been measured.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-credit-protection",
          "requirement": "Facilitate eligible conservation/reuse infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected surface water and groundwater.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1, Local Government Code395.0231(a)–(c); Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19),26.027(a)–(d),26.121(a)–(e)",
          "excerpt": "results in water reuse, conservation, or savings",
          "reason": "The mandatory fee credit in(a) requires an actual conservation/reuse/savings result; it is not awarded merely because a developer financed infrastructure. Eligibility includes consumption/supply/infrastructure reductions, less wastewater or stormwater demand, and above-standard efficiency. For wastewater/pollutant pathways, retained Water Code26.121 prohibits unauthorized sewage/industrial/municipal and point-source pollutant discharges and violating permit conditions;26.001(5) expressly includes groundwater, springs, rivers, wetlands, beds and banks.26.027 requires discharge permits/conditions and generally prior authorization for treatment-facility construction, subject to disclosed exceptions. A fixture-only consumption reduction need not require a discharge permit; its protective condition is the mandatory saving in395.0231(a). Retained safeguards are contextual conditions, not newly enacted achievements or additional score points."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other requirements of this priority",
          "reason": "The full inventory does not change those separate requirements. Narrow scope earns no credit for unaddressed programs; neutral administration and applicability limitations are disclosed separately."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit. This is the first-called-session engrossed proposal, not the second-called-session enacted SB14. Their two operative sections compare identically; passage remains separate.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(a)",
            "assessment": "Mandatory credit against otherwise assessed water/wastewater impact fees for constructed, contributed or dedicated eligible facilities/systems/products that result in water reuse, conservation or savings.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(b)(1)–(4)",
            "assessment": "Eligibility categories cover reduced per-service-unit consumption/supply/treatment/distribution needs, reduced wastewater facility demand, reduced stormwater/drainage demand or above-standard efficiency/reuse/conservation. The opening(a) result condition applies to every category; not every category independently exceeds standard compliance.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,395.0231(c)",
            "assessment": "Political subdivisions must adopt fair, consistent calculation and review/approval procedures. No credit amount or automatic environmental permit is specified.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2",
            "assessment": "January1,2026 effective date. Passage and actual credit implementation remain separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19);26.121",
            "assessment": "State water includes surface water and groundwater; pollution includes harmful alteration. Authorized discharge conditions apply to credited wastewater works just as other works.26.121(a)(2) recognizes certified water-quality management/abatement plans, and(a)(3) excludes activities under specified other agencies from that paragraph; those limitations are not blanket repeal of the separate sewage/point-source prohibitions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code26.027(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Commission may permit discharges subject to law and protective conditions; generally treatment construction requires permit, except commission approval. Chapter26 does not require a dredge/fill permit, while preserving water-quality control authority. Not every construction impact or water allocation is resolved by this provision.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-credit-protection"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate eligible conservation/reuse infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected surface water and groundwater.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "26.001(5),(14),(19);26.027;26.121",
          "role": "Retained operative protections; 26.027 amendment history ends 2007 and 26.121 predates 2025. Current compilation is context, not a new SB13 provision. Applicability and stated exceptions require independent audit."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Confirm the result-based conservation condition plus specified applicable discharge protections satisfies the approved scoped combined water criterion. This is not a financing-only/no-waiver inference. No conclusion about actual environmental outcomes or universal permitting. Reassessment of prior null: added actual Water Code26.121/26.027 protective requirements and distinguished non-discharge fixture conservation from wastewater paths. Independent auditor must decide sufficiency; prior held record is preserved unchanged in water-history-review-20261102/candidates.json.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source and applicability assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4230",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04230E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "337cf72213a5e7e7607a802a097e51b1b857d51a86792f3d50ae450528746206",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "337cf72213a5e7e7607a802a097e51b1b857d51a86792f3d50ae450528746206",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Trail eminent-domain prohibition through September 1, 2037",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete three-section review identifies an express property-acquisition protection. The water-protection inference from optional conservation memoranda is not used. One scoped property criterion:1/1×100=100, pending independent audit. This is not a claim the bill meets the separate water-infrastructure requirement. The eminent-domain prohibition expires September1,2037; saved memoranda do not extend the statute.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "sovereignty-trail-property",
          "requirement": "Prohibit compulsory taking for this trail while Section31.5011 remains in force through its September1,2037 expiration.",
          "official_requirement": "Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1, Natural Resources Code31.5011(f)–(g); Section2",
          "excerpt": "may not be acquired through eminent domain",
          "reason": "Section31.5011(f) prohibits eminent-domain acquisition for the trail while that section is in force. Section31.5011(g) expires the entire section on September1,2037, including this prohibition. Section2 preserves memoranda, not the statutory prohibition. The bill grants no new taking authority after expiration; this assessment makes no claim about powers under other law. The temporary project-specific protection supports scoped alignment, not a permanent statewide ban."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Water infrastructure/protection; grid; foreign ownership; civil forfeiture; agriculture",
          "reason": "Optional conservation memoranda and proximity to springs do not establish the combined water criterion. The operative aligned provision is the explicit eminent-domain prohibition. Trail formation does not itself authorize water appropriation/discharge or change separate grid/agriculture/forfeiture rules."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.501",
            "assessment": "Defines trail exclusively for pedestrians/bicyclists.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.5011(a)–(e)",
            "assessment": "Land office coordinates a trail by2036 with memoranda, maintenance/acquisition coordination and rulemaking. Conservation efforts are permitted subjects of memoranda, not mandatory water-protection measures; no water-criterion credit awarded.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.5011(f)–(g)",
            "assessment": "Prohibits eminent-domain acquisition of required property/interests; coordination section expiresSeptember1,2037. The proposal does not authorize compulsory acquisition after expiration.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.502–.504",
            "assessment": "Connects Alamo/Capitol and named springs for recreation/stewardship/heritage; acquired state property restricted to trail purposes; Parks and Wildlife maintains property it acquires. These land-use and management commands do not newly authorize water extraction or discharge.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2",
            "assessment": "Existing memoranda remain valid when coordination section expires; no eminent-domain authority granted by this savings provision.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3",
            "assessment": "September1,2025 effective date in engrossed proposal; actual construction/enactment not assumed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "sovereignty-trail-property"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Prohibit compulsory taking for this trail while Section31.5011 remains in force through its September1,2037 expiration.",
      "audit_challenge": "Independently confirm property-rights criterion applicability to the same sovereignty pair, rather than preserving a weak water-only explanation. Confirm expiration and saved memoranda create no later taking authority; do not treat this as a claim about post-expiration external powers.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "status": "UNSCORED",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source and applicability assessment."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2880",
      "priority": "life",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02880E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "14695ca1cc25bb7795fb5dae38e8d789429238245c56ab76de312ce9a55a0fe4",
      "decision_source_sha256": "14695ca1cc25bb7795fb5dae38e8d789429238245c56ab76de312ce9a55a0fe4",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Protect the Sanctity of Every Human Life: We call on lawmakers to affirm the sanctity of every human life, created in the image of God, by securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death. The Legislature must repeal Penal Code Sections 19.06, 22.12, and Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 71.003(c); pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking; hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life; protect fetal life from destructive practices, such as IVF (in vitro fertilization) and commercial surrogacy; promote Natural Procreative Technologies (NaPro) to help women conceive children naturally; protect vulnerable patients at any stage of life from involuntary termination in medical settings.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Abortion-drug civil enforcement and liability for officials obstructing specified claims",
      "scored_requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy. Create personal accountability for officials obstructing the specified abortion-drug civil actions.",
      "scope_explanation": "Two applicable equal-weight criteria: new enforcement tools+1 and specific official accountability+1;2/2×100=100. Unchanged criminal penalties and other separate demands are excluded, not counted as fulfilled.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "life-trafficking-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy.",
          "official_requirement": "new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section2,171A.051–.052,.101–.108,.151–.157",
          "excerpt": "statutory damages in an amount of not less than $100,000",
          "reason": "Adds separate wrongful-death/personal-injury liability and a qui tam remedy including injunctions and at least$100,000 statutory damages per violation, with defined defenses, limitations and independent-law preservation. The new civil tool addresses suppliers and facilitators of prohibited abortion drugs. Medical-emergency treatment, ectopic-pregnancy removal, miscarriage care and non-abortion prescribing are not treated as abortion trafficking. Constitutional/federal defenses and claimant disqualification are not invented priority conflicts. Excluding the pregnant patient from this new supplier-directed remedy is disclosed; existing criminal/civil exceptions are not repealed and no comprehensive equal-protection fulfillment is claimed. Independent enforcement of other laws is preserved by171A.052(c)."
        },
        {
          "id": "life-official-accountability",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Create personal accountability for officials obstructing the specified abortion-drug civil actions.",
          "official_requirement": "hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section2,171A.407",
          "excerpt": "may bring an action against an officer, employee, or agent",
          "reason": "Creates damages/injunction liability when an official issues,enforces or obeys specified judicial relief that delays/prevents a claimant, removes listed immunity/indemnity and representation protections. Scoped accountability is satisfied; no claim of liability for every failure to prosecute, nor prediction of constitutional enforceability."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "New criminal penalties; repeal of Penal Code19.06/22.12 and CPRC71.003(c)",
          "reason": "No operative amendment creates a criminal offense or repeals these provisions in any assessed version. The custom scoped method does not deduct for a separate unchanged demand. Civil remedies are not described as criminal penalties. New civil exceptions are still examined within the enforcement criterion."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "IVF, commercial surrogacy, NaPro and involuntary termination of vulnerable patients",
          "reason": "These separate priority demands are not changed by these abortion-drug enforcement bills. No fulfillment is claimed."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Names the Women and Child Protection Act.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.001–.002",
            "assessment": "Defines abortion/drug/emergency by incorporated law; elective abortion and internet-service terms. Excludes specified internet access/search/cloud actors from this chapter; no broad statement that all internet participants are liable.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.051",
            "assessment": "Prohibits manufacture/distribution in Texas and mailing/transport/delivery/prescription/provision to Texas. Exceptions: protected speech/conduct, constitutional/federal limits, pregnant patient, non-abortion uses, physician emergency treatment, possession for entrapment, and federally directed conduct when preemption/immunity applies.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.052",
            "assessment": "Restricts new-subchapter enforcement to specified civil/qui tam routes, forbids triggering unrelated enforcement solely from a violation, preserves independently prohibited conduct under other laws. No existing criminal prohibition repealed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.101",
            "assessment": "New strict/joint/several injury and death action: contribution need not be actual/proximate cause, either parent may sue; excludes woman/federally immune conduct/sexual-assault perpetrator claimant; federal230 limit; no class actions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.102",
            "assessment": "Unawareness plus every reasonable precaution affirmative defense; preponderance burden. Lists unavailable defenses, including specified invalidated/nonbinding legal sources, negligence/consent, immunity and third-party claims subject to171A.251. Does not establish constitutional validity.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.103–.106",
            "assessment": "Market-share allocation when manufacturer unidentified; six-year limitation; nonwaivable right; emergency/constitutional/pregnant-woman/federal exceptions. These delimit the new remedy, not a repeal of independent protections.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.107–.108",
            "assessment": "Maximum constitutional jurisdiction and state-law application, no contractual contrary choice, anti-SLAPP/RFRA exceptions; government coordination/intervention barred for injury route but independent amicus allowed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.151–.153",
            "assessment": "Qui tam standing includes intended violations; political-subdivision actors excluded as relators, state also named. Woman/federal/unaware common-carrier and sexual-assault-claimant exclusions; no class. Defenses and six-year limitation.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.154–.155",
            "assessment": "Injunction, at least$100,000 statutory damages and fees; no duplicate statutory-damages/fees award for same violation; defendant fee restriction; protected speech preserved.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.156–.157",
            "assessment": "Political-subdivision coordination barred but independent amicus allowed; constitutional jurisdiction/choice-law limits and anti-SLAPP/RFRA exceptions. Unlike injury route, this coordination clause is not worded as a general bar on this state.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.251–.254",
            "assessment": "Preserves personal/qualified-third-party constitutional defenses and extraterritorial limitations; venue and no-transfer rules. Not a guarantee of enforceability.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.255",
            "assessment": "Counteraction damages, fees and at least$100,000 statutory damages protect claimants against specified retaliatory actions/judgments.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.351–.352",
            "assessment": "AG parens patriae civil standing to enforce existing criminal abortion laws, excluding specified chapters. This creates civil enforcement, not a criminal offense.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.353",
            "assessment": "Fee shifting for unsuccessful challenges, claim-specific prevailing costs, independent three-year recovery action, venue and limits on contrary judgments/contractual forums.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.401–.406",
            "assessment": "Immunity and jurisdiction restrictions against suits challenging/enjoining enforcement, defenses preserved, express-waiver rule, specified contrary judicial orders declared void. These protect enforcement; no prediction that courts must uphold them.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.407",
            "assessment": "Personal claim against officials issuing/enforcing/obeying specified orders that prevent/delay civil claims; injunction, compensatory damages, at least$100,000 exemplary damages and fees; immunity/indemnification/AG representation restricted. Specific obstruction accountability, not liability for every failure to prosecute.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-official-accountability"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Adds specified abortion-law actions/Rule202 investigations and30.022 actions to anti-SLAPP exclusions; other listed exclusions retained.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Express abortion-law exception to TexasRFRA, including taxpayer-funding restrictions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Adds171.2105 jurisdiction limitation on declaratory/injunctive invalidity challenges to heartbeat subchapter. No substantive abortion prohibition repealed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "New171A applies only to causes accruing after effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7",
            "assessment": "References71.02(a) as reenacted/amended but no operative71.02 amendment appears anywhere in this engrossed bill. Dangling criminal transition receives zero additional credit and is not supplied from another version.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 8–9",
            "assessment": "Severability and proposedSeptember1,2025 effective date; engrossment does not establish enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped analysis, not an official RPT grade or legal enforceability prediction. The number is a coarse ordinal anchor, not a measured fraction of lives protected. Medical exceptions preserve treatment of the pregnant patient; no medical advice is given. Provisional: independent audit required.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held for definition/source and denominator review. Full text and incorporated definitions now examined under approved scoped rule; no earlier numeric score overwritten."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.170A.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.170A.htm",
          "sha256": "d798470d847dcc32c85677992ea8f15a5671dfe41a0c076f7ae45922a490d154",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.268Z",
          "locator": "170A.002(b)(2),170A.0021–.0023",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.171.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.171.htm",
          "sha256": "3db9f482e5a949e5e9dec4bd9b13a6a64ed94c0ef771a5ee39dcc96b9e59bcfe",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.483Z",
          "locator": "171.002(3),171.061",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.245.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.245.htm",
          "sha256": "b3994387975f0e916faeb7ee6532ea36416ae9b331899048025c358bb4ff057d",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.308Z",
          "locator": "245.002(1),(4-a)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.108.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.108.htm",
          "sha256": "6811cf4dda691e1e41cbf5c577a00ae7afc10c3478e2691357ab72ffcc4ebaeb",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.387Z",
          "locator": "108.002(10)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.2402.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/OC.2402.htm",
          "sha256": "14a9b7a8fe22a63b9fa995dd2386027490992cf91507da2f4736e1b4e76a8bba",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.444Z",
          "locator": "2402.001 definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CP/htm/CP.71.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/CP.71.htm",
          "sha256": "7d6baa0ca92e792fc605ed278e5eb2de34e4a3a50435807648237ad8f0947523",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.347Z",
          "locator": "71.003(c)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.19.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.19.htm",
          "sha256": "a7f27e388df3c88c5742428edb109c8068d9bb033305038cec7d618d1509d84c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.263Z",
          "locator": "19.06",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.22.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.22.htm",
          "sha256": "003a726b550541141c252164fec707bc4e043554afc873ec01df2b53e31a5ebf",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.476Z",
          "locator": "22.12",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00031F.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/SB00031F.htm",
          "sha256": "e106246163a7a258e9a49e79546c1a97e1f3e6759c9d946398e17ebed21f6bd8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.154Z",
          "locator": "Sections3–5,9; changed medical definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "891",
      "bill": "SB 6",
      "priority": "life",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/891/billtext/html/SB00006E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "d3c2acf42cea0ef036050b0076d324d5d3ee2db7ee770dd5a06379be354f3620",
      "decision_source_sha256": "edcda0460aa0adc3846603be663a879b440e291d4360bf80c18ed602fcfd4ef0",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Protect the Sanctity of Every Human Life: We call on lawmakers to affirm the sanctity of every human life, created in the image of God, by securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death. The Legislature must repeal Penal Code Sections 19.06, 22.12, and Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 71.003(c); pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking; hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life; protect fetal life from destructive practices, such as IVF (in vitro fertilization) and commercial surrogacy; promote Natural Procreative Technologies (NaPro) to help women conceive children naturally; protect vulnerable patients at any stage of life from involuntary termination in medical settings.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Abortion-drug qui tam enforcement and Attorney General civil remedies",
      "scored_requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy.",
      "scope_explanation": "One applicable equal-weight new-enforcement-tools criterion: satisfied1/1×100=100 within the reviewed civil tool. No criminal-penalty or whole-priority-fulfillment claim.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "life-trafficking-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy.",
          "official_requirement": "new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section2,171A.051–.052,.151–.158,.251–.252",
          "excerpt": "statutory damages in an amount of not less than $100,000",
          "reason": "Creates private qui tam assignment with injunctions and at least$100,000 damages per violation, plus AG civil standing for specified existing state/federal violations or intended violations. The provider/manufacturer/carrier exclusion requires every reasonable precaution, including a policy limiting activity to exempt purposes; it is not HB7’s categorical in-state-provider exclusion. The new civil tool addresses suppliers and facilitators of prohibited abortion drugs. Medical-emergency treatment, ectopic-pregnancy removal, miscarriage care and non-abortion prescribing are not treated as abortion trafficking. Constitutional/federal defenses and claimant disqualification are not invented priority conflicts. Excluding the pregnant patient from this new supplier-directed remedy is disclosed; existing criminal/civil exceptions are not repealed and no comprehensive equal-protection fulfillment is claimed. Independent enforcement of other laws is preserved by171A.052(c)."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "New criminal penalties; repeal of Penal Code19.06/22.12 and CPRC71.003(c)",
          "reason": "No operative amendment creates a criminal offense or repeals these provisions in any assessed version. The custom scoped method does not deduct for a separate unchanged demand. Civil remedies are not described as criminal penalties. New civil exceptions are still examined within the enforcement criterion."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "IVF, commercial surrogacy, NaPro and involuntary termination of vulnerable patients",
          "reason": "These separate priority demands are not changed by these abortion-drug enforcement bills. No fulfillment is claimed."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Personal accountability for officials failing to enforce life protections",
          "reason": "No new personal liability for official nonenforcement. Government-coordination limits govern only the new private tool; independent enforcement preserved. Enforcement-protecting immunity/AGstanding do not themselves establish nonenforcing-official accountability."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Act name.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.001–.002",
            "assessment": "Incorporated abortion/drug/emergency definitions, internet access/search/cloud exclusions, solely emergency/ectopic/dead-fetus/non-abortion purposes; jurisdictional exclusion and interlocutory FifteenthCourt appeal for these exclusions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.051–.052",
            "assessment": "Prohibits manufacture/distribution in Texas and provision to OR FROM Texas. Patient/protectedspeech/exemptpurpose/federal exceptions; private qui tam only, independent other-law enforcement preserved.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.151",
            "assessment": "State claim absolutely assigned to relator, no retained state interest. Officials/political subdivisions cannot be relators. Federal230, patient, federally immune actor, unaware passenger-carrier and sexual-assault claimant exclusions. Provider/manufacturer/distributor/carrier safe harbor requires every reasonable precaution and policy limited to exempt purposes; not blanket provider exemption. No classes.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.152",
            "assessment": "Unawareness plus reasonable precautions defense; preponderance. Listed defenses barred; government medical immunity retained only for specified solely exempt-purpose care. Personal/qualified-third-party rights defenses preserved elsewhere.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.153–.155",
            "assessment": "Six-year period; injunction, at least$100,000 damages, fees; duplicate recovery bar only if prior order remains intact; defendant fee restriction preserves bad-faith/frivolous sanctions; speech protection.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.156–.158",
            "assessment": "All government coordination/intervention barred, independent amicus allowed; constitutional jurisdiction/choice-law limits; anti-SLAPP/RFRA exceptions; FifteenthCourt exclusive intermediate appeal.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.201–.204",
            "assessment": "Constitutional/extraterritorial defenses; state-law application unless overriding law; venue/transfer/contractualforum rules.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.205",
            "assessment": "Defines counteraction/clawback scope including specified existing criminal/civil abortion enforcement and enumerated out-of-state statutes; state-law/judgment rules subject to federal/Texas Constitution. Injunctions, compensation/fees and greater of2xcompensatory+fees or$100,000; prior judgment defenses limited; anti-SLAPP exclusion/FifteenthCourt appeals. Does not amend those other states’ laws.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.251–.252",
            "assessment": "AG civil damages/injunction standing for existing state criminal abortion violations (specified exclusions) or federal criminal mailing/shipping violations and intended violations. Express patient exclusion. No new criminal offense; no personal liability for nonenforcing officials.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.301–.305",
            "assessment": "Enforcement-protecting immunity, no-waiver, jurisdiction limits and FifteenthCourt review; preserves defense to liability. No SB2880-style personal official-obstruction liability.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Adds abortion-law actions/Rule202 investigations and fee actions to anti-SLAPP exclusions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "TexasRFRA abortion-law exception.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "171.2105 jurisdiction restriction on specified heartbeat-law validity challenges.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Expands30.022 fee recovery, nonsuit prevailing status, claim-specific costs, venue/appeals; independent recovery renumbered(d) but(e) still refers to(c). Preserve mismatch; no claim that courts will repair it or that it independently creates criminal punishment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7–9",
            "assessment": "Prospective new-chapter claims, severability, proposedSeptember1,2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped analysis, not an official RPT grade or legal enforceability prediction. The number is a coarse ordinal anchor, not a measured fraction of lives protected. Medical exceptions preserve treatment of the pregnant patient; no medical advice is given. Provisional: independent audit required.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held for definition/source and denominator review. Full text and incorporated definitions now examined under approved scoped rule; no earlier numeric score overwritten."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.170A.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.170A.htm",
          "sha256": "d798470d847dcc32c85677992ea8f15a5671dfe41a0c076f7ae45922a490d154",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.268Z",
          "locator": "170A.002(b)(2),170A.0021–.0023",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.171.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.171.htm",
          "sha256": "3db9f482e5a949e5e9dec4bd9b13a6a64ed94c0ef771a5ee39dcc96b9e59bcfe",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.483Z",
          "locator": "171.002(3),171.061",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.245.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.245.htm",
          "sha256": "b3994387975f0e916faeb7ee6532ea36416ae9b331899048025c358bb4ff057d",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.308Z",
          "locator": "245.002(1),(4-a)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.108.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.108.htm",
          "sha256": "6811cf4dda691e1e41cbf5c577a00ae7afc10c3478e2691357ab72ffcc4ebaeb",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.387Z",
          "locator": "108.002(10)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.2402.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/OC.2402.htm",
          "sha256": "14a9b7a8fe22a63b9fa995dd2386027490992cf91507da2f4736e1b4e76a8bba",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.444Z",
          "locator": "2402.001 definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CP/htm/CP.71.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/CP.71.htm",
          "sha256": "7d6baa0ca92e792fc605ed278e5eb2de34e4a3a50435807648237ad8f0947523",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.347Z",
          "locator": "71.003(c)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.19.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.19.htm",
          "sha256": "a7f27e388df3c88c5742428edb109c8068d9bb033305038cec7d618d1509d84c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.263Z",
          "locator": "19.06",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.22.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.22.htm",
          "sha256": "003a726b550541141c252164fec707bc4e043554afc873ec01df2b53e31a5ebf",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.476Z",
          "locator": "22.12",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00031F.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/SB00031F.htm",
          "sha256": "e106246163a7a258e9a49e79546c1a97e1f3e6759c9d946398e17ebed21f6bd8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.154Z",
          "locator": "Sections3–5,9; changed medical definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "892",
      "bill": "HB 7",
      "priority": "life",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/892/billtext/html/HB00007F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "8ce5a78f2a6487a387d0af94afc48fb697c6736f651157ae68e45d6c614f69b9",
      "decision_source_sha256": "100e6b229b121e0141307a20c7972b1c56c4df0966416c68dd476f478e44857d",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Protect the Sanctity of Every Human Life: We call on lawmakers to affirm the sanctity of every human life, created in the image of God, by securing the right to life and equal protection under the law from the moment of fertilization until natural death. The Legislature must repeal Penal Code Sections 19.06, 22.12, and Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 71.003(c); pass strong criminal penalties and new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking; hold rogue officials accountable for failing to defend life; protect fetal life from destructive practices, such as IVF (in vitro fertilization) and commercial surrogacy; promote Natural Procreative Technologies (NaPro) to help women conceive children naturally; protect vulnerable patients at any stage of life from involuntary termination in medical settings.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Private abortion-drug trafficking remedy with categorical supplier and delivery exclusions",
      "scored_requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy.",
      "scope_explanation": "One applicable equal-weight new-enforcement-tools criterion: partial0.5/1×100=50 because explicit supplier/delivery exceptions narrow the operative trafficking remedy. No criminal-penalty or whole-priority-fulfillment claim.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "life-trafficking-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Add operative civil enforcement against abortion-drug trafficking, accounting for substantive exclusions within the new remedy.",
          "official_requirement": "new enforcement tools to fight abortion and abortion pill trafficking",
          "outcome": "partial",
          "locator": "Section2,171A.002(a),.051–.052,.101(d),.104",
          "excerpt": "while located outside this state",
          "reason": "Creates a substantial new qui tam tool, but171A.002(a) and171A.101(d) categorically exclude hospitals/physician groups, in-state provider conduct and specified delivery/ride/air-carrier activity from this chapter. These exclusions can cover the very provision or transport conduct described in171A.051 without requiring proof of solely medical/non-abortion use or unawareness. Manufacturer/distributor/common-carrier liability also requires proof of failure to adopt AND implement the specified policy. This is an identified coverage exception within the trafficking tool, supporting partial0.5; it is not a deduction merely because the bill is narrow or lacks separate criminal penalties. Other independently applicable prohibitions remain enforceable. The new civil tool addresses suppliers and facilitators of prohibited abortion drugs. Medical-emergency treatment, ectopic-pregnancy removal, miscarriage care and non-abortion prescribing are not treated as abortion trafficking. Constitutional/federal defenses and claimant disqualification are not invented priority conflicts. Excluding the pregnant patient from this new supplier-directed remedy is disclosed; existing criminal/civil exceptions are not repealed and no comprehensive equal-protection fulfillment is claimed. Independent enforcement of other laws is preserved by171A.052(c)."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "New criminal penalties; repeal of Penal Code19.06/22.12 and CPRC71.003(c)",
          "reason": "No operative amendment creates a criminal offense or repeals these provisions in any assessed version. The custom scoped method does not deduct for a separate unchanged demand. Civil remedies are not described as criminal penalties. New civil exceptions are still examined within the enforcement criterion."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "IVF, commercial surrogacy, NaPro and involuntary termination of vulnerable patients",
          "reason": "These separate priority demands are not changed by these abortion-drug enforcement bills. No fulfillment is claimed."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Personal accountability for officials failing to enforce life protections",
          "reason": "No new personal liability for official nonenforcement. Government-coordination limits govern only the new private tool; independent enforcement preserved. Enforcement-protecting immunity/AGstanding do not themselves establish nonenforcing-official accountability."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Act name.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.001",
            "assessment": "Definitions incorporate245.002/171.061, emergency170A.002(b)(2), healthcare108.002 and ride/delivery2402.001; hospitals excluded from healthcare-facility definition; physicians distinguished from providers.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.002",
            "assessment": "Categorical hospital/state-licensed facility/physician-group exclusions, conditional provider/physician exclusions and internet-conduit exemptions; solely exempt medical/non-abortion purposes; actual or attempted abortion not prerequisite. Categorical suppliers materially narrow the new remedy within its trafficking subject.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.051–.052",
            "assessment": "To/fromTexas manufacture/provision prohibition subject to explicit applicability; patient/exemptpurpose/federal/constitutional protections; qui tam-exclusive enforcement and independent other-law preservation.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.101(a)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Private relator absolute assignment, no government interest or official relators; violations/intendedviolations; federal230preemption.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.101(d)(1)–(3)",
            "assessment": "Patient/federally immune exclusions; claimant disqualification for specified sexual assault, family violence finding, nonconsensualdrugprovision, stalking conviction and actinginconcert. Not every family member qualifies automatically.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.101(d)(4)–(9)",
            "assessment": "Express ride/delivery/air-carrier exclusions; providers/physicians require proof of out-of-state conduct; manufacturers/distributors/commoncarriers require failed adoption/implementation of exempt-purpose policy. These are not all conditioned on innocence or solely medicaluse. Partial criterion includes these gaps rather than redefining scope to erase them.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.101(e)–(g)",
            "assessment": "No classes; patient personal/medicaldata privacy restrictions; patient consent required for specifiedRule202 deposition. Not an automatic conflict or permission to disclose protected data.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.102",
            "assessment": "Unawareness+reasonableprecautions and personal/qualifiedthirdparty constitutional defenses, preponderance burden; enumerated unavailable defenses; medical immunity for solelyexemptpurposes.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.103–.104",
            "assessment": "Six-year limitation; injunction and at least$100,000 TOTALaward. Qualifyingwoman/father/sibling/grandparent receiveswholeaward; otherrelator receives$10,000 and holds remainder for qualifyingcharity withoutpersonal/familyfinancialbenefit. No duplicate intactjudgment award; fee restrictions preserve sanctions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.105–.108",
            "assessment": "Government coordination/intervention barred, independent amicus allowed; jurisdiction/choiceforum/choice-law rules subjecttohigherlaw; anti-SLAPP exclusion and FifteenthCourt appeals. No separate AGstanding or SB2880officialliability.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2,171A.151",
            "assessment": "Counteraction rules tied to thischapter; injunctions, compensation/fees, greaterof2xsumor$100,000 and anti-SLAPP/FifteenthCourt procedure. Federal/TexasConstitution savings; no assertion that all out-of-state judgments are unenforceable.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3–5",
            "assessment": "Prospective accruingcauses, severability,91stday aftersessioneffectivity. Enrolledstatus itself is not proof of governor action.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "life-trafficking-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped analysis, not an official RPT grade or legal enforceability prediction. The number is a coarse ordinal anchor, not a measured fraction of lives protected. Medical exceptions preserve treatment of the pregnant patient; no medical advice is given. Provisional: independent audit required.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held for definition/source and denominator review. Full text and incorporated definitions now examined under approved scoped rule; no earlier numeric score overwritten."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.170A.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.170A.htm",
          "sha256": "d798470d847dcc32c85677992ea8f15a5671dfe41a0c076f7ae45922a490d154",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.268Z",
          "locator": "170A.002(b)(2),170A.0021–.0023",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.171.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.171.htm",
          "sha256": "3db9f482e5a949e5e9dec4bd9b13a6a64ed94c0ef771a5ee39dcc96b9e59bcfe",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.483Z",
          "locator": "171.002(3),171.061",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.245.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.245.htm",
          "sha256": "b3994387975f0e916faeb7ee6532ea36416ae9b331899048025c358bb4ff057d",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.308Z",
          "locator": "245.002(1),(4-a)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.108.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/HS.108.htm",
          "sha256": "6811cf4dda691e1e41cbf5c577a00ae7afc10c3478e2691357ab72ffcc4ebaeb",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.387Z",
          "locator": "108.002(10)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.2402.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/OC.2402.htm",
          "sha256": "14a9b7a8fe22a63b9fa995dd2386027490992cf91507da2f4736e1b4e76a8bba",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.444Z",
          "locator": "2402.001 definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/CP/htm/CP.71.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/CP.71.htm",
          "sha256": "7d6baa0ca92e792fc605ed278e5eb2de34e4a3a50435807648237ad8f0947523",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.347Z",
          "locator": "71.003(c)",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.19.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.19.htm",
          "sha256": "a7f27e388df3c88c5742428edb109c8068d9bb033305038cec7d618d1509d84c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.263Z",
          "locator": "19.06",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.22.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/PE.22.htm",
          "sha256": "003a726b550541141c252164fec707bc4e043554afc873ec01df2b53e31a5ebf",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.476Z",
          "locator": "22.12",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00031F.htm",
          "file": "large-life-completion-20261102/context/SB00031F.htm",
          "sha256": "e106246163a7a258e9a49e79546c1a97e1f3e6759c9d946398e17ebed21f6bd8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:37:27.154Z",
          "locator": "Sections3–5,9; changed medical definitions",
          "role": "Official incorporated definitions or retained-law context; exact bill and temporal analysis control, not wholesale substitution of current statute."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 12",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00012F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "61e3ebd14f7838a82ca753c5ae2f2e1faa2d91f8386c43fa7eac57b901fc4e03",
      "decision_source_sha256": "61e3ebd14f7838a82ca753c5ae2f2e1faa2d91f8386c43fa7eac57b901fc4e03",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parental rights, grievance-reporter protection and school enforcement",
      "scope_explanation": "All31sections assessed. Three equally weighted scoped TPI criteria are satisfied: parental rights/consent/privacy, covered grievance-reporter protection, and directional administrative enforcement. (1+1+1)/3×100=100. This is not whole-priority completion or a tiered monetary fine schedule. Broader subject restrictions remain visible without automatic harmful-program credit.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "parental-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "requirement": "Protect parental decisions, information, consent and privacy in the activities regulated by this bill.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "locator": "Sections1,11–19,23,26–27; Education Code1.009,26.001–26.011",
          "excerpt": "A parent is entitled to choose the educational setting for the parent's child, including public school, private school, or home school.",
          "reason": "Adds express noninfringement, educational choice, information/records, health/biometric consent, grievances, conferences and club consent. Compelling-interest, other-law/FERPA, defined abuse-risk, special-education, recording and general-wellbeing exceptions remain disclosed. Routine-care consent may last the school year. These limits do not imply all public programs must be available on parental demand."
        },
        {
          "id": "reporter-protection",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "requirement": "Protect the covered student and parent grievance filers from retaliation and conflicted review.",
          "official_requirement": "provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct.",
          "locator": "Section20; Education Code26A.001(e)(1)–(3),(i)",
          "excerpt": "prohibit the board of trustees of the school district or a district employee from retaliating against a student or parent of or person standing in parental relation to a student who files a grievance in accordance with the policy;",
          "reason": "Expressly forbids retaliation against covered grievance filers, requires recusal and higher review, and permits certification-board referral for educator retaliation. This is not employee-wide or all-reporter immunity; the narrow covered class is disclosed without a breadth-only deduction."
        },
        {
          "id": "enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "requirement": "Add enforceable discipline, compliance oversight and remedies for the covered school duties.",
          "official_requirement": "implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement",
          "locator": "Sections3,16,18,20,22,28; Education Code11.005(c)–(d),26.009(d),26A.001,28.0022(h),39.008",
          "excerpt": "A school district shall take disciplinary action against an employee responsible for allowing a child to participate in an activity described by Subsection (a)(4) if the district did not obtain a parent's consent for the child's participation in that activity.",
          "reason": "Creates or strengthens discipline, review and compliance mechanisms for covered duties, with due process and express exceptions. Under the accepted TPI directional interpretation, this administrative enforcement aligns within scope. It does not create a tiered monetary fine schedule or fully implement the literal compound RPT demand."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Independent inspector general, new-contract screening, educator concealment agreements, marriage/adoption/divorce/50–50 parenting, obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "These separate demands are not implemented or repealed by the operative amendments; no breadth-only deduction."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Separate harmful-program elimination point",
          "reason": "Broader DEI, transition, instruction and club restrictions are expressly inventoried, but labels alone do not document family/privacy interference. Direct consent/privacy protections count once under parental rights. No established specific retained-parent-entitlement conflict was identified in independent substantive review."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Scoped parental rights, grievance-reporter protection and administrative enforcement",
      "interpretation_note": "Official RPT quotations remain unchanged and separate from TPI-defined directional criteria. Consent/privacy is counted with parental rights, not again as a separate point. No harmful-program credit is inferred from ideological or subject labels.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "Mandatory policy compliance and parental noninfringement; compelling-interest/least-restrictive-means exception.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Public facility/capacity reporting with security-risk confidentiality; administration, no extra point.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "DEI duty restrictions, discipline and due process; topic labels receive no automatic harmful-program credit. Law-compliance, instruction, data and other listed exceptions remain.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "Trustee-information heading only.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 5",
            "assessment": "Trustee-information update timing and annual reporting; administration.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 6",
            "assessment": "Frivolous suit/proceeding fee authority excludes school grievances and reserves IDEA rules; not a penalty on all parent complaints.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 7",
            "assessment": "Social-transition assistance restriction, reporting and grievance route; restriction visible without automatic harmful-program credit or assumed conflict.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 8",
            "assessment": "Charter applicability of listed duties, parental information and health advisory requirements; retained exceptions unchanged.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 9",
            "assessment": "Innovation-plan health instruction/advisory applicability; conforming scope.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 10",
            "assessment": "Uncertified-teacher notice applicability with retained statutory exception.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 11",
            "assessment": "Express parental rights and annual information; other-law/FERPA limitations disclosed.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 12",
            "assessment": "Choice among public, private and home educational settings.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 13",
            "assessment": "Adds access to child library-checkout records; other listed records retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 14",
            "assessment": "Instructional-material review notice on home page.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 15",
            "assessment": "Syllabi, parent comment portal, meeting comments and meeting-hour access.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 16",
            "assessment": "Suspected-offense notice within one school business day; discipline for encouraging concealment, subject to child-protection exception.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 17",
            "assessment": "Service-change information and consent; defined abuse/neglect-risk exception, ordinary wellbeing inquiries and abuse duties retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 18",
            "assessment": "Consent for covered examinations/treatment, recordings, health information, biometrics and care; limited annual routine-care consent, recording exceptions, discipline and records retention.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 19",
            "assessment": "Grievance coverage and specified extracurricular/IDEA limitations.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 20",
            "assessment": "Review levels, anti-retaliation, recusal, records, deadlines, oversight and repeated-adverse-decision testimony. Not employee-wide reporter protection.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "reporter-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 21",
            "assessment": "Curricular standards subject restriction; no automatic harmful-program point.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 22",
            "assessment": "Discipline policy for existing prohibited curricular practices; retained no-private-action clause. Existing underlying prohibitions not credited as newly created.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 23",
            "assessment": "Separate written human-sexuality-instruction consent request may accompany the specified notice;14-day request requirement.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 24",
            "assessment": "Sexual-orientation/gender-identity instruction/programming restrictions; protected expression, authorized health services subject to consent and specified organization exceptions. No topic-based harm assumption.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 25",
            "assessment": "Conference heading only.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 26",
            "assessment": "At least two in-person parent-teacher conference opportunities; performance notices retained.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 27",
            "assessment": "Club subject restrictions and parental consent; restrictions visible without automatic harm/conflict assumptions.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 28",
            "assessment": "Annual public compliance certification and policy/cost disclosure; not new monetary fines.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 29",
            "assessment": "Innovation-plan applicability before/on/after effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 30",
            "assessment": "2025–2026school-year implementation.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 31",
            "assessment": "Effective-date provision and legislative authentication; passage separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "parental-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending complete provision review and consistent application of scoped enforcement/reporter/program criteria."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.28.htm",
          "sha256": "8061486495055593a95e3511b8bf15d9f7552ec51dfc2f6df3a8c6c666d12e80",
          "role": "Retained context; later HB2495 school-enrollment and HB1106 abuse-definition changes are not credited as SB12 achievements.",
          "locator": "Retained statutory context"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.151.htm",
          "sha256": "a17b805ee6042e3600386f332788342a491d5777cfa075f1c3abd5d472a41eaa",
          "role": "Retained context; later HB2495 school-enrollment and HB1106 abuse-definition changes are not credited as SB12 achievements.",
          "locator": "Retained statutory context"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.261.htm",
          "sha256": "25ea0002ce06c0fd321e9c8cd4fb4e35d51ddfa0283414e90ebaf9d70bbcbe99",
          "role": "Retained context; later HB2495 school-enrollment and HB1106 abuse-definition changes are not credited as SB12 achievements.",
          "locator": "Retained statutory context"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 467",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00467F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "254291e21ac850a15adb0f85f214ac9b4808a62f481c83202c3260e2cb5a07eb",
      "decision_source_sha256": "254291e21ac850a15adb0f85f214ac9b4808a62f481c83202c3260e2cb5a07eb",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Cedar Creek Hospital District dissolution election and uniform-date exception",
      "scored_requirement": "Avoid adding an express exception to the Election Code uniform election-date requirement.",
      "scope_explanation": "One applicable criterion has a conflicting contribution of−1. max(0,−1)/1×100=0. This assesses the new election-date exception; it does not mean all dissolution or scholarship provisions conflict with the priority.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-code-waivers",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Avoid adding an express exception to the Election Code uniform election-date requirement.",
          "official_requirement": "remove existing waivers from Election Code",
          "outcome": "conflict",
          "locator": "Section2, added Section21C(c); Section1 conforming Section22",
          "excerpt": "Section 41.001(a), Election Code, does not apply to an election held under this section.",
          "reason": "Adds an express exception from the uniform election dates for this dissolution election. TPI interprets creating a new statutory exception as moving opposite the stated direction to remove Election Code waivers. The exception is legislatively authorized, not an allegation that officials unlawfully altered procedures. It affects only this eligible district-dissolution election, not all elections."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Two-thirds approval for bonds; alignment of bond election dates",
          "reason": "This is a district dissolution and disposition-of-money election, not a bond election. Majority approval is not scored as a bond-threshold conflict."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Citizenship, ballot language, photo ID, single-day/precinct voting, counting, party affiliation, donations and official penalties",
          "reason": "No new substantive changes to those requirements. Retained Section21A(c) exception is not counted as a newly created second conflict. Scholarship and dissolution administration receive no separate election-integrity credit."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1",
            "assessment": "Conforming amendment adds new21C(c) to the district statute’s Election Code compliance exceptions; existing21A(c) reference retained. Same date exception counted once.",
            "outcome": "conflict",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,21C(a)",
            "assessment": "New route applies only when district provides/pays for no medical or hospital care, every director position is vacant, no outstanding debt remains and money is the sole remaining asset.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,21C(b)",
            "assessment": "Kaufman, Van Zandt and Henderson county judges may jointly agree to order dissolution/scholarship election. No claim the election is mandatory or already held.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,21C(c)",
            "assessment": "Expressly removes41.001(a) uniform-date requirement for this election; operative adverse provision.",
            "outcome": "conflict",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,21C(d)–(f)",
            "assessment": "Prescribed for/against proposition; no additional action if majority does not favor it. If majority favors, dissolution finding, equal money transfers and commissioner-court dissolution orders within10days of determining requirements met. No bond authorization.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,21C(g)–(h)",
            "assessment": "Money funds Andrew Gibbs Memorial Nursing Scholarship; joint oversight, district-residence-at-program-admission and enrolled/accepted nursing-program conditions. Optional collaboration with qualifying higher-education institution in district boundaries. No additional election date waiver.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3",
            "assessment": "Immediate effect requires constitutional two-thirds legislative vote; otherwise September1,2025. Legislative effective-date threshold is separate from election proposition majority.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-code-waivers"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/EL/htm/EL.41.htm",
          "file": "new-matches-1372/HB467/EL.41.htm",
          "sha256": "de9e5876eb1f07d28051214501f8173932991509506def8de313e5f02d25c668",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:44:43.294Z",
          "locator": "Election Code41.001(a),(b)(6)",
          "role": "Uniform election dates and express-statute exception framework. This bill adds an exception; it does not repeal41.001 for other elections."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI custom scoped analysis, not an official RPT grade. A zero conflict anchor does not mean every bill provision conflicts, nor that the authorized exception is unlawful. Legislative progress and elected-official grades remain separate.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "New published1372-review match previously unscored; no numeric history overwritten."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4212",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04212E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "a6540c6be9e34a9287719acfe2bb4a44ae34c2c564a61ab710fdb560d4d818b6",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "a6540c6be9e34a9287719acfe2bb4a44ae34c2c564a61ab710fdb560d4d818b6",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI automated source-backed assessment; independent substantive and implementation review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Water-resource conservation grants and prohibition on financing eminent-domain acquisition",
      "scope_explanation": "All three sections of the exact engrossed version reviewed. Two equal scoped TPI criteria are satisfied: water protection through dedicated eligible projects, and property protection through the account-use prohibition. (1+1)/2×100=100. TPI water interpretation includes aquifers, recharge and other affected resources. No claim of enacted law, guaranteed appropriation, measured future outcomes or entire-priority fulfillment.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-conservation-grants",
          "requirement": "Provide restricted financing for projects that protect or enhance affected water resources.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1,31.205(d),31.206(a)(2)(C)–(D),(c),31.207–.209",
          "excerpt": "aquifer recharge area protection",
          "reason": "Water-grant eligibility expressly covers recharge protection, protective land/easement acquisition, at least10-year dedication of water rights for instream/spring/bay-estuary flows, and restoration or water-quality improvement. These are substantive protective project purposes, not generic infrastructure finance or an inference from absence of waiver. Application approval requires compliance and demonstrated ability to complete; priority criteria include ecological benefit and sustainability. Other parks/wildlife categories remain disclosed and do not receive extra water credit."
        },
        {
          "id": "property-no-takings-finance",
          "requirement": "Prevent the new conservation account from financing eminent-domain acquisition.",
          "official_requirement": "Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1,31.205(f)(1)",
          "excerpt": "to facilitate the use of eminent domain for the acquisition of real property",
          "reason": "The account may not facilitate eminent domain. This is a concrete financing restriction within the account scope, not abolition of every external taking power or a new statewide public-necessity/hearing rule. TPI treats the categorical account exclusion as aligned with the property-rights direction."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Grid controls; foreign ownership; civil forfeiture; agriculture biosecurity; water export/data-center/fluoridation bans; statewide eminent-domain reform",
          "reason": "The bill creates conservation financing and account restrictions, not these independent programs. Wildlife/land conservation is not automatically biosecurity. No new taking power, water withdrawal permission or discharge authorization is enacted."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "ACCEPTED_INDEPENDENT_SOURCE_INTERPRETATION_AND_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.201",
            "assessment": "Defines account, board, public access and incorporated agricultural/conservation easements. NR183.001 defines a nonpossessory interest imposing protective limitations/obligations; PW84.002 agricultural easements maintain agricultural/timber use plus specified conservation purposes. These retained definitions are context, not new achievements.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.202–.204",
            "assessment": "Creates eight-member board, chair, expense reimbursement and quarterly meetings; research/allocation duties include habitat, game restoration, litter prevention and land/water/wildlife conservation; optional technical committee. Administrative and nonwater activities receive no separate criterion credit.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.205(a)–(e)",
            "assessment": "Creates restricted general-revenue account with enumerated lawful funding sources, grants/matching grants and necessary/reasonable administration capped at2percent of annual disbursements. Earnings finance administration. No amount appropriated or actual grants guaranteed by this text.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.205(f)",
            "assessment": "Account cannot facilitate eminent-domain acquisition or acquire/transfer land for federal management. Does not prohibit all transactions involving federal matching funds.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "property-no-takings-finance"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.205(g)–(h)",
            "assessment": "Land-office agreement sets management/operation/financial standards; staffing assessment after balance exceeds$1million. No deleted administrative-support requirement imported from earlier version.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.206(a)(1),(2)(A)–(B),(3)",
            "assessment": "Permits parks/access/trails, farm/forest/easement, wildlife habitat and game-species research/restoration categories. These do not by themselves require every grant to protect water and are not treated as water achievements. No compulsory acquisition authority created.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.206(a)(2)(C)–(D)",
            "assessment": "Express protective water-quality/quantity projects: recharge areas, protective lands/easements,10-year-or-longer flow dedication, wetland/spring/river/riparian restoration and water-quality improvement. Soil/native grassland/wildlife restoration also eligible; not all are separately water projects.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.206(b)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Restricts eligible recipients to listed districts/authorities, local/state governments or nongovernmental entities; rules must consider matching funds,multiple benefits,long-term sustainability,integration,regional diversity and ecological benefit. No specific award/permit guaranteed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.207–.209",
            "assessment": "Planning/application assistance and application process; when sufficient applications exist,50percent allocation each to parks/natural areas and natural-resource conservation categories. Neither50percent block is exclusively water. Approval requires statutory/rule compliance and completion ability.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.210–.211",
            "assessment": "Rules and11-member governance committee support administration/application criteria; federal-match compatibility rule authority does not repeal express31.205(f) account restrictions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,31.212;Section2",
            "assessment": "Biennial benefit/recommendation/economic-impact reporting and initial report dueSeptember1,2027. Reporting mandate is not proof of benefits already achieved.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3",
            "assessment": "September1,2025 effective date in an engrossed proposal; no enrolled version represented.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-conservation-grants"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Fund specified water-resource protection projects and prohibit this account from facilitating eminent-domain acquisition.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/NR/htm/NR.183.htm",
          "sha256": "651fc6eb3834329c82ce1f9de1955cb10899ea9e7733c8196f8591830b52e5fd",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:45:17.391Z",
          "role": "Retained easement definitions and property-law context; current PW84 includes HB2018 amendments, not attributed to HB4212.",
          "locator": "183.001–.003"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PW/htm/PW.84.htm",
          "sha256": "b54aefab482f69e5f76602947c44a2801af437bb5796a89dbb53fce5ad6d3504",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:45:17.788Z",
          "role": "Retained easement definitions and property-law context; current PW84 includes HB2018 amendments, not attributed to HB4212.",
          "locator": "84.001–.002"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Newly published1372-review match had no completed numerical provision assessment; not a prior zero."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Review both operative requirements, complete account allocations, easement definitions and the distinction between account-financing prohibition and abolition of eminent-domain authority. Official RPT wording is unchanged; expanded groundwater coverage is expressly TPI interpretation."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 4582",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB04582E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "09dce427c4291ec01a6fd744fa31abf3ecd841dd473cfd767ebc57f269449f5a",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "09dce427c4291ec01a6fd744fa31abf3ecd841dd473cfd767ebc57f269449f5a",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Optional housing-related water infrastructure reimbursement with retained resource safeguards",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete specified-version provision inventory and relevant statutory context reviewed. One equal-weight scoped TPI criterion:1/1×100=100. Proposal requires independent audit; it is not full-priority fulfillment or a measured future result.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-operative",
          "requirement": "Facilitate water infrastructure financing within the specified development program under applicable water protections.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1,396.003(a)(1)–(4),(b); Section1,396.004–.005",
          "excerpt": "may reimburse the developer",
          "reason": "Optional reimbursement reduces eligible financing, installation, maintenance, renovation and connection costs. The new financing permission operates alongside the specified retained quality, appropriation and district safeguards. A sewer-system connection is not necessarily a wastewater-treatment connection; this conclusion rests on actual applicable laws, not that false equivalence. No requirement for an unlegislated statewide groundwater permit or proof of future hydrologic outcomes is added."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent sovereignty requirements",
          "reason": "No extra credit for unaddressed EMP/765kV/federal-incentive rules,foreign-land ownership,forfeiture,biosecurity or distinct water bans. Neutral implementation and retained protections are disclosed rather than counted as new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,396.001–.002",
            "assessment": "Defines qualifying development (at least7acres/50offsite residences governed by OC1201), broad utility/road infrastructure and population-limited counties/municipalities. Nonwater infrastructure is neutral to this scored criterion.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,396.003(a)(1)–(4),(b)",
            "assessment": "Costs must otherwise have been built/financed by locality;80percent lot/size qualification; public-water and WC26.001 sewer-system connections; eligible finance/construction/maintenance/renovation/connection costs. Sewer includes storm sewers and does not guarantee sewage-treatment connection.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,396.003(a)(5)–(7)",
            "assessment": "Requires maintenance/community covenants, offering units to specified military/first-responder/school groups, and compliance with FHA tenant-site lease protections required by applicable locality. Does not make all national FHA provisions a new unconditional mandate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,396.004–.005",
            "assessment": "Itemized paid-cost notice; locality MAY reimburse, capped annually at developer property taxes actually paid on project, with county unincorporated-area limit; eligibility ends when costs repaid or10years;90-day initial payment if locality reimburses. This is not property-tax elimination.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,396.006;Sections2–3",
            "assessment": "Annual itemized paid-cost reports; only post-effective costs; September1,2025 proposed effectiveness. No existing permit waived or project operation authorized by payment itself.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained water statutes",
            "assessment": "HS341.0315 requires public supply safe/adequate water; consumer safety is distinguished from aquifer quantity protection. Retained Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19) covers groundwater and surface waters and defines pollution/protective permit conditions;26.121(a),(c)–(e) prohibits unauthorized sewage/industrial/municipal and point-source pollutant discharges and permit violations.26.027 provides discharge permitting and generally prior treatment-facility construction authorization, with commission-approval and dredge/fill limitations. Applicable surface appropriations require11.134 availability, nonimpairment, environmental-flow consideration and conservation diligence under11.121 subject to its exemptions. Groundwater36.113 district review considers resource effects, conservation, quality and drawdown, subject to36.117 exemptions and district jurisdiction. These are actual legal protections, not universal permitting or guaranteed outcomes.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate water infrastructure financing within the specified development program under applicable water protections.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.11.htm",
          "sha256": "24e3aca8e73bf7cad479fcb3dbc2a088e29fab2db235e9f00c66f1c059156a45",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:26.780Z",
          "locator": "WA.11.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "WA.26.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.36.htm",
          "sha256": "ca87df31552458ecb49a7b1fc3bc434d7d303710e3989afe7f705be48912adc0",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:28.377Z",
          "locator": "WA.36.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.341.htm",
          "sha256": "8601255031d15b3879a4a61ebdbdc74da7b72957fc432fb7d8eec88f4160103c",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:29.977Z",
          "locator": "HS.341.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.1201.htm",
          "file": "OC.1201.htm",
          "sha256": "072e7f6841fd98033a88995f284a7d4040eb0974dcb66b7273b70931db5c6cc1",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:43.065Z",
          "locator": "OC.1201.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify full provision inventory, adverse-provision applicability and the scoped criterion. Retained protection laws are evidence of operating safeguards, not newly enacted accomplishments. Existing jurisdictional exceptions are disclosed and not presumed newly expanded."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3010",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03010E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "9feeaa54c70e68ae045af965027954550bb6fbbc1765f5324d447098f2a39174",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "9feeaa54c70e68ae045af965027954550bb6fbbc1765f5324d447098f2a39174",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Rural disaster-damaged water infrastructure repair financing",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete specified-version provision inventory and relevant statutory context reviewed. One equal-weight scoped TPI criterion:1/1×100=100. Proposal requires independent audit; it is not full-priority fulfillment or a measured future result.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-operative",
          "requirement": "Facilitate eligible damaged water infrastructure repair under applicable resource-protection requirements.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1,418.081–.082; Section1,418.084–.085",
          "excerpt": "rebuilding and repairing critical infrastructure damaged by a disaster",
          "reason": "Creates grants restricted to repairing/rebuilding disaster-damaged critical infrastructure, including water intake/treatment/pumping/storage/transmission and wastewater works. Operative retained discharge and resource safeguards apply according to the actual activity; no automatic suspension is created. Existing disaster suspension authority is disclosed rather than presumed exercised or treated as a new harmful provision."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent sovereignty requirements",
          "reason": "No extra credit for unaddressed EMP/765kV/federal-incentive rules,foreign-land ownership,forfeiture,biosecurity or distinct water bans. Neutral implementation and retained protections are disclosed rather than counted as new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,418.081–.082",
            "assessment": "Defines infrastructure including water/wastewater and nonwater roads/schools/hospitals/airports; governor-declared disaster area; creates appropriated-money grant program for rural repair/rebuilding. Nonwater assets not credited as water achievements.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,418.083",
            "assessment": "Eligibility county:population under100000,GDP under$2billion,poverty above15percent,disaster location and damage above10percent preceding state/local sales tax collections; other subdivisions in eligible counties qualify.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,418.084–.085",
            "assessment": "Grant restricted to disaster-damaged critical infrastructure/public calamity; application identifies project,cost and lack of FEMA funding eligibility. No funding or construction approval guaranteed.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,418.086–.087;Section2",
            "assessment": "Dedicated account from appropriations/gifts/earnings; grants and reasonable administration only; rulemaking; September1,2025 proposed effect.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained protection and emergency context",
            "assessment": "Retained Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19) covers groundwater and surface waters and defines pollution/protective permit conditions;26.121(a),(c)–(e) prohibits unauthorized sewage/industrial/municipal and point-source pollutant discharges and permit violations.26.027 provides discharge permitting and generally prior treatment-facility construction authorization, with commission-approval and dredge/fill limitations. Applicable surface appropriations require11.134 availability, nonimpairment, environmental-flow consideration and conservation diligence under11.121 subject to its exemptions. Groundwater36.113 district review considers resource effects, conservation, quality and drawdown, subject to36.117 exemptions and district jurisdiction. These are actual legal protections, not universal permitting or guaranteed outcomes. Government Code418.016(a) separately allows governor suspension of regulatory procedures or agency orders/rules if strict compliance impedes disaster action. It is discretionary, not automatic; HB3010 does not exercise or expand it. The score addresses proposed financing direction in this engrossed version, not an assumption all emergency waivers are used or none ever are.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate eligible damaged water infrastructure repair under applicable resource-protection requirements.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.11.htm",
          "sha256": "24e3aca8e73bf7cad479fcb3dbc2a088e29fab2db235e9f00c66f1c059156a45",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:26.780Z",
          "locator": "WA.11.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "WA.26.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.36.htm",
          "sha256": "ca87df31552458ecb49a7b1fc3bc434d7d303710e3989afe7f705be48912adc0",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:28.377Z",
          "locator": "WA.36.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/GV/htm/GV.418.htm",
          "sha256": "84abfb477aef5a5171e9c0d02f52c5b76539193ea2bb920fd94cb2966971964f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:30.979Z",
          "locator": "GV.418.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify full provision inventory, adverse-provision applicability and the scoped criterion. Retained protection laws are evidence of operating safeguards, not newly enacted accomplishments. Existing jurisdictional exceptions are disclosed and not presumed newly expanded."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2091",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02091E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "d640df7d80f51aa127aadfc3550f1529508587010f5ebd6cb0409e5c07ce7b35",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "d640df7d80f51aa127aadfc3550f1529508587010f5ebd6cb0409e5c07ce7b35",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Drainage-district water-supply grant eligibility and prioritization",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete specified-version provision inventory and relevant statutory context reviewed. One equal-weight scoped TPI criterion:1/1×100=100. Proposal requires independent audit; it is not full-priority fulfillment or a measured future result.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-operative",
          "requirement": "Expand eligible water-supply financing while retaining applicable water-resource protections.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1,15.102(b); Section1,15.102(e); Section2,15.437(d)",
          "excerpt": "grants to drainage districts",
          "reason": "Adds drainage-district water-supply grants, including flood-control components, and priority consideration. Removes historical-use-data, retail-service and CCN eligibility barriers for those grants; does not authorize unlawful withdrawal/discharge or eliminate existing survey-return duties. Water-resource protection is demonstrated by the mapped substantive statutes, not merely by mentioning conservation."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent sovereignty requirements",
          "reason": "No extra credit for unaddressed EMP/765kV/federal-incentive rules,foreign-land ownership,forfeiture,biosecurity or distinct water bans. Neutral implementation and retained protections are disclosed rather than counted as new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,15.102(b)",
            "assessment": "Adds grants for constitutionally established drainage-district water-supply projects, including flood-control; prior funding categories are retained context, not new accomplishments.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section1,15.102(e)",
            "assessment": "Board cannot disqualify specified grant because district lacks historical water-use data,retail service orCCN. WC16.012(m) actual-survey return duty and permit consequence are not expressly repealed. Do not conflate absence of historical data with refusal to return a survey.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,15.437(d)",
            "assessment": "Adds flood-control water-supply project prioritization regardless ofCCN; retains local investment,repayment,leverage,emergency,readiness and conservation considerations. Conservation is a consideration, not automatic denial.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained15.102(c),15.437(c),16.012(m)",
            "assessment": "Joint federal/state application effluent-standard finding applies only to joint applications, not all grants; substantial population/regional benefit priorities and survey duties remain.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained resource protections",
            "assessment": "Retained Water Code26.001(5),(14),(19) covers groundwater and surface waters and defines pollution/protective permit conditions;26.121(a),(c)–(e) prohibits unauthorized sewage/industrial/municipal and point-source pollutant discharges and permit violations.26.027 provides discharge permitting and generally prior treatment-facility construction authorization, with commission-approval and dredge/fill limitations. Applicable surface appropriations require11.134 availability, nonimpairment, environmental-flow consideration and conservation diligence under11.121 subject to its exemptions. Groundwater36.113 district review considers resource effects, conservation, quality and drawdown, subject to36.117 exemptions and district jurisdiction. These are actual legal protections, not universal permitting or guaranteed outcomes.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3",
            "assessment": "September1,2025 effective date in engrossed proposal; grant authorization is not actual project completion.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Expand eligible water-supply financing while retaining applicable water-resource protections.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.11.htm",
          "sha256": "24e3aca8e73bf7cad479fcb3dbc2a088e29fab2db235e9f00c66f1c059156a45",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:26.780Z",
          "locator": "WA.11.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "WA.26.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.36.htm",
          "sha256": "ca87df31552458ecb49a7b1fc3bc434d7d303710e3989afe7f705be48912adc0",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:28.377Z",
          "locator": "WA.36.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.15.htm",
          "sha256": "aa9ee9319af4d5608a32824bd5d08704a87dfb365392be851bc32946e43d0bc8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:28.926Z",
          "locator": "WA.15.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.16.htm",
          "sha256": "75595e7ca2a45757c21fbfdde034c0cf8cdb11d3acdd1852b2c8cbad778293e2",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:29.411Z",
          "locator": "WA.16.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify full provision inventory, adverse-provision applicability and the scoped criterion. Retained protection laws are evidence of operating safeguards, not newly enacted accomplishments. Existing jurisdictional exceptions are disclosed and not presumed newly expanded."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 6",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00006F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "1ef38096867ebc62b555037c0ab364ad002b96cd43e322f2d92686ef55f73885",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "1ef38096867ebc62b555037c0ab364ad002b96cd43e322f2d92686ef55f73885",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Large-load electric cost responsibility and reliability procedures",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete specified-version provision inventory and relevant statutory context reviewed. One equal-weight scoped TPI criterion:1/1×100=100. Proposal requires independent audit; it is not full-priority fulfillment or a measured future result.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-operative",
          "requirement": "Assign large-load interconnection/transmission costs to the loads causing them and limit stranded-cost exposure.",
          "official_requirement": "ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Section1;Section7; Section2,37.0561(a)–(d); Section2,37.0561(f)–(m); Section6",
          "excerpt": "contributes to the recovery of the interconnecting electric utility",
          "reason": "New35.004(c-1),(c-2),37.0561 financial commitments and Section6 transmission-cost review directly allocate costs to large-load customers and customer classes causing system costs. This aligns with the fair-rate direction without claiming a specific future rate cut. Other reliability and water-corporation generation measures are inventoried, not mislabeled EMP protection or new water-extraction authority."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent sovereignty requirements",
          "reason": "No extra credit for unaddressed EMP/765kV/federal-incentive rules,foreign-land ownership,forfeiture,biosecurity or distinct water bans. Neutral implementation and retained protections are disclosed rather than counted as new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1;Section7",
            "assessment": "Covered large loads contribute interconnection cost recovery; nonchoice cooperatives/municipals pass reasonable costs through.35.004(c-1) applies to post-effective interconnection agreements.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,37.0561(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "PUC standards for new/expanded loads above75MW unless lower necessary threshold; successor interests covered; disclose overlapping service requests with commercial confidentiality. This is service-planning disclosure, not beneficial-ownership reporting.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,37.0561(e)",
            "assessment": "Disclose qualifying backup generation; emergency deployment/curtailment after other available market services except frequency response; counts as firm load shed; environmental/emissions violations not authorized. No all-customers backup mandate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2,37.0561(f)–(m)",
            "assessment": "At least$100000 screening fee with unused credit; site control; uniform financial commitments, refunds after obligations,capacity reallocation,planning information/confidentiality; local additional requirements and load forecast criteria. These limit speculative/stranded costs, not remove every risk.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3",
            "assessment": "Extends specified39.169/.170 applicability to cooperatives/municipals while preserving chapter applicability framework.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section4,39.169",
            "assessment": "Existing-generation/new-large-load net-metering notice,120-day study then60-day PUC decision; deemed approval if missed; conditions can preserve dispatchable capacity and protect stranded assets; pre-existing colocation/majority-parent ownership exceptions; limited parties,periodic review and public decision excluding confidential information. No adverse rate effect presumed from deadline/exception alone.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section4,39.170",
            "assessment": "Post-2025 transmission-customer load-shed protocol except dangerous/life-threatening critical industrial loads (17.002) and designated critical gas facilities(38.074). Competitive75MW demand reductions,24-hour notice and no overlapping-price/service participation; not a765kV project or EMP mandate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section5,67.0115",
            "assessment": "Water corporations may generate power for specified pumping/treatment; qualifying wholesale/sewer corporation in county under350000 may sell incidental excess if registered and primarily serving listed uses. Proceeds restricted to power costs or67.002 purposes subject67.004 nonprofit law. Does not newly permit water withdrawal/discharge.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section6",
            "assessment": "PUC evaluates wholesale four-peak/alternative methods,nonbypassable costs and retail allocation by cost-causing customer class; starts within90days and amends rules byDecember31,2026. This is operative fair-allocation duty, not guaranteed bill savings.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section8",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effectiveness orSeptember1,2025.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Assign large-load interconnection/transmission costs to the loads causing them and limit stranded-cost exposure.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.67.htm",
          "sha256": "e0d3655d356c10ab70d6c3e931f9ae2c750b248cef6b94ca27ff97f7a08ecf64",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:59.059Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline",
          "locator": "WA.67.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/UT/htm/UT.17.htm",
          "file": "UT.17.htm",
          "sha256": "ddf85ec8a49da4d1235b7c99d6c28ab9dbd8bc3d76f05f5801f5c566663f8f92",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:41.541Z",
          "locator": "UT.17.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/UT/htm/UT.38.htm",
          "file": "UT.38.htm",
          "sha256": "800ff4139d1f0bd9193ad952b0be6fd25a8a87923c189cc3ccad17644ac532e6",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:42.092Z",
          "locator": "UT.38.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify full provision inventory, adverse-provision applicability and the scoped criterion. Retained protection laws are evidence of operating safeguards, not newly enacted accomplishments. Existing jurisdictional exceptions are disclosed and not presumed newly expanded."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2368",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02368F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "6c9cab74f788d0db076a495de65430bb27ba04310e91ee0f95d85635ecd3dd9f",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "6c9cab74f788d0db076a495de65430bb27ba04310e91ee0f95d85635ecd3dd9f",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Foreign critical-infrastructure access enforcement and verification",
      "scope_explanation": "Complete specified-version provision inventory and relevant statutory context reviewed. One equal-weight scoped TPI criterion:1/1×100=100. Proposal requires independent audit; it is not full-priority fulfillment or a measured future result.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-operative",
          "requirement": "Strengthen enforcement and verification of the covered foreign critical-infrastructure access restrictions.",
          "official_requirement": "Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Sections1–2; Section3,15.035;Section6; Section4,39.151(g-8); Section5,39.360(d-1),(e),(j)",
          "excerpt": "not to exceed $1 million for each violation",
          "reason": "Adds up-to$1million administrative penalties for covered prohibited access and specified attestation-information violations, additional verification and attorney-general investigation, plus critical-grid employee screening. Chapter117 knowledge/designated-country/ownership rules and warranty-support exception remain. New enforcement confidentiality does not repeal required regulator attestations/verification; no claim of public beneficial-ownership register or universal foreign ownership prohibition."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent sovereignty requirements",
          "reason": "No extra credit for unaddressed EMP/765kV/federal-incentive rules,foreign-land ownership,forfeiture,biosecurity or distinct water bans. Neutral implementation and retained protections are disclosed rather than counted as new achievements."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Sections1–2",
            "assessment": "PUC penalty for regulated entity prohibited access agreement; separate maximum for failure to submit all required39.360information or knowingly false information. Maximum is discretionary, not automatic$1million.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3,15.034",
            "assessment": "Enforcement information confidential and protected from discovery/subpoena/compulsion except commission/agents and discretionary parties,law-enforcement/legislator disclosures. This narrows access to enforcement information; it does not cancel covered entity verification submissions. Official priority does not explicitly demand public disclosure of all enforcement files. No separate full-beneficial-ownership credit awarded.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section3,15.035;Section6",
            "assessment": "Includes utilities,municipals,cooperatives in administrative-penalty person definition prospectively; earlier violations retain prior law.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section4,39.151(g-8)",
            "assessment": "Critical-grid employee background checks may use DPS/private vendor; adds travel and foreign-government/political-organization relationship attestations. No automatic disqualification or guilt from travel alone.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section5,39.360(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Updates chapter references; retained registration compliance,purchase reports and no-control attestations include warranty/support exception. Retained obligations not new achievements.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section5,39.360(d-1),(e),(j)",
            "assessment": "Additional verification info and AG/PUC sharing; immediate market suspension on reasonable suspicion of covered foreigncompany subjectPUC dispute resolution39.151(d-4)(6); AG may investigate on request. GOV2275.0102(a)(2) defines ownership/control/headquarters country criteria.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Sections7–8",
            "assessment": "Controls conflicts with nonsubstantive code correction acts; September1,2025 effective date.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-operative"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Strengthen enforcement and verification of the covered foreign critical-infrastructure access restrictions.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/BC/htm/BC.117.htm",
          "sha256": "2bd5751f16fa09bcec19f6eb6877cb1a981b9c509a04b374250541a4c4b3cd32",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:58.066Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline",
          "locator": "BC.117.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/UT/htm/UT.39.htm",
          "sha256": "ac5336dbf2f763ddd9ffa5b367a76fe5216e6e3e0aad317de3a422e12beebaa9",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:30:58.878Z",
          "role": "Current official context; distinguish subsequent amendments from bill baseline",
          "locator": "UT.39.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/GV/htm/GV.2275.htm",
          "file": "GV.2275.htm",
          "sha256": "ce5e38c56cf09414229d57e80c767719a281376fc8830d6d1d65b2d8a3aff76a",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:42.407Z",
          "locator": "GV.2275.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify full provision inventory, adverse-provision applicability and the scoped criterion. Retained protection laws are evidence of operating safeguards, not newly enacted accomplishments. Existing jurisdictional exceptions are disclosed and not presumed newly expanded."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 7",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00007F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "9a4895c03f992321d420b4b4389fcdb56497ada3196bf8872a98ac7e4484b1f2",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "decision_source_sha256": "9a4895c03f992321d420b4b4389fcdb56497ada3196bf8872a98ac7e4484b1f2",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Water-supply infrastructure finance, coordination and oversight with applicable resource safeguards",
      "scope_explanation": "All four articles and their operative sections reviewed. One scoped combined water criterion:1/1×100=100 proposed, subject to independent audit. Funding and infrastructure facilitation are tested together with specific applicable protection regimes; no universal permit requirement or measured future outcome is assumed.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-infrastructure",
          "requirement": "Facilitate specified water-supply projects while preserving their applicable surface-water, groundwater and marine protections.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "weight": 1,
          "locator": "Sections1.01–1.16,2.01–2.03,3.01,4.01; retained protection statutes identified below",
          "excerpt": "water supply projects that create new water sources for the state",
          "reason": "Expands and coordinates financing for desalination, produced-water treatment, reuse, storage/reservoirs and conveyance; reservoir eligibility expressly requires land and federal Section 404/state Section 11.121 permits. Applicable retained Section 11.134 protects surface rights, flows and conservation; Sections 26.121 and 26.027 protect state water from unauthorized pollution. Chapter 18 provides an alternative marine authorization route with treatment, intake and biological safeguards, the Section 18.003(c) salinity grandfather, and Sections 18.004–18.005 conveyance/discharge controls. Section 18.002(c) preserves alternative Chapter 11 and 26 procedures, including bay/estuary authorizations; the Chapter 18 bay/estuary restrictions are not universal bans. Historical Sections 27.153–27.156 provide ASR groundwater-quality, well-effect and monitoring standards. These are operative protections distinct from funding, with route-specific exceptions disclosed; no claim every current statutory amendment came from SB 7."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Electric grid; foreign ownership; forfeiture; biosecurity; independent water bans",
          "reason": "Bill finances/coordinates water supply and oversight. No new fluoridation,data-center fresh-water entitlement or identified large-scale private export/sale command. Imported-water rate exception is disclosed and not silently treated as an electricity-rate issue."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom scoped criteria are separate from unchanged RPT quotations. No numerical proposal is publication-ready until independent audit.",
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "1.01,6.301–.305",
            "assessment": "Appropriation-dependent joint planning,interoperability/technical standards and practicable excess conveyance capacity; favors existing easements to reduce eminent-domain need, not an absolute taking ban. Professional procurement underGV2254,optional committees and capped-fund administration.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.02,11.036(e)",
            "assessment": "Excludes imported-water/right transfers from11.036 supply-contract rules, including just/reasonable/nondiscriminatory pricing/control. This is a real rate-contract exception, not environmental-permit waiver. Fair-electricity-rate criterion does not apply to water contracts. It does not itself specify a large-scale private export or a Texas-groundwater sale.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.03,15.153(b),(e)",
            "assessment": "Eligible finance expands to reuse,imported water,land-acquired/permitted reservoirs,conveyance and specified transfers. Excludes conveyance of Texas-well groundwater outside qualifying project classes. Existing state-water rights can be acquired with this fund only by supply contract/lease from owner; no compulsory rights transfer authorized.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.04;1.06;1.09;4.01(b)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Conditional2027 brackish threshold>=3000mg/L at production,constitutional deposits and>=50percent allocation to new-supply/SWIFT until2047 depend on HJR7 voter approval. Proposal score does not assert ratification or currently operative conditional funding.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.05",
            "assessment": "Adds administrative,flood,economically distressed and agricultural conservation transfer destinations and funding-source clarification. Financial administration not new extraction rights.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.07,15.504",
            "assessment": "Retains project-approval restriction with administrative/SWIFT exceptions; adds rehabilitation,grants,technical assistance; portion for substantially permitted projects,conservation andloss mitigation;2percent annual admin-transfer cap and up-to$2m TCEQ permit-review staffing through2027 with2028sunset. Substantially completed permits is not permission to operate without required final authorization.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.08;1.10",
            "assessment": "Permits transfers out but prohibits restoration; creates administrative fund and eligible administration expenses. These financial restrictions do not independently establish water quality.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.11",
            "assessment": "Wastewater-planning feasibility/statutory-change study dueDecember1,2026,expiresMay31,2027; not immediate integration or guaranteed construction.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.12,15.703",
            "assessment": "Expands water bank activity to acquire/hold/transfer imported water for Texas benefit and market/environment information. Retains voluntary conservation deposits and donations for instream/water-quality/fish/bay inflow purposes; retained provisions earn no new-achievement credit. No specified private recipient or large-scale export is enacted.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.13–1.15",
            "assessment": "Expands state participation to listed new-water projects; annual bond authority$100m and nonrepayable-assistance cap90percent. Financial acceleration not property-tax elimination.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "1.16",
            "assessment": "Repeals16.131(c)50percent interregional earmark and16.146(h)post2024 assistance cutoff, as identified in official enrolled legislative analysis; neither repeal is an identified environmental-protection standard.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "2.01–2.02,15.009",
            "assessment": "Consolidates/renames eight-member advisory committee,addsTDEM,changes legislative appointments/staff/chairs,expands funds reviewed; recommendations discretionary while semiannual overall review required; removes2035sunset. Includes public meetings/quorum,expense rules,state-project feasibility,HUB reports,relevant contractor-record access and confidentiality protections. These oversight changes are disclosed; no separate whole-priority accountability credit.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "2.03",
            "assessment": "Repeals15.506,15.540,16.451(1),16.456 advisory provisions while expanded15.009 supplies consolidated oversight. Official analysis types16.541(1); operative bill says16.451(1), which controls. No invented environmental repeal.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "3.01,6.116",
            "assessment": "Requires public updated tool for supply progress,funded projects,net new/conserved/reclaimed water,loss assistance,transfers,cost/needs and funding gap. Reporting does not prove realized ecological results.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "4.01(a)",
            "assessment": "General September1,2025 effectiveness,subject to separately described2027constitutional conditions.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained surface/wastewater/produced-water protection",
            "assessment": "WC11.121/.134 authorizations,availability,nonimpairment,environmental flows and conservation diligence apply to covered state-water use,with statutory exemptions.26.001(5),26.027 and26.121 protect groundwater/surface water against unauthorized discharges; permitted treatment construction/commission-approval and dredge-fill limits disclosed.26.131 assigns oil/gas waste roles toRRC/TCEQ and requires applicable discharge water-quality standards; current new land-application provisions are not attributed toSB7.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained groundwater/ASR protection",
            "assessment": "36.113 district permits consider existing resources,conservation,quality and drawdown,subject to district geography and36.117 exceptions. Historical84RHB655§3 established27.153ASR safe-drinking-water/well-effect/native-quality considerations;27.154technical/recovery limits and federal-quality ceiling;27.155monthlymeter reports and27.156annualqualitytesting. Current27.153 also includes laterSB863/SB2885 provisions,not credited toSB7. No universal recovery cap outside statutory district scope claimed.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code 18.002(c),18.003(a)–(g),18.004–18.005",
            "assessment": "Chapter 18 is an alternative authorization route. Section 18.003 requires permits for nearshore or low-salinity diversions; qualifying offshore high-salinity diversions are exempt. Section 18.003(c) requires monthly salinity data and at least one year of qualifying data before unpermitted construction; a facility whose construction began after that demonstration need not obtain a permit solely because salinity later falls below the threshold. Chapter 18 diversions remain subject to treatment, no bay/estuary intake, minimized impingement/entrainment and designated-zone rules. Section 18.004 requires authorization for bed-and-banks conveyance and a Section 18.005 discharge permit. Section 18.005 imposes receiving-water standards and applicable state/federal requirements, with route-specific discharge, location and procedural safeguards. Section 18.002(c) expressly preserves Chapter 11 diversion and Chapter 26 discharge alternatives, including bay/estuary authorizations. The Chapter 18 restrictions are not universal prohibitions under all routes; retained safeguards are context, not new SB 7 accomplishments.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-infrastructure"
          }
        ]
      },
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate specified water-supply projects while preserving their applicable surface-water, groundwater and marine protections.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.11.htm",
          "sha256": "24e3aca8e73bf7cad479fcb3dbc2a088e29fab2db235e9f00c66f1c059156a45",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:26.780Z",
          "locator": "WA.11.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "WA.26.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.36.htm",
          "sha256": "ca87df31552458ecb49a7b1fc3bc434d7d303710e3989afe7f705be48912adc0",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:28.377Z",
          "locator": "WA.36.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.18.htm",
          "file": "WA.18.htm",
          "sha256": "57f575008e2bffae16e0651f090ddd74e7704b9b847e517e623a95259ac2dd85",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:43.263Z",
          "locator": "WA.18.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/analysis/html/SB00007F.htm",
          "file": "SB7-analysis.htm",
          "sha256": "0aad17e4cdd2d4b31e05a0b155c03963d86aeddb55b828c396836342688dda3f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:22:43.538Z",
          "locator": "SB00007F.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.27.htm",
          "file": "WA.27.htm",
          "sha256": "deef2b7898981ae0265a1de48a8515900171f24695766610a2a90dc44677c4b4",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T03:23:45.473Z",
          "locator": "WA.27.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/HB00655F.htm",
          "sha256": "7f641d063adec7fc18356db2ee01aa9c60ab4e6533b55ff294f820f797ef0751",
          "locator": "Section3,27.153–.157",
          "role": "Historical retainedASRrequirements; later2025amendments distinguished."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously held while operative safeguards and incorporated exceptions were researched; no previous numerical grade."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Audit combined water applicability across all financed classes, imported-water rate exception, expanded water-bank transfer scope and advisory consolidation. Primary enrolled analysis used to identify repealers; its16.541 typo corrected to operative16.451, not silently propagated. Assess actual legal safeguards without assuming future outcomes or all possible disaster/project exceptions are used."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2392",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02392E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "b0068d28a7e88d54a448c5d800b406275489d768a50acf55fc848d578849bf47",
      "decision_source_sha256": "b0068d28a7e88d54a448c5d800b406275489d768a50acf55fc848d578849bf47",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; supplied decision fingerprint retained separately",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Accountability for reporting specified school-related criminal conduct",
      "scope_explanation": "All four sections reviewed. One scoped enforcement criterion, weight1, contributes1:1/1×100=100. It evaluates new school reporting duties and penalties; not wholesale fulfillment of all priority reforms. Independent audit pending.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-enforcement",
          "weight": 1,
          "official_requirement": "implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement",
          "requirement": "Require prompt reporting of the specified school-related criminal conduct and apply escalating daily financial consequences for failure.",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1; Education Code37.015(a),(a-1),(c-1),(g),(g-1); Section2 repealed37.015(c)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 37.015, Education Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (a-1), (c-1), (g), and (g-1) to read as follows: (a) The principal of a public or private primary or secondary school, or a person designated by the principal under Subsection (d), shall notify the chief administrative officer of the school and any school district police department and the police department of the municipality in which the school is located or, if the school is not in a municipality, the sheriff of the county in which the school is located if the principal has reasonable grounds to believe that any of the following activities occur in school, on school property, or at a school-sponsored or school-related activity on or off school property, whether or not the activity is investigated by school security officers: (1) conduct that may constitute an offense listed under Section 508.149, Government Code; (2) deadly conduct under Section 22.05, Penal Code; (3) a terroristic threat under Section 22.07, Penal Code; (4) the use, sale, or possession of a controlled substance, drug paraphernalia, or marihuana under Chapter 481, Health and Safety Code; (5) the possession of any of the weapons or devices listed under Sections 46.01(1)-(14) or Section 46.01(16), Penal Code; (6) conduct that may constitute a criminal offense under Section 71.02, Penal Code; [ [DELETED] or [/DELETED] ] (7) conduct that may constitute a criminal offense for which a student may be expelled under Section 37.007(a), (d), or (e) ; (8) conduct that may constitute a criminal offense under Section 20A.02, 20A.03, 21.02, 21.11, 21.12, 21.15, 21.16, 21.165, 21.18, 21.19, 22.011, 22.021, 43.23, 43.24, 43.25, 43.26, or 43.262, Penal Code; or (9) conduct that may constitute a felony of the first degree under Section 22.04, Penal Code . (a-1) The chief administrative officer of a public or private primary or secondary school shall notify the applicable law enforcement agency described by Subsection (a) regarding conduct described by that subsection immediately after becoming aware that the principal of the school or the principal's designee under Subsection (d) has failed to report the conduct as required by Subsection (a). (c-1) Immediately after becoming aware of conduct described by Subsection (a), the principal of a public or private primary or secondary school or the principal's designee under Subsection (d) shall provide the notice required by Subsection (a). (g) A principal who fails to report or ensure the principal's designee under Subsection (d) has reported conduct as required by Subsection (a) not later than 48 hours after becoming aware of the conduct or a chief administrative officer who fails to report conduct as required by Subsection (a-1) not later than 48 hours after becoming aware that the principal or the principal's designee did not report the conduct is liable to the state for a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 for each day after the applicable 48-hour period that the principal, principal's designee, or chief administrative officer fails to report conduct in accordance with this section. The attorney general may sue to collect a civil penalty under this subsection. (g-1) The principal or chief administrative officer of a public primary or secondary school may not use state or local money of the school to pay a civil penalty assessed under Subsection (g).",
          "reason": "Adds chief-administrator notification, expands the enumerated school-related reportable conduct, requires immediate notice, and imposes$1,000 per day after the applicable48-hour reporting window. The principal is liable for failing to report OR ensure the designee reports; the chief administrative officer’s separate clock begins on awareness of principal/designee failure. The new subsection does not separately make the designee the civil-penalty defendant. AG may collect; public principals/chief administrators cannot use school state/local money to pay. The retained triggering condition is reasonable grounds to believe the listed conduct occurred; this is a reporting duty, not adjudication that a crime was committed. Section2 removes the separate exception where the person reasonably believes the activity is not criminal. Exact new Penal Code references are preserved rather than importing later amendments to their elements. This provides concrete school enforcement, not a new inspector general or general educator-screening regime."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Employee screening, independent inspector general, retroactive registry, concealment agreements, whistleblower reform; marriage/family-law reforms, harmful-program elimination and obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No independent change to these demands. Added reporting of listed offenses does not itself establish that all associated materials/programs undermine families, and existing good-faith protections are not claimed as new."
        }
      ],
      "scored_requirement": "Prompt reporting and daily financial accountability for the specified school-related criminal conduct.",
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional 100 is a TPI scoped alignment anchor, not an official RPT grade, percentage of the whole priority accomplished, measured effectiveness, or enactment claim.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1",
            "assessment": "New chief-administrator notice, specified added offenses, immediate timing and daily penalty after48hours, AG collection and public-funds restriction; all support reporting accountability.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Repeals37.015(c) reasonable-belief-noncriminal-activity exception; the operative reasonable-grounds reporting trigger remains. This tightens rather than creates guilt adjudication.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Prospective conduct; any pre-effective element retains former law.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-enforcement"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "September1,2025 effectivity in an engrossed proposal, not proof of enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-enforcement"
          }
        ]
      },
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending full source/criterion assessment. This is a provisional proposal awaiting independent implementation audit, not a replacement of an existing published numerical score."
        }
      ],
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.37.htm",
          "locator": "37.015(c)",
          "sha256": "947ae395bdaa8ccd7caa221c6d21dc74739c5573a6dcaabe2f63bd41d243efcf",
          "excerpt": "A notification is not required under Subsection (a) if the person reasonably believes that the activity does not constitute a criminal offense.",
          "note": "Current compilation retains this paragraph; other later amendments are not imported into the engrossed bill."
        }
      ],
      "context_limitation": "Offense-context inventory is supplied from current official compilations for reference. It is not asserted to reconstruct every historical offense element; the candidate quotes and assesses the exact list of references in the engrossed bill without substituting current offense definitions."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 1832",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01832E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "068d19299c1cdaacfc43e3e3f0680b71dc62f3bd946d5834abbb392435420c29",
      "decision_source_sha256": "068d19299c1cdaacfc43e3e3f0680b71dc62f3bd946d5834abbb392435420c29",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parent-directed education options following specified public-school employee victimization",
      "scope_explanation": "All three sections and each new 38.551–.555 provision assessed. One parental-choice criterion satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. The future educational-program regulation freeze is expressly disclosed and treated as neutral absent an identified contrary operative protection; no speculative future-law deduction. This is scoped TPI alignment, not whole-priority fulfillment.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Give parents of eligible victimized public-school students an enforceable, parent-agreeable transfer option or specified private/home-education funding election.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, added Education Code 38.551, complete section",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 38.551. SCHOOL CHOICE. The parent of an eligible student may elect for the student to: (1) be transferred to another school district campus as provided by Section 38.553; or (2) receive funding for the cost of educating the student in a private school, including a home school, as provided by Section 38.554.",
          "reason": "Creates parent election and eligibility from specified conviction/deferred adjudication, report evidence or detailed intentional grooming; does not require conviction for every eligible student. Participation ends at graduation or loss of public-school eligibility. Requires requested transfer to another district campus or a neighboring district when only one campus serves the grade. Destination must be agreeable to parent; ordinary 25.034 transfer procedure does not apply. District need not provide transportation. Provides annual state amount tied to district Chapter 48 entitlement; use restricted to accredited private-school tuition/fees or commissioner-authorized homeschooling items. Excludes federal and available-school-fund money. Does not guarantee private-school admission. Selected private schools cannot be required to comply with state laws/rules governing their educational program not in effect January 1, 2025. Explicit TPI interpretation: neutral in this scoped assessment because no concrete contradictory operative priority protection is identified. Not a repeal of all existing private-school law or immunity from all criminal, health or reporting laws. Future application is not presumed harmless in every possible case. Commissioner implementation rules must address fraud/abuse. Neutral administration, not a separate scored criterion. Applies beginning 2025–26 school year. Conditional immediate effect or September 1, 2025 fallback; this is an engrossed version, not proof of enactment."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Public-school screening and hypothetical future private-school requirements",
          "reason": "Official recurring-screening demand concerns public-school employees. Retained ED22.083(b) allows private-school criminal-history access. No specific existing applicable priority protection is shown to be repealed by the prospective educational-program freeze; possible future rules are not invented for a conflict deduction."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI-defined scoped interpretation, not official RPT grading or whole-priority completion. Prior null assessment preserved; independent audit required before publication.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 38.551–.552",
            "assessment": "Creates parent election and eligibility from specified conviction/deferred adjudication, report evidence or detailed intentional grooming; does not require conviction for every eligible student. Participation ends at graduation or loss of public-school eligibility.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 38.553",
            "assessment": "Requires requested transfer to another district campus or a neighboring district when only one campus serves the grade. Destination must be agreeable to parent; ordinary 25.034 transfer procedure does not apply. District need not provide transportation.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 38.554(a)–(c)",
            "assessment": "Provides annual state amount tied to district Chapter 48 entitlement; use restricted to accredited private-school tuition/fees or commissioner-authorized homeschooling items. Excludes federal and available-school-fund money. Does not guarantee private-school admission.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 38.554(d)",
            "assessment": "Selected private schools cannot be required to comply with state laws/rules governing their educational program not in effect January 1, 2025. Explicit TPI interpretation: neutral in this scoped assessment because no concrete contradictory operative priority protection is identified. Not a repeal of all existing private-school law or immunity from all criminal, health or reporting laws. Future application is not presumed harmless in every possible case.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 38.555",
            "assessment": "Commissioner implementation rules must address fraud/abuse. Neutral administration, not a separate scored criterion.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies beginning 2025–26 school year.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Conditional immediate effect or September 1, 2025 fallback; this is an engrossed version, not proof of enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.241.htm",
          "file": "HS.241.htm",
          "sha256": "98b63f177b6370e61b1ff94e0f81096acae7b228637bb6ec7ad59d1a1f5d78a8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:22.548Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/HS.241.htm",
          "locator": "HS.241.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.261.htm",
          "file": "FA.261.htm",
          "sha256": "25ea0002ce06c0fd321e9c8cd4fb4e35d51ddfa0283414e90ebaf9d70bbcbe99",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:23.331Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/FA.261.htm",
          "locator": "FA.261.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.22.htm",
          "file": "ED.22.htm",
          "sha256": "93aa84f9929adeca8b55adcd7f5eb5291f03972843c2ea85e118b0c56f80a9db",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:23.619Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.22.htm",
          "locator": "ED.22.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.38.htm",
          "file": "ED.38.htm",
          "sha256": "af5593d7f83d70ede010c2e6c9ccce580b8c1f4f82468af1740f5a3ee5db897d",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:24.238Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.38.htm",
          "locator": "ED.38.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.25.htm",
          "file": "ED.25.htm",
          "sha256": "51424447098f00079ee477bee708566ab30416bddd6709c7b79eda663ed982a1",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:24.738Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.25.htm",
          "locator": "ED.25.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.181.htm",
          "file": "HS.181.htm",
          "sha256": "d2d391689e4c481e7a843d0c576d0d1da96daa246d40161803953937b7bcea69",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:59.444Z",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/HS.181.htm",
          "locator": "HS.181.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Section 1, 38.554(d), exempts a selected private school from later state educational-program laws/rules. The effect of this freeze on otherwise applicable protections is not yet established; assess that substantive provision before a numerical score.",
          "note": "Prior local provisional hold preserved; this history does not claim a numerical score was previously published."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Give parents of eligible victimized public-school students an enforceable, parent-agreeable transfer option or specified private/home-education funding election."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 128",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00128E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "5ca7cf957d773e280caf63e9c99140ea7f46e481014b1a01ed96f54ee97f97bc",
      "decision_source_sha256": "5ca7cf957d773e280caf63e9c99140ea7f46e481014b1a01ed96f54ee97f97bc",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes; decision fingerprint separately preserved",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Hospital accountability for alternative-opinion information and abuse-related diagnostic coding",
      "scope_explanation": "All two bill sections and 241.451–.454 assessed. TPI interprets compelled monitoring of family-information practices and accountable diagnostic attribution as concrete procedural support for parental rights. One scoped accountability criterion satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. It does not establish a new duty to give second-opinion notice, create a new second-opinion right or guarantee access. Confidentiality and cure limits remain disclosed.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-family-rights",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Require hospitals to report whether families were informed of alternative medical opinions and identify the physician basis for abuse-related diagnostic coding, backed by reporting enforcement.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, added Health and Safety Code 241.451(a)–(e), complete section",
          "excerpt": "Sec. 241.451. SUSPECTED CHILD ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, OR NEGLECT REPORTS. (a) In this section, \"abuse,\" \"exploitation,\" and \"neglect\" have the meanings assigned by Section 261.001, Family Code. (b) Not later than the fifth day of each month, a hospital shall submit a report to the commission containing the following information: (1) the number of reports made during the preceding month by the hospital or an agent or employee of the hospital to the Department of Family and Protective Services under Chapter 261, Family Code, regarding alleged or suspected abuse, exploitation, or neglect of a child; (2) whether the hospital informed the parent, legal guardian, managing conservator, or possessory conservator of a child who is the subject of a report described by Subdivision (1) that the parent, legal guardian, managing conservator, or possessory conservator may obtain an alternative opinion regarding the appropriate course of medical treatment for the child; and (3) any code indicating alleged or suspected abuse, exploitation, or neglect that the hospital used for purposes of diagnosing or treating a child who is the subject of a report described by Subdivision (1), including, as applicable, the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) code, the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code, or another common identifier. (c) A hospital shall attach to each report submitted under Subsection (b) a signed affidavit from each physician who during the period covered by the report assigned or caused to be assigned a code described by Subsection (b)(3) for purposes of diagnosing or treating a child who is a subject of the report. The affidavit must include the name of the physician who assigned the code or caused the code to be assigned and a statement establishing whether the physician assigned the code based on the physician's direct observation of the child or based on information provided to the physician by an agent or employee of the hospital. The information contained in an affidavit required under this subsection is confidential and not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code. (d) If the information required to be included in the report under Subsection (b)(3) is not available at the time a report is submitted, the hospital shall include that information in the next report required to be submitted by the hospital after the date the information required by that subdivision becomes available and attach to that next report any affidavit described by Subsection (c) related to that information. (e) A hospital shall submit the report required under Subsection (b) in the form and manner prescribed by commission rule.",
          "reason": "Defines abuse/exploitation/neglect by FA261.001; requires monthly hospital report by fifth day with report counts, whether parent/guardian/conservator was informed of alternative medical opinion, and abuse-related diagnostic codes. Concrete monitoring of family-information practices is the aligned mechanism. Reporting whether notice occurred is not a mandate to provide that notice. Requires named-physician affidavit stating direct observation versus hospital-supplied information; affidavit confidential. Unavailable code information/related affidavits go into next report after becoming available. Commission sets format. Accountable attribution supports scrutiny of reporting that can affect families; it does not prove any reported diagnosis is erroneous. Enforces reporting, not provision of second-opinion notice. Notice and 15-day cure precede daily liability starting day 16; revenue-tier daily caps $10/$100/$1,000, liability stops on correction, and previous violations/seriousness/good faith/justice factors apply. Penalty money goes to commission-administered account. No requirement for immediate or uncapped penalties is invented. Quarterly legislative summaries and implementing rules. No express requirement to publish child names. HS241.153(9) permits required government disclosures, so parent authorization is not claimed as prerequisite. HS181.001(b)(2)/181.006 protect governmental-covered-entity PHI from public disclosure. Physician-affidavit confidentiality is additional. No actual harmful disclosure or categorical harmful-program inference established. September 1, 2025 effective-date provision in engrossed text; not proof of enactment."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate school-screening, inspector-general, penalty-tier, educator NDA and whistleblower reforms; same-sex adoption ban; no-fault divorce; 50/50 parenting presumption; obscene-device sales",
          "reason": "No substantive amendment implements or repeals these separate requirements. General custody, adoption or confidential-family-record provisions are not automatically changes to the distinct demands. These exclusions are pending independent applicability review."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Eliminating harmful programs/materials and funding",
          "reason": "No separate credit or penalty from medical, counseling, religious, electronic-record or technology labels. No documented harmful program is categorically eliminated by this assessment; direct parent-control/information changes counted once."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Creation of a right to second-opinion notice or elimination of allegedly harmful health programs",
          "reason": "Neither is enacted by this bill. Score is for monitoring/accountability supporting parental rights, not presumed harm from medical care, coding or reporting. Retained confidentiality is not presented as a newly enacted SB128 protection."
        }
      ],
      "interpretation_note": "Provisional TPI-defined scoped interpretation, not official RPT grading or whole-priority completion. Prior null assessment preserved; independent audit required before publication.",
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 241.451(a)–(b)",
            "assessment": "Defines abuse/exploitation/neglect by FA261.001; requires monthly hospital report by fifth day with report counts, whether parent/guardian/conservator was informed of alternative medical opinion, and abuse-related diagnostic codes. Concrete monitoring of family-information practices is the aligned mechanism. Reporting whether notice occurred is not a mandate to provide that notice.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 241.451(c)–(e)",
            "assessment": "Requires named-physician affidavit stating direct observation versus hospital-supplied information; affidavit confidential. Unavailable code information/related affidavits go into next report after becoming available. Commission sets format. Accountable attribution supports scrutiny of reporting that can affect families; it does not prove any reported diagnosis is erroneous.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 241.452(a)–(h)",
            "assessment": "Enforces reporting, not provision of second-opinion notice. Notice and 15-day cure precede daily liability starting day 16; revenue-tier daily caps $10/$100/$1,000, liability stops on correction, and previous violations/seriousness/good faith/justice factors apply. Penalty money goes to commission-administered account. No requirement for immediate or uncapped penalties is invented.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 241.453–.454 and retained confidentiality context",
            "assessment": "Quarterly legislative summaries and implementing rules. No express requirement to publish child names. HS241.153(9) permits required government disclosures, so parent authorization is not claimed as prerequisite. HS181.001(b)(2)/181.006 protect governmental-covered-entity PHI from public disclosure. Physician-affidavit confidentiality is additional. No actual harmful disclosure or categorical harmful-program inference established.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective-date provision in engrossed text; not proof of enactment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-family-rights"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.241.htm",
          "file": "HS.241.htm",
          "sha256": "98b63f177b6370e61b1ff94e0f81096acae7b228637bb6ec7ad59d1a1f5d78a8",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:22.548Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/HS.241.htm",
          "locator": "HS.241.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/FA/htm/FA.261.htm",
          "file": "FA.261.htm",
          "sha256": "25ea0002ce06c0fd321e9c8cd4fb4e35d51ddfa0283414e90ebaf9d70bbcbe99",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:23.331Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/FA.261.htm",
          "locator": "FA.261.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.22.htm",
          "file": "ED.22.htm",
          "sha256": "93aa84f9929adeca8b55adcd7f5eb5291f03972843c2ea85e118b0c56f80a9db",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:23.619Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.22.htm",
          "locator": "ED.22.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.38.htm",
          "file": "ED.38.htm",
          "sha256": "af5593d7f83d70ede010c2e6c9ccce580b8c1f4f82468af1740f5a3ee5db897d",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:24.238Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.38.htm",
          "locator": "ED.38.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/ED/htm/ED.25.htm",
          "file": "ED.25.htm",
          "sha256": "51424447098f00079ee477bee708566ab30416bddd6709c7b79eda663ed982a1",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:24.738Z",
          "scope": "Current statutory context; prospective amendment must be analyzed from its exact engrossed text.",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/ED.25.htm",
          "locator": "ED.25.htm"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.181.htm",
          "file": "HS.181.htm",
          "sha256": "d2d391689e4c481e7a843d0c576d0d1da96daa246d40161803953937b7bcea69",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:59.444Z",
          "local_file": "scoring-cohorts-20261102/family_b/followup/HS.181.htm",
          "locator": "HS.181.htm"
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "241.451(b)(2) reports whether parents were told about an alternative opinion; it does not require that notice. Before credit, establish the operative connection between aggregate accountability and parental rights, and assess confidentiality of diagnosis codes and quarterly summaries beyond confidential physician affidavits. Reporting topic alone is insufficient.",
          "note": "Prior local provisional hold preserved; this history does not claim a numerical score was previously published."
        }
      ],
      "proposed_score": 100,
      "scored_requirement": "Require hospitals to report whether families were informed of alternative medical opinions and identify the physician basis for abuse-related diagnostic coding, backed by reporting enforcement."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 612",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB00612F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "794b7aea17ba3e495db7676b67930cd9881baefdaf00bd0fb3b6c343062ac2fa",
      "decision_source_sha256": "794b7aea17ba3e495db7676b67930cd9881baefdaf00bd0fb3b6c343062ac2fa",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Cost-based developer fees for water and sewer pipeline infrastructure",
      "scope_explanation": "Both bill sections, historical geographic limits and specified retained pollution/construction safeguards assessed. One combined scoped TPI criterion: cost-based conveyance construction fees with applicable resource protection. Proposed1/1×100=100; independent reassessment pending. This neither predicts construction speed nor awards new-legislation credit for retained safeguards.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-scoped-infrastructure",
          "weight": 1,
          "requirement": "Reduce the specified financing or fee barrier for water infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected water resources.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams",
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section1,49.2127(a),(e); retained Water Code26.001(5),26.121,26.027(c)–(d);30TAC290.44",
          "excerpt": "actual, reasonable, and documented costs",
          "reason": "Section49.2127(e) removes fees above actual reasonable documented pipeline/subdivision costs, retaining cost recovery for review, engineering, inspection and repair. Actual retained protection is separately identified: Water Code26.121 prohibits unauthorized sewage/waste and pollutant discharges and violations of permit conditions;26.001 includes groundwater and surface waters. Wastewater treatment construction generally requires authorization under26.027(c), with commission-approval and dredge/fill limitations disclosed. Public drinking-water distribution is additionally subject to290.44 separation from wastewater facilities, protected stream crossings, leakage testing and disinfection. These constraints apply according to facility/activity jurisdiction, not because the fee cap itself is protective. Private/non-public facilities are not assumed subject to every public-system rule. Geographic limits remain; developers do not gain the separate retail-utility construction-restriction protection."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate mandates for groundwater/surface-water export, industrial nonpotable use and fluoridation",
          "reason": "Neither section changes these separate programs. No credit is awarded for them."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Electric grid, foreign ownership, eminent domain, civil forfeiture and agriculture",
          "reason": "Outside these fee provisions; excluded rather than considered satisfied."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 49.2127(a)",
            "assessment": "Defines the covered developer by subdivision or connection request; renumbers retained retail-public-utility definition.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 49.2127(e)",
            "assessment": "Caps developer infrastructure fees at actual reasonable documented costs while preserving cost recovery for review, engineering, inspection and related work; no environmental approval is waived.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Immediate-effect vote condition or September 1, 2025 fallback; separate from alignment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained Water Code26.001(5),26.121(a)–(e),26.027(c)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Context only: pollution controls reach affected groundwater/surface water. Sewage/municipal/industrial discharges and point-source pollution require authorization; other-waste plan and specified other-agency activity exceptions are disclosed. Treatment construction permits have commission-approval exception; Chapter26 does not itself require dredge/fill permits. No assertion that every pipeline needs the same permit or that water allocation is governed by these sections.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-infrastructure"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained30TAC290.44; TCEQ February2019 distribution construction notes",
            "assessment": "Context for covered public drinking-water distribution: water/wastewater separation, watertight stream-crossing encasement with isolation/testing, leakage limits and disinfection/sample requirements. These protect the supplied water and affected crossings; applicability is not extended to every private pipeline.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-infrastructure"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom water scope includes groundwater, aquifers, water tables, watersheds and other affected resources. Exact RPT quote remains unchanged. No automatic inference that every fee reduction protects water; the stated retained approvals and operative conditions must be evaluated independently.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/html/SB02185F.htm",
          "sha256": "f19856ed5bf2dcacbd391b6eb1aba58167c535b05f2130eab1c1b758a80393c1",
          "locator": "Section 8, 49.2127(b)–(d)",
          "role": "Original geographic scope and separate retail-utility protections; not credited as new SB612 provisions."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/WA/htm/WA.26.htm",
          "sha256": "abb4ffed0fd2cfce1f1752967abe72aaed6367d025fad0dd3c0afeb16ebcca6f",
          "retrieved_at": "2026-11-02T02:34:27.863Z",
          "locator": "26.001(5),26.121(a)–(e),26.027(c)–(d)",
          "role": "Specific retained pollution prohibitions and authorization conditions, with exceptions; not newly enacted accomplishments."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/drinking-water/plan-technical-review/forms/construction-notes-water-distribution.pdf/@@download/file/construction-notes-water-distribution.pdf",
          "sha256": "bb21e48881d751f2e8e9a2a71f607aa7d34658b98b95bf6ed4e7b962a03f462c",
          "locator": "2019 construction notes1,10–18;30TAC290.44",
          "role": "Official pre-2025 public-water construction guidance; explicit jurisdiction limits."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-clause-v1",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored while water-resource scope and legal-mechanism questions were unresolved. This is a proposed application of the approved scoped method, not a published score."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Decide whether the facility-specific retained safeguards plus actual fee constraint satisfy the scoped combined criterion. Earlier null is preserved; no reliance solely on cost recovery or absence of statutory waiver. If some affected activity materially escapes the mapped protection, identify it before publication.",
      "scored_requirement": "Reduce the specified financing or fee barrier for water infrastructure while retaining applicable protection of affected water resources."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "SB 2885",
      "priority": "sovereignty",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB02885F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "a4268c06e2cc47783458d94d02fe60fcf475f17716e560fb58e442a52de790d5",
      "decision_source_sha256": "a4268c06e2cc47783458d94d02fe60fcf475f17716e560fb58e442a52de790d5",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "Electric Grid Protection: Protect the Texas grid from large-scale EMP (electromagnetic pulse) and foreign-adversary cyber threats by removing vulnerable control equipment; pause uneconomical 765 kV transmission projects; ensure fair electricity rates for families and small businesses; and recapture federal incentives to preserve grid independence through conventional generation. ∙ Water Security: Ban large-scale export or sale of groundwater and surface water to any single private entity; prohibit data centers and new large industrial users from consuming fresh groundwater and surface water by mandating nonpotable water such as oil and gas wastewater; ban fluoridation of public water supplies; and expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams. ∙ Texas Is Not for Sale: Expand prohibitions on foreign and adversary ownership or control of all critical infrastructure and adjacent land; require full beneficial-ownership disclosure to prevent shell company evasion; and strengthen oversight of local authorities through Texas Local Government Code Chapter 391 Regional Planning Commissions and related tools. ∙ Eminent Domain and Property Rights: Require proof of immediate public necessity for all eminent domain actions with transparent hearings and prohibit the use of eminent domain for speculative private projects or by non-elected entities. If any revenue is generated on private property involuntarily taken, then that revenue shall be returned proportionally to the affected landowners. ∙ End Civil Asset Forfeiture: Abolish civil asset forfeiture entirely; ensure private property can only be forfeited following a criminal conviction that is upheld on appeal. ∙ Protect Texas Agriculture: Prohibit foreign governments, adversaries, and their proxies from owning or controlling Texas farmland, farms, and ranches; promote strong biosecurity measures and rapid-response eradication of harmful parasites such as the invasive New World Screwworm, while fully respecting farmers’ and ranchers’ rights and minimizing regulatory burdens.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Reclaimed-water aquifer storage under treatment standards and retained aquifer safeguards",
      "scope_explanation": "Both sections and incorporated safeguards assessed. One combined scoped water criterion proposes1/1×100=100: authorize reclaimed-water ASR through treatment standards while retained state aquifer duties and federal injection-endangerment prohibition apply. This is a legal-design assessment, not proof that any project is safe or that future treatment standards are equivalent in every respect.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "water-scoped-asr",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "requirement": "Facilitate treated reclaimed-water ASR while retaining applicable groundwater and injection protections.",
          "official_requirement": "expedite permitting, funding, and construction of desalination, wastewater reuse, produced water treatment, reservoirs, and conveyance infrastructure while protecting rivers and streams",
          "locator": "Section1,27.153(b-1); retained27.153(b)(2)–(4),27.154–.156;40CFR144.12(a),(c)–(e)",
          "excerpt": "the commission by rule or by individual or general permit may authorize the injection of reclaimed water that is treated in accordance with standards adopted by the commission for that purpose.",
          "reason": "Adds a pathway for reclaimed-water injection treated to commission-adopted standards, notwithstanding the state duty to consider federal-standard compliance in27.153(b)(1). That state consideration exception is not a repeal of the separate federal prohibition on injection endangering underground drinking-water sources. Retained state duties address existing wells, native-groundwater quality, recovery volumes and testing. The2025federal text expressly prohibits specified contaminant movement and provides ClassV action where drinking-water regulations may be violated. TPI treats the regulated authorization with those actual safeguards as scoped alignment; no future-quality guarantee or presumption that state standards equal all federal standards is made."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Separate mandates for groundwater/surface-water export, industrial nonpotable use and fluoridation",
          "reason": "Neither section changes these separate programs. No credit is awarded for them."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Electric grid, foreign ownership, eminent domain, civil forfeiture and agriculture",
          "reason": "Outside these reclaimed-water aquifer storage and recovery authorization provisions; excluded rather than considered satisfied."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section1,27.153(b-1)",
            "assessment": "Permits rule/individual/general authorization for reclaimed water treated to standards adopted for that purpose; overrides only the specified state consideration clause. The treatment rule is not itself a numerical water-quality standard.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-asr"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section2",
            "assessment": "September1,2025effective date; implementation and actual project effects remain separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-asr"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained27.153(b)(2)–(4),(c)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Must consider recovery, existing wells and detrimental native-groundwater changes; site boundary and notice provisions retained. These are consideration duties, not falsely described as unconditional bans.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-asr"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained27.154–.157",
            "assessment": "Technical/construction standards, district-specific recovery-volume restrictions, monthly metering/reporting, annual water testing and specified local authorities retained.27.154(d)retains a ceiling against state groundwater-quality standards stricter than applicable federal standards; no new achievement credited.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-asr"
          },
          {
            "locator": "40CFR144.12(a),(c)–(e),2025edition",
            "assessment": "Federal contaminant-movement prohibition protects underground sources of drinking water, not every aquifer by definition. ClassV potential drinking-water violations require specified director action; other adverse health effects and emergency powers have distinct triggers/discretion. Federal UIC regulates injection, not recovery; state retained duties address recovery.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "water-scoped-asr"
          }
        ]
      },
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_AUDIT_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI custom water scope includes groundwater, aquifers, water tables, watersheds and other affected resources. Exact RPT quote remains unchanged. No automatic inference that reclaimed-water ASR authorization by itself protects water; the stated retained approvals and operative conditions must be evaluated independently.",
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/HB00655F.htm",
          "sha256": "7f641d063adec7fc18356db2ee01aa9c60ab4e6533b55ff294f820f797ef0751",
          "locator": "Section3;27.151–.157",
          "role": "Original retained ASR framework, not newSB2885provisions."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title40-vol25/pdf/CFR-2025-title40-vol25-sec144-12.pdf",
          "sha256": "099993a1f215cbbd4414f9776ec1c594407017f429ce377875feacd60caf2aca",
          "locator": "40CFR144.12(a),(c)–(e),2025edition",
          "role": "Historical federal prohibition and ClassV controls; amendment history predates2025."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.epa.gov/uic/aquifer-recharge-and-aquifer-storage-and-recovery",
          "sha256": "8ad9c6e0debc89601c8e5b191e42989c427388302100c7ee1838de8c062f19d2",
          "locator": "UIC regulations for AR/ASR wells",
          "role": "EPA corroboration that state ASR regulations do not supersede federal endangerment rule; current2026guidance not attributed as bill change."
        }
      ],
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored pending state-consideration exception/federal injection-protection interaction and retained aquifer safeguards."
        }
      ],
      "audit_challenge": "Independently verify state consideration exception versus direct federal duty, applicable USDW scope and retained broader state aquifer duties. Do not equate a consideration requirement with a categorical standard or make an empirical safety prediction.",
      "scored_requirement": "Facilitate treated reclaimed-water ASR while retaining applicable groundwater and injection protections."
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2035",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02035F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "41b08ea0d8dd960b994a144d72c44e1393043a8a06a2f907a80b2100ed319f1a",
      "decision_source_sha256": "41b08ea0d8dd960b994a144d72c44e1393043a8a06a2f907a80b2100ed319f1a",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent implementation and interpretive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Parental notice after refused voluntary chemical-dependency admission",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact enrolled version assessed. One applicable equal-weight TPI criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. Neutral implementation and retained law earn no extra points. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the entire priority or a prediction of outcomes.",
      "scored_requirement": "Support informed parental choice by requiring notice of an alternative treatment option after a facility refuses a minor’s requested voluntary admission.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-family-right",
          "requirement": "Support informed parental choice by requiring notice of an alternative treatment option after a facility refuses a minor’s requested voluntary admission.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools.",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Health and Safety Code 462.022(e)",
          "excerpt": "A facility that refuses to admit a minor for voluntary treatment and rehabilitation under this section shall provide to the minor's parent, managing conservator, or guardian requesting the minor's admission to the facility written notice of the parent's, managing conservator's, or guardian's right to seek voluntary treatment and rehabilitation of the minor at another facility.",
          "reason": "The sole substantive addition requires written notice to the requesting parent, managing conservator or guardian of the option to seek voluntary treatment elsewhere. This directly supports informed parental choice. It does not compel either facility to admit the minor, fund care, or change the retained consent and admission rules."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent children-and-family requirements",
          "reason": "No credit for unaddressed school screening, inspector-general powers, tiered penalties, misconduct agreements, whistleblower remedies, adoption/divorce/equal-parenting reforms, harmful-program elimination or obscene-device sales. No breadth-only deduction: assess actual provisions under the approved TPI scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 462.022(e)",
            "assessment": "Creates the specified written-notice duty after refusal of voluntary admission requested by the parent, managing conservator or guardian. It is notice of another option, not a guarantee of treatment.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Retained 462.022(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Facility licensing and admission-policy requirements remain. A minor aged 16 or older may still request admission without parental consent; a state-agent guardian or conservator must still obtain the minor’s consent. These retained rules are neither new achievements nor newly created conflicts.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "September 1, 2025 effective date; passage and implementation remain separate from alignment.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/HS/htm/HS.462.htm",
          "sha256": "8702ead1c1c27c1a0abf7d9ec83a0af5e835adcb3dfc9bd0db10f69db91b67fd",
          "locator": "462.022(a)–(d) retained admission criteria/16-plus self-request/state-agent consent; only2025amendment HB2035 adds(e), lastprior2015SB219.",
          "role": "Official Health and Safety462.022 admission baseline and amendment history"
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_artifact": "next-review/bounded-five-audit/report.json"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped criterion is separate from the unchanged official RPT wording. A satisfied narrow requirement yields 100 under the approved method; it does not mean the whole priority is fulfilled. No specific adverse provision was established in the reviewed text.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored: published or approved source-backed match had no complete numerical assessment. This candidate has not been published."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2674",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02674F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "24b1a5106ee761530b8238ce79f702081b6dcca1e340d8dd53502389d9836487",
      "decision_source_sha256": "24b1a5106ee761530b8238ce79f702081b6dcca1e340d8dd53502389d9836487",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent implementation and interpretive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Protection of homeschool programs from rulemaking by specified education authorities",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact enrolled version assessed. One applicable equal-weight TPI criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. Neutral implementation and retained law earn no extra points. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the entire priority or a prediction of outcomes.",
      "scored_requirement": "Protect parental educational authority by barring the specified public education authorities from regulating homeschool educational programs through rules or policies.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-family-right",
          "requirement": "Protect parental educational authority by barring the specified public education authorities from regulating homeschool educational programs through rules or policies.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools.",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Education Code 1.010",
          "excerpt": "The Texas Education Agency, the State Board of Education, or any other educational institution described by Section 1.001(a) may not adopt a rule or policy that regulates an educational program of a home school.",
          "reason": "The substantive prohibition protects homeschool educational programs from rules or policies of the named agencies and the educational institutions supported in whole or in part by state tax funds, subject to the exclusions in Section 1.001(a). That is a concrete protection of parental educational authority. It does not exempt families from every law or bar every governmental actor. Failed amendment H22’s state-funded-program exception is not in this enrolled text."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent children-and-family requirements",
          "reason": "No credit for unaddressed school screening, inspector-general powers, tiered penalties, misconduct agreements, whistleblower remedies, adoption/divorce/equal-parenting reforms, harmful-program elimination or obscene-device sales. No breadth-only deduction: assess actual provisions under the approved TPI scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 1.010; retained 1.001(a)",
            "assessment": "Prohibits regulation of homeschool educational programs through rules or policies of TEA, SBOE and the other educational institutions supported in whole or in part by state tax funds unless excluded by the code, as specified by 1.001(a). The scored scope is those authorities, not a blanket exemption from law.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Applies beginning with the 2025–2026 school year.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Immediate-effect vote condition with September 1, 2025 fallback. This score does not infer effective date from enactment alone.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Version history: H21 adopted; H22 failed",
            "assessment": "H21 supplies the categorical rule/policy prohibition present in E/F. H22 proposed an exception for programs funded under Chapter 29, Subchapter J, but failed; no credit or penalty for that absent provision.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/government-relations-and-legal/texas-school-law-bulletin-2024-0.pdf",
          "sha256": "a8e705793479deed9f0e74495ea38b49fee36b1e77aa4c54a8d4e57f0114e44d",
          "locator": "PDF pages 61 and 461: Education 1.001(a) public support scope and 29.916(a)(1) parent-led homeschool definition.",
          "role": "Official TEA 2024 School Law Bulletin: pre-session definitions"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Amendments.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=HB2674",
          "sha256": "e3f27c438844f96d7b02c2ee4b1cd90d4f1e537bd651515c1e5d28e4cb4dbe04",
          "locator": "H21 Cook adopted; H22 Martinez Fischer failed; both May 12, 2025.",
          "role": "Official HB2674 amendment index"
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_artifact": "next-review/bounded-five-audit/report.json"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped criterion is separate from the unchanged official RPT wording. A satisfied narrow requirement yields 100 under the approved method; it does not mean the whole priority is fulfilled. No specific adverse provision was established in the reviewed text.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored: published or approved source-backed match had no complete numerical assessment. This candidate has not been published."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 334",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB00334F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "b973c0046ceb9158cfcc3ed7a2b3c3c59381358ebd008747f4fec306078e3445",
      "decision_source_sha256": "b973c0046ceb9158cfcc3ed7a2b3c3c59381358ebd008747f4fec306078e3445",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
      "review_type": "TPI source-backed assessment; independent implementation and interpretive audit accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Voluntary county employee family leave pools",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact enrolled version assessed. One applicable equal-weight TPI criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. Neutral implementation and retained law earn no extra points. This is alignment within the stated scope, not fulfillment of the entire priority or a prediction of outcomes.",
      "scored_requirement": "Enable parenting and family caregiving through a voluntary county leave-sharing program with stated eligibility and withdrawal safeguards.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "scoped-family-right",
          "requirement": "Enable parenting and family caregiving through a voluntary county leave-sharing program with stated eligibility and withdrawal safeguards.",
          "official_requirement": "promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools.",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, Local Government Code 157.082(a),157.084–157.087",
          "excerpt": "The commissioners court of a county by order may establish a program to allow an employee of the county to voluntarily transfer sick or vacation leave time earned by the employee to a county employee family leave pool.",
          "reason": "The new optional county program allows employees to share earned leave for birth, foster or adoptive placement, adult guardianship and specified illness or caregiving circumstances after exhausting eligible leave. Those operative permissions enable parenting and family care. County adoption and employee contributions are voluntary; eligibility, documentation, availability and withdrawal caps remain. The score is scoped alignment, not a universal leave entitlement or a claim that every employee will receive leave."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other independent children-and-family requirements",
          "reason": "No credit for unaddressed school screening, inspector-general powers, tiered penalties, misconduct agreements, whistleblower remedies, adoption/divorce/equal-parenting reforms, harmful-program elimination or obscene-device sales. No breadth-only deduction: assess actual provisions under the approved TPI scoped method."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.081–157.082",
            "assessment": "Defines the pool and administrator and permits a county to establish the program. County judge administers or appoints an administrator. County adoption is optional; an adopted program must comply with the subchapter.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.083",
            "assessment": "Employees may donate one or more days of accrued sick or vacation leave; donations reduce their own balance. Retiring employees may allocate hours between retirement credit and donations. Contributions remain voluntary.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.084(a)",
            "assessment": "Eligibility follows exhaustion of eligible compensatory, discretionary, sick and vacation leave for birth, foster/adoptive placement, adult guardianship, serious illness, pandemic circumstances, or a previous pool donation. Non-family personal-illness and prior-donor access are disclosed and not separately counted as family achievements.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.084(b),157.085(a)–(d)",
            "assessment": "Applications and family/guardianship documentation are required as specified; serious-illness requests have practitioner-statement conditions and pandemic requests require applicable documentation. The administrator must approve and credit time when eligibility is determined; these procedures do not guarantee unlimited leave.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.086",
            "assessment": "Withdrawal cannot exceed the lesser of one-third of the pool or 90 days; the administrator determines the amount within that ceiling.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, 157.087–157.088",
            "assessment": "Withdrawn leave receives earned-sick-leave treatment. A deceased employee’s estate has no entitlement to payment for unused withdrawn time. No new custody/adoption classification or compelled family arrangement is created.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Immediate-effect vote condition with September 1, 2025 fallback; legislative progress remains separate.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "scoped-family-right"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "audit_artifact": "next-review/bounded-five-audit/report.json"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped criterion is separate from the unchanged official RPT wording. A satisfied narrow requirement yields 100 under the approved method; it does not mean the whole priority is fulfilled. No specific adverse provision was established in the reviewed text.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-02",
          "reason": "Previously unscored: published or approved source-backed match had no complete numerical assessment. This candidate has not been published."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 2001",
      "priority": "kids",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Enrolled",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB02001F.htm",
      "source_sha256": "22a1656dcd914dd5bd565a36ba2bbc1b4e734508a829cae0871b9502e68b6ade",
      "decision_source_sha256": "22a1656dcd914dd5bd565a36ba2bbc1b4e734508a829cae0871b9502e68b6ade",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "To protect Texas children, strengthen families, and ensure safe schools, we propose these core reforms: School Employee Screening and Enforcement: To prevent abuse in schools, mandate rigorous employment screening procedures before hiring and again before every new contract for all public school employees. Codify an Independent Inspector General with broad authority, including subpoena power, criminal investigative referral, and the ability to apply Do Not Hire enforcement retroactively. Give the Education Code teeth: implement a tiered system of penalties and fines as enforcement; prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct. Promote Marriage and Strong Families: As marriage and strong families are the best protection for children, promote and respect marriage, family unity, parenting, and parental rights across all state agencies, including CPS (child protective services) and schools. Ban same-sex adoption. End no-fault divorce. When a marriage breaks down, family law proceedings should respect 50/50 equal parenting presumptions in the best interest of children. ∙ Protect Family Sovereignty and Privacy: In order to protect the rights of the family and end the collection of student data using harmful and deceptive practices, eliminate the funding and implementation of programs or materials that interfere with healthy family formation, family sovereignty, and student privacy – including Social Emotional Learning (SEL), harmful materials, school-based mental health surveys, health programming and clinics, online platforms, apps, other technology products, and the use of artificial intelligence. ∙ Sales and Display: Ban the sale or display of obscene devices in family-friendly stores and allow them only in sexually oriented businesses.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-08",
      "review_type": "Newly reconstructed TPI source-backed assessment; independent implementation and interpretive review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Criminal protection against coercive suppression of covered official information, including by school administrators",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version reviewed. One equally weighted TPI directional criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated narrow scope, not fulfillment of the entire priority, an official RPT grade, or a prediction of outcomes. Neutral implementation and retained law earn no additional points.",
      "scored_requirement": "Strengthen the existing criminal protection against a school administrator coercing someone to suppress or fail to report covered official information to law enforcement.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection",
          "requirement": "Strengthen the existing criminal protection against a school administrator coercing someone to suppress or fail to report covered official information to law enforcement.",
          "official_requirement": "prohibit NDAs (non disclosure agreements) and other attempts to hide educator misconduct through separation agreements and employment settlements; and provide clear whistleblower protections for reporters of misconduct.",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Sections 1–2; Penal Code 39.06(e), new (g), and repeal of (f), read with retained 39.06(a)(3) and (d)",
          "excerpt": "SECTION 2. Section 39.06(f), Penal Code, is repealed.",
          "reason": "Repealing the Class C misdemeanor exception makes the existing coercive-suppression offense subject to the third-degree felony default; specified net pecuniary gains can produce higher felony tiers. The retained offense expressly includes school administrators, but applies only when a public servant relies on nonpublic information accessed through office or employment and coerces another to suppress or fail to report it to law enforcement. Retained subsection (d) further defines the covered information by public access and Chapter 552 disclosure restrictions. TPI treats strengthening this existing criminal protection as directional support for misconduct reporting within the stated school-administrator scope. The bill does not newly create the coercion offense, ban all nondisclosure or separation agreements, create a civil whistleblower remedy, or protect every kind of report."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Other school enforcement and reporting requirements",
          "reason": "No credit for screening, inspector-general powers, Do Not Hire enforcement, Education Code fines, a general NDA/separation-agreement ban, or a new civil whistleblower remedy. These are not enacted by this bill."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Other children-and-family requirements",
          "reason": "No new marriage, adoption, divorce, parenting, student-program elimination, or obscene-device sales rules. These separate requirements are outside the bill’s operative scope, not treated as satisfied."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Misuse-of-information offenses outside school misconduct reporting",
          "reason": "The broader pecuniary-interest, speculation, and disclosure offenses and net-gain enhancements are reviewed but do not independently earn child-protection credit. No separate direct match to the other seven priorities is inferred merely from public-servant penalties."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, Penal Code 39.06(e)",
            "assessment": "Changes the exception reference from repealed subsection (f) to new subsection (g). The retained third-degree felony default now covers the former Class C coercive-suppression offense, subject to the new gain-based tiers. The underlying offense elements are unchanged.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, new Penal Code 39.06(g)(1)–(3)",
            "assessment": "When an offense yields net pecuniary gain, sets third-degree treatment below $150,000, second-degree treatment from $150,000 to less than $300,000, and first-degree treatment at $300,000 or more. Applies across section 39.06 offenses, not only school-related coercion. No additional criterion or points are assigned for broader public-corruption penalties.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "Repeals the prior Class C exception in subsection (f). This is the operative strengthening of the existing subsection (a)(3) protection, including school administrators, not a new reporting duty or a new NDA ban.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 3",
            "assessment": "Applies prospectively. If any element occurred before the effective date, former law continues to govern the offense. No retroactive penalty increase is credited.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 4",
            "assessment": "States a September 1, 2025 effective date. Passage and enactment status are separate from the alignment score and are not used to award points.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "kids-coercive-reporting-protection"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/84R/billtext/html/HB01783F.htm",
          "sha256": "eb1e537ea1f94320a377060185d1fdfd099846d58bf26e29e2e3d5ed19651c1a",
          "locator": "Section 5, Penal Code 39.06(a)",
          "role": "Historical enacted primary text establishing that the retained coercive-suppression offense already expressly included school administrators."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.ethics.state.tx.us/statutes/ch36_39.php",
          "sha256": "bf0712d1e0911ffc38f19fa249156f42eafb21d2ee4a6567268fb484e4883e2d",
          "locator": "Penal Code 39.06(a)–(f)",
          "role": "Official Texas Ethics Commission reproduction retaining the pre-HB 2001 text, including Class C subsection (f); used only as historical context, not current law."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PE/htm/PE.39.htm",
          "sha256": "553add39d0735af13366aec48e744e949e3e26364491db54c98aa4d9305b9fcb",
          "locator": "Penal Code 39.06(a)–(g) and amendment history",
          "role": "Current official compilation confirms retained offense elements, subsection (d) limits, and HB 2001 repeal and gain tiers."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/analysis/html/HB02001E.htm",
          "sha256": "a1ca36a8911c597cd4c92fb93e24960d6079e444017ce629020362bc4a42fda8",
          "locator": "Sections 1–4",
          "role": "Official Senate Research Center analysis corroborating the historical Class C exception and prospective penalty changes; analysis is supporting context, not the scored version."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "assessed_at": "2026-11-08"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped criterion is separate from the unchanged official RPT wording. A satisfied narrow requirement yields 100 under the approved method; it does not mean the whole priority is fulfilled. No specific adverse provision was established within this reviewed priority scope. No individual vote attribution or lawmaker grade is added.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-08",
          "reason": "Previously unscored in the 96-score baseline. This numerical assessment is newly reconstructed from official sources and independently reviewed; it is not presented as a restoration of the exact earlier score file."
        }
      ],
      "reconstruction": {
        "kind": "NEWLY_RECONSTRUCTED_FROM_OFFICIAL_SOURCES",
        "exact_original_score_json_recovered": false,
        "prior_accepted_value": 100,
        "prior_acceptance_is_not_new_record_validation": true
      }
    },
    {
      "schema_version": 1,
      "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
      "session": "89R",
      "bill": "HB 3113",
      "priority": "elections",
      "standard_set": "rpt-90th-2026",
      "version": "Engrossed",
      "source_url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/HB03113E.htm",
      "source_sha256": "ea4fce962509a02305e9a65ff90ee5f822411a26e77b53d59a04fe02029dd53b",
      "decision_source_sha256": "ea4fce962509a02305e9a65ff90ee5f822411a26e77b53d59a04fe02029dd53b",
      "source_representation": "Original official HTML bytes",
      "priority_text": "To safeguard election integrity, to ensure that only eligible citizens participate, to promote transparency, and to restore public trust in Texas elections, we propose these core reforms: • Strict Voter Registration and Eligibility: Require proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, stipulate English-only ballots, and mandate that counties and the Secretary of State update voter rolls quarterly with cross-checks that reject commercial or mail-house addresses as residential locations. • Secure In-Person Voting with Photo ID: Mandate a U.S. or Texas government-issued photo ID for every election, with no exceptions; restrict mail-in ballots to voters with disabilities, active-duty military, and citizens absent from the state; limit elections to single-day, precinct-only voting with the discretion to consolidate precinct voting locations. • Paper Ballot Security and Counting: Use only hand-marked, sequentially numbered, anti counterfeiting paper ballots signed by election officials; conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls; publish precinct-level results before submission to the county; and provide for cost effective precinct auditing. • Closed Primaries and Party Accountability: Restrict voting in party primaries to registered members only, require candidates on the ballot to be registered with that party, and mandate that local and municipal candidates declare a party affiliation. • Strengthen Administration and Finance Rules: Make the Secretary of State an elected office; remove existing waivers from Election Code; enact legislation that penalizes the unlawful altering of election procedures – including unauthorized waivers and advisories – by public and election officials; limit out-of-state donations; and prohibit foreign and terrorist-linked donations. • Standardize Elections and Oversight: Align all local, municipal, and school district bond elections with county and state general election dates (requiring two-thirds approval for bonds); school districts shall be prohibited from conducting, administering, or overseeing their own elections; and all elections must be conducted under one uniform statewide election administration system to ensure consistency, transparency, accountability, and election integrity across Texas.",
      "priority_source_url": "https://texasgop.org/priorities/",
      "priority_source_sha256": "e3f119280ceb4f46ed4eb03f7c37787d86ed06e14777b99d7d297c1f51c703ce",
      "assessed_at": "2026-11-08",
      "review_type": "Newly reconstructed TPI source-backed assessment; independent implementation and interpretive review accepted; not human reviewed",
      "complete": true,
      "scope": "Optical-scanner-compatible paper ballot design in counties conducting a hand count",
      "scope_explanation": "All substantive provisions of this exact version reviewed. One equally weighted TPI directional criterion is satisfied: 1 / 1 × 100 = 100. This is alignment within the stated narrow scope, not fulfillment of the entire priority, an official RPT grade, or a prediction of outcomes. Neutral implementation and retained law earn no additional points.",
      "scored_requirement": "Require paper ballots used in hand-count counties to be capable of being scanned and processed by an optical scanner.",
      "criteria": [
        {
          "id": "elections-scannable-paper-ballots",
          "requirement": "Require paper ballots used in hand-count counties to be capable of being scanned and processed by an optical scanner.",
          "official_requirement": "conduct precinct-level counting with dumb (offline) scanners at each polling location immediately upon the close of polls",
          "weight": 1,
          "outcome": "satisfied",
          "locator": "Section 1, proposed Election Code 52.076",
          "excerpt": "For an election in a county that conducts a hand count of voted paper ballots, the ballot must be capable of being scanned and processed by an optical scanner.",
          "reason": "The engrossed version expressly requires optical-scanner capability for paper ballots in counties that conduct a hand count. TPI treats that design requirement as narrow directional support for the official scanner-counting clause because it makes the specified ballots capable of scanner processing. This is an explicit TPI interpretation. The bill requires no scanner purchase, actual scanner use, offline operation, precinct-level processing, immediate counting, or particular audit procedure; it does not prohibit hand counting. Those unaddressed requirements are excluded rather than claimed as satisfied."
        }
      ],
      "excluded": [
        {
          "requirement": "Scanner use, offline operation, precinct location, immediate counting, publication, and audits",
          "reason": "The bill mandates only ballot capability. It does not require scanners to be obtained or used, specify network connectivity or counting location or timing, require results publication, or establish an auditing procedure."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Other ballot-design requirements",
          "reason": "No new hand-marking, sequential numbering, anti-counterfeiting, or election-official signature rules are enacted by these two sections. Existing requirements are not scored as new achievements."
        },
        {
          "requirement": "Other election-priority requirements",
          "reason": "No new citizenship, registration, English-language, voter-roll, photo-ID, mail-voting, precinct-voting, primary-membership, candidate-affiliation, administration, donation, or election-date rules. No other priority is directly changed by this ballot-capability measure."
        }
      ],
      "provision_review": {
        "complete": true,
        "parts": [
          {
            "locator": "Section 1, proposed Election Code 52.076",
            "assessment": "Adds one rule: in a county conducting a hand count of voted paper ballots, ballots must be capable of being scanned and processed by an optical scanner. It neither mandates actual scanning nor abolishes hand counting. No offline, precinct, immediate-count, or audit mandate is present.",
            "outcome": "aligned",
            "criterion_id": "elections-scannable-paper-ballots"
          },
          {
            "locator": "Section 2",
            "assessment": "States a September 1, 2025 effective date. This is the engrossed bill’s proposed effective-date clause, not a finding that the bill became law. Enactment status is separate from scoring.",
            "outcome": "neutral",
            "criterion_id": "elections-scannable-paper-ballots"
          }
        ]
      },
      "context_sources": [
        {
          "url": "https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/analysis/html/HB03113E.htm",
          "sha256": "db4ea0b957a8bddc5de63994befc5719972322f0584ef06f73ea4c19d1cc6b18",
          "locator": "Section 1 and stated intent",
          "role": "Official Senate Research Center analysis corroborates the engrossed optical-scanner-capability rule. Stated audit benefits are not treated as enacted audit duties."
        }
      ],
      "interpretive_audit": {
        "status": "INDEPENDENT_IMPLEMENTATION_AND_INTERPRETIVE_REVIEW_ACCEPTED",
        "human_reviewed": false,
        "assessed_at": "2026-11-08"
      },
      "interpretation_note": "TPI-defined scoped criterion is separate from the unchanged official RPT wording. A satisfied narrow requirement yields 100 under the approved method; it does not mean the whole priority is fulfilled. No specific adverse provision was established within this reviewed priority scope. No individual vote attribution or lawmaker grade is added.",
      "score_history": [
        {
          "method": "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2",
          "value": null,
          "assessed_at": "2026-11-08",
          "reason": "Previously unscored in the 96-score baseline. This numerical assessment is newly reconstructed from official sources and independently reviewed; it is not presented as a restoration of the exact earlier score file."
        }
      ],
      "reconstruction": {
        "kind": "NEWLY_RECONSTRUCTED_FROM_OFFICIAL_SOURCES",
        "exact_original_score_json_recovered": false,
        "prior_accepted_value": 100,
        "prior_acceptance_is_not_new_record_validation": true
      }
    }
  ],
  "methods": [
    "tpi-clause-v1",
    "tpi-scoped-provisions-v2"
  ]
}
